Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,693 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,188,836
Pageviews Today: 2,942,875Threads Today: 576Posts Today: 12,726
07:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23632111
United States
11/21/2012 04:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
Should they not be following the original texts and not some plagiarized work??? Yet, would that not be admitting that they still believe in a "pagan" work? Either way, their Bible is based 100% on PAGAN texts...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872


All this information, lost through time. It makes you wonder where the Sumerians based there stories....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28216119
United States
11/21/2012 04:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
It predates Genesis
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27644686




Let's say your belief is right there (which it is not yeahsure ) the Bible goes on to say the Messiah would come AND gives the exact year he would arrive.(Daniel 9:24-26). Also, from the OT book of Daniel are the empires that would rule the earth from the time of Babylon until Rome, written 650 BC (confirmed in DSS), before Rome ever existed. The Roman Church is then found in Revelation before it ever existed.



Sumeria is located in the Land of Kish (Kush or Cush) founded by son of Noah's son Ham after the global flood.

"Kish was occupied beginning in the Jemdet Nasr period (3100 BC), gaining prominence as one of the pre-eminent powers in the region during the early dynastic period.

The Sumerian king list states that it was the first city to have kings following the deluge, beginning with Jushur."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"Cush, son of Ham. The Empire of Kush to the south of Egypt is known from at least 1970 BC, but this name has also been associated by some with the Kassites who inhabited the Zagros area of Mesopotamia, the Sumerian city of Kish in the Land of Kish."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]


The fact is nothing confirms the Sumer tablets. They are a fictional pagan account of the true biblical record compiled by Moses from tablets or some record handed down from the very time of Adam.(Wiseman Theory)
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Most who quote this Sumer tablet nonsense have no original sources and jumble up translations with Sitchin's fringe interpretation. They have no original source documents for the proper translation and do not even know what it says.
[link to creation.com]

The same critics use to also claim Babylon never existed: the only record of the empire was in the Bible; Then it was unearthed in Iraq.
[link to amazingdiscoveries.org]


Claim:
The Sumer tablets are the oldest text.

Reply:
Understand how TEXT dating is done: the physical dating of an archaeological relic does not date the original TEXT, which is dated by events and characters in the text then confirmed with the sciences.

"The oldest known tablets written in stone" means little as original biblical texts were copied to parchment repeatedly and the originals destroyed as they were used to the point of being worn out and useless. But by this time there were thousands of copies so originals were unimportant.

Older manuscript/tablet has no more credibility over the majority text in agreement: Majority coming from different parts of the world, all in agreement. This is what is found with the Textus Receptus Greek New Testament and Hebrew Masoretic Old Testament, King James Version manuscripts. Oldest known does not mean more credible or reliable in textual criticism, just means the originals were destroyed, lost or possibly being kept from us.

The pagan Sumer tablets do not tell of real events, while the books of the Bible are confirmed repeatedly with HISTORY and SCIENCE.

Genesis tells histories long before Babylon and the flood, compiled by Moses including many prophecies precluding anything but divinely inspired Word of GOD!







 Quoting: - 14012564
Ever hear of carbon dating? and considering that the tablets were wet clay when the texts were recorded,that does make them the oldest physical record of text. Oh and btw, Wikipedia does not count as a credible source...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28098900

Carbon dating has been proven to be faulty. Besides Parchment texts rot and decay, stone does not so just because the stone is "older", than the most recent surviving copies of parchment, means nothing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28098900
United States
11/21/2012 04:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
Should they not be following the original texts and not some plagiarized work??? Yet, would that not be admitting that they still believe in a "pagan" work? Either way, their Bible is based 100% on PAGAN texts...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872

Its the other way around, Sumerian Texts are a rip off of the Bible.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28216119
You're living proof that blind faith is still blind.. lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28098900
United States
11/21/2012 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28216119
Ever hear of carbon dating? and considering that the tablets were wet clay when the texts were recorded,that does make them the oldest physical record of text. Oh and btw, Wikipedia does not count as a credible source...

Carbon dating has been proven to be faulty. Besides Parchment texts rot and decay, stone does not so just because the stone is "older", than the most recent surviving copies of parchment, means nothing.
Carbon dating is accurate up to 10,000 yrs ,beyond that it,it starts to become less accurate
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28098900
United States
11/21/2012 04:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
Carbon dating has been proven to be faulty. Besides Parchment texts rot and decay, stone does not so just because the stone is "older", than the most recent surviving copies of parchment, means nothing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28216119
Carbon dating is accurate to 10,000 yrs after that it begins to display some inaccuracies
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24141363
United States
11/21/2012 04:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
The Sumerian texts are nothing but a nephilim created monkey hybrid races explanation of Genesis 6.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24141363


It predates Genesis you stupid retard!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27644686


Oh yea? Do you time travel? You get your info from illuminati funded researchers. Calling me retard when you're an rh positive monkey blood. Whatever clone.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27644686
United States
11/21/2012 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
Carbon dating has been proven to be faulty. Besides Parchment texts rot and decay, stone does not so just because the stone is "older", than the most recent surviving copies of parchment, means nothing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28216119
Carbon dating is accurate to 10,000 yrs after that it begins to display some inaccuracies
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28098900


Shhhh...

Christards aren't too good with facts and science, dontcha know?!

They hang on to claims like that to make their fairytale seem more real. Guys can live inside whales, too, remember?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27644686
United States
11/21/2012 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
The Sumerian texts are nothing but a nephilim created monkey hybrid races explanation of Genesis 6.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24141363


It predates Genesis you stupid retard!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27644686


Oh yea? Do you time travel? You get your info from illuminati funded researchers. Calling me retard when you're an rh positive monkey blood. Whatever clone.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24141363


Where do you get your info from? Christard funded researchers whose opinions aren't worth shit to anyone in the world who isn't a knuckle-dragging retard Christard?

NEWS FLASH!!!!!! SECULAR SCIENTISTS > CHRISTARDS!!!!!!

Christians are so stupid they have to reinforce each other's beliefs in some kind of a preach to the choir nonsense orgy!

skull_fing
-
User ID: 14012564
United States
11/21/2012 05:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
(video)
[link to archive.org]
USMC_RECON

User ID: 27588648
United States
11/21/2012 11:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
Should they not be following the original texts and not some plagiarized work??? Yet, would that not be admitting that they still believe in a "pagan" work? Either way, their Bible is based 100% on PAGAN texts...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872



Because christians are easily brainwashed into believing anything.

Take a look at the contradictions in the Bible for instance, or the fact that their leaders are mostly pedophiles and rapists.

Christians are inherently IGNORANT - as evidenced by the fact that they won't read other views of history.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


nice....and you are what? A bible hater...LOL...so what! Christian hater...so what! Balahh Balahh Balahh...that is all you post....little man (err....bitch) on a little land...fuck you and christianity....I don't like you...and it's personal you fucking tard...feel me walker?!
I work for the Government......I'm here to help!
[link to projects.militarytimes.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21363812
Canada
11/22/2012 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Can someone explain why the Christians adhere to the O/T, when the O/T is a rip off of the Sumerian texts?
The "Wiseman Hypothesis" remains WITHOUT acceptance in scholarly circles, in fact, most scholars won't even comment on it, and those that do give sound reasoning why it's a bunch of you-know-what. (gotta love those people who think Wikipedia is research!)

We hear how Noah's son, Ham, founded Sumeria after the flood - but what they won't tell you is WHO Noah is.... the son of Enki!!

Ziusudra (Sumerian), aka Utnapishtim, Atra-hasis (Akkadian, Babylonian) is the son of Enki by Batanash (wife of LuMach), but Noah is the name given to this person in the OT. The EARLIEST extant (still surviving) flood legend is contained in the Sumerian Eridu Genesis, datable by its script to the 17th century BC. The current dating of the earliest OT texts, among scholars and text critics, is somewhere between the 6th and 8th centuries BC.

Andrew R. George submits that the flood story in Genesis 6–8 matches the Gilgamesh flood myth so closely, "few doubt" that it derives from a Mesopotamian account (The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts. Oxford University Press.)

And how about this from Rabbinic scholar Robert Wexler who says: "The most likely assumption we can make is that both Genesis and Gilgamesh drew their material from a common tradition about the flood that existed in Mesopotamia. These stories then diverged in the retelling. (Ancient Near Eastern Mythology, 2001)

Kismet

News