Users Online Now: 1,501 (Who's On?) Visitors Today: 203,629 Pageviews Today: 260,335 Threads Today: 45 Posts Today: 974 01:54 AM

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

# EQ 6.1 CHILE

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9253046
United States
11/21/2012 06:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
that guy was right.
dont know what thread it was in.

+/- day

nov 20 = 6+
nov 22 = 6.5+
nov 28 = 7
dec 4-5 = 7+
dec 11 = 7+
dec 17-18= 8+
dec 21 = 10+

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

The guy's name is Patrick Geryl and there are several threads on GLP if you search by Geryl. Some man from Greece did an odds calculation as far as Geryl being right, and it was something like 1 in 500,000. (I could be wrong about that, but I will try to find it and post it here.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
bendinglight

User ID: 2143478
United States
11/21/2012 06:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
(Note) Below is for data recordings

11/16 Buoy station 46413 Alaska in event mode
11/17 6.1 Earthquake Tonga (East of Australia)
11/18 Buoy station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)

__________________________

10/20 6.2 Earthquake Vanuatu (East of Australia)
10/21 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
10/24 6.5 Earthquake Costa Rica (Lower Americas)

___________________________

9/27 Buoy Station 46413 Alaska in event mode
9/27 6.0 Earthquake Solomon (East of Australia)
9/28 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
9/30 7.3 Earthquake Colombia (Lower Americas)
Quoting: bendinglight

There are all different things going on currently, different patterns.. all that end badly for the lower Americas.
This is the first time I've seen multiple patterns intersect like this before.
So who knows what that means, perhaps nothing or maybe worst plate movement to date?

Back on the 13th I gave a two week window based upon previous data which would end of the 27th.

Now this a new pattern is developing with connections to movement east of Australia ending with the lower Americas.
The data of that pattern shows between the 21st-23rd.

Take whatever data you want, all keeps leading to the same location.
Quoting: bendinglight

Just now: Thread: EQ 6.1 CHILE

11/16 Buoy station 46413 Alaska in event mode
11/17 6.1 Earthquake Tonga (East of Australia)
11/18 Buoy station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
11/21 6.1 Earthquake Chile (Lower Americas)
__________________________

10/20 6.2 Earthquake Vanuatu (East of Australia)
10/21 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
10/24 6.5 Earthquake Costa Rica (Lower Americas)

___________________________

9/27 Buoy Station 46413 Alaska in event mode
9/27 6.0 Earthquake Solomon (East of Australia)
9/28 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
9/30 7.3 Earthquake Colombia (Lower Americas)

No wonder they shut down buoy Station 55012 a couple days ago

No man I predict that not him long before him, he only using my prediction ..

Anyway is that you Dettro or some fucker ??
Quoting: Rain-Man

Dude stop accusing people of stealing your "predictions" ,Bendinglight is based of bouys , you i don't really know what you base your predictions from or on but some have been right. And yes its me!!
Quoting: Dettro

Thank you Dettro for actually reading my threads and using common sense to back me up.

I fully dopcument and explain in detail my personal system throughout my threads and on youtube.
Based upon BUOY PATTERNS that everybody can clearly see.
Only recently have I read "Rain-Man's" system which is based upon a completely different system regarding stuff going on in the solar system, such as eclipses and alignments etc.
I don't even understand how Rain Man picks earthquake locations based upon what's going on in space.
What Buoy pattern data I follow gives specific locations based upon the pattern.

For whatever reason he keeps accusing me of stuff that makes zero sense.
Two completely different systems!
Yet I never even talked shit on his threads ever, just for me to find out I was recently added to his "foes" list.
My only guess why is that his ego isn't big enough just yet...

Which is sad because we're all humans in this together.
I don't make money off anything I do, I don't attack others.. I share what I know to empower my fellow man who seeks growth and knowledge in this crazy time.

Btw since I've been covering these buoy patterns.. NOAA has been SHUTTING DOWN these buoys left and right.

Thread: 7 Buoys Shut Down Along Australian Coast. There Hiding Somthing...!

Pretty soon I'll be left with no data and unable to make anymore forecasts if this continues.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27116573
United States
11/21/2012 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
that guy was right.
dont know what thread it was in.

+/- day

nov 20 = 6+
nov 22 = 6.5+
nov 28 = 7
dec 4-5 = 7+
dec 11 = 7+
dec 17-18= 8+
dec 21 = 10+

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

The guy's name is Patrick Geryl and there are several threads on GLP if you search by Geryl. Some man from Greece did an odds calculation as far as Geryl being right, and it was something like 1 in 500,000. (I could be wrong about that, but I will try to find it and post it here.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

One problem with all that crap you just posted .. it was actually a 5.9 quake!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9253046
United States
11/21/2012 06:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE

(Note) Below is for data recordings

11/16 Buoy station 46413 Alaska in event mode
11/17 6.1 Earthquake Tonga (East of Australia)
11/18 Buoy station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)

__________________________

10/20 6.2 Earthquake Vanuatu (East of Australia)
10/21 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
10/24 6.5 Earthquake Costa Rica (Lower Americas)

___________________________

9/27 Buoy Station 46413 Alaska in event mode
9/27 6.0 Earthquake Solomon (East of Australia)
9/28 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
9/30 7.3 Earthquake Colombia (Lower Americas)
Quoting: bendinglight

There are all different things going on currently, different patterns.. all that end badly for the lower Americas.
This is the first time I've seen multiple patterns intersect like this before.
So who knows what that means, perhaps nothing or maybe worst plate movement to date?

Bendinglight, what are YOUR earthquake predictions until the end of 2012? (Or, if you can refer me to a thread or whatever, I'd appreciate it.) Or do you just warn a few hours ahead. (Please don't take that as any kind of put-down -- I'm just not familiar with your predictions. Sorry.)

Back on the 13th I gave a two week window based upon previous data which would end of the 27th.

Now this a new pattern is developing with connections to movement east of Australia ending with the lower Americas.
The data of that pattern shows between the 21st-23rd.

Take whatever data you want, all keeps leading to the same location.
Quoting: bendinglight

Just now: Thread: EQ 6.1 CHILE

11/16 Buoy station 46413 Alaska in event mode
11/17 6.1 Earthquake Tonga (East of Australia)
11/18 Buoy station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
11/21 6.1 Earthquake Chile (Lower Americas)
__________________________

10/20 6.2 Earthquake Vanuatu (East of Australia)
10/21 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
10/24 6.5 Earthquake Costa Rica (Lower Americas)

___________________________

9/27 Buoy Station 46413 Alaska in event mode
9/27 6.0 Earthquake Solomon (East of Australia)
9/28 Buoy Station 55012 in event mode (East of Australia)
9/30 7.3 Earthquake Colombia (Lower Americas)

No wonder they shut down buoy Station 55012 a couple days ago

...

Dude stop accusing people of stealing your "predictions" ,Bendinglight is based of bouys , you i don't really know what you base your predictions from or on but some have been right. And yes its me!!
Quoting: Dettro

Thank you Dettro for actually reading my threads and using common sense to back me up.

I fully dopcument and explain in detail my personal system throughout my threads and on youtube.
Based upon BUOY PATTERNS that everybody can clearly see.
Only recently have I read "Rain-Man's" system which is based upon a completely different system regarding stuff going on in the solar system, such as eclipses and alignments etc.
I don't even understand how Rain Man picks earthquake locations based upon what's going on in space.
What Buoy pattern data I follow gives specific locations based upon the pattern.

For whatever reason he keeps accusing me of stuff that makes zero sense.
Two completely different systems!
Yet I never even talked shit on his threads ever, just for me to find out I was recently added to his "foes" list.
My only guess why is that his ego isn't big enough just yet...

Which is sad because we're all humans in this together.
I don't make money off anything I do, I don't attack others.. I share what I know to empower my fellow man who seeks growth and knowledge in this crazy time.

Btw since I've been covering these buoy patterns.. NOAA has been SHUTTING DOWN these buoys left and right.

Thread: 7 Buoys Shut Down Along Australian Coast. There Hiding Somthing...!

Pretty soon I'll be left with no data and unable to make anymore forecasts if this continues.
Quoting: Rain-Man
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9253046
United States
11/21/2012 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
that guy was right.
dont know what thread it was in.

+/- day

nov 20 = 6+
nov 22 = 6.5+
nov 28 = 7
dec 4-5 = 7+
dec 11 = 7+
dec 17-18= 8+
dec 21 = 10+

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

The guy's name is Patrick Geryl and there are several threads on GLP if you search by Geryl. Some man from Greece did an odds calculation as far as Geryl being right, and it was something like 1 in 500,000. (I could be wrong about that, but I will try to find it and post it here.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

One problem with all that crap you just posted .. it was actually a 5.9 quake!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27116573

No need to get nasty!! When I was trying to find the thread, I didn't know that it had been downgraded. I just find earthquake predictions interesting and from what I have been able to learn, Geryl has a pretty good track record. Again, I am not saying that he is 100% right -- and I SAID that I didn't THINK earthquakes can be predicted, but it just makes me wonder -- so back off! (Please.)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25573906
United States
11/21/2012 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
...

The guy's name is Patrick Geryl and there are several threads on GLP if you search by Geryl. Some man from Greece did an odds calculation as far as Geryl being right, and it was something like 1 in 500,000. (I could be wrong about that, but I will try to find it and post it here.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

One problem with all that crap you just posted .. it was actually a 5.9 quake!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27116573

No need to get nasty!! When I was trying to find the thread, I didn't know that it had been downgraded. I just find earthquake predictions interesting and from what I have been able to learn, Geryl has a pretty good track record. Again, I am not saying that he is 100% right -- and I SAID that I didn't THINK earthquakes can be predicted, but it just makes me wonder -- so back off! (Please.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

EQ predictions really grind my gears, I was an arse.

Consider me told, I apologise.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9253046
United States
11/21/2012 06:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Bendingight, can you please tell me what your earthquake predictions are for the rest of 2012 -- or direct me to a thread or whatever that lists your predictions? Or do you just predict within a few hours or so? (I am not putting you down at all, but I am just not familiar with your work. Sorry.)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9253046
United States
11/21/2012 06:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
...

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

One problem with all that crap you just posted .. it was actually a 5.9 quake!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27116573

No need to get nasty!! When I was trying to find the thread, I didn't know that it had been downgraded. I just find earthquake predictions interesting and from what I have been able to learn, Geryl has a pretty good track record. Again, I am not saying that he is 100% right -- and I SAID that I didn't THINK earthquakes can be predicted, but it just makes me wonder -- so back off! (Please.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

EQ predictions really grind my gears, I was an arse.

Consider me told, I apologise.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25573906

Apology accepted! And Happy Thanksgiving to you and eveyrone on GLP!

User ID: 15732022
United States
11/21/2012 06:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Probably stronger will come also ..
Quoting: Rain-Man

Yes based on Bendinglight thread a 7+ quake is coming.

Quoting: Dettro

That had some good info in it D,weird the quakes started right back up,'they' don't want to over do the doom until its time.lol
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” – Carl Sagan
Rain-Man

User ID: 28227720
Bosnia and Herzegovina
11/21/2012 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Only recently have I read "Rain-Man's" system which is based upon a completely different system regarding stuff going on in the solar system, such as eclipses and alignments etc.
I don't even understand how Rain Man picks earthquake locations based upon what's going on in space.
What Buoy pattern data I follow gives specific locations based upon the pattern.

Quoting: bendinglight

You are really funny man I wrote this many times and all know what I monitoring, and you posting like you drop from the sky .. o0

But I know yo00u .. ..

Let see what you will predict accurate without my posts and prediction in time ahead, and some others ..

How could you predict any EQs anymore in today's world just based off alignments of the stars and planets alone. We have HAARP weapons and other scalar weapons that can trigger such events anywhere. Russians had it since the 60s, so this technology has been around for 40+ yrs. Just hoping you take that into account too,op.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14089893

Who said my prediction based only on " alignments of the stars and planets alone" ..

If this is true anyone could predict earthquakes ..

That's only some 10 % of my prediction methods, have more of 15 different influence what I monitoring also calculating etc ..

Wrote that many times, also I don't posting other methods because of many reasons and just inform you sometimes about coming alignments etc ..

If you have two times similar or same position or alignments you will not get similar EQ, it's much more complicated from that ..
Quoting: Rain-Man

Last Edited by Rain-Man on 11/21/2012 07:11 PM
2curious

User ID: 28167991
Chile
11/21/2012 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Hey Dettro!!!

Felt it here... this one and many others last few days.

Not a scientist but my gut tells me we will probably get a 7+ soon. Thank goodness we can handle it.

T - Hi! Saw your post and figured it was about time I got out of hiding and lurking and show up for the party!

Hope everyone is well in their corner of the world!!

Last Edited by 2Curious on 11/21/2012 06:59 PM
bendinglight

User ID: 2143478
United States
11/21/2012 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Bendingight, can you please tell me what your earthquake predictions are for the rest of 2012 -- or direct me to a thread or whatever that lists your predictions? Or do you just predict within a few hours or so? (I am not putting you down at all, but I am just not familiar with your work. Sorry.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

I am not psychic... but buoy and earthquake data have formed patterns recently.
The patterns have been clear and 100% accurate.
Then NOAA turned off the Java, Indonesia Buoy which was the most important data I needed.
Since then I've been solely studying the Northern Pacific because the pattern involved there as well.
Without data from Java I've been more guessing now based off when certain activity takes place in the Northern Pacific.
It's been accurate mostly so far but I feel less conformable with less data.
A couple days ago I found a new pattern based off of buoy station 55012 (east of Australia) and within hours of me sharing that pattern that buoy was shut down as well.
That pattern lead to the lower Americas as well.

I can only work with data, that's it.
Taking away all this buoy data has really hurt me but there are four things I've learned.

Indonesian area plates are adjusting and has worsened. (even shown by recent articles of "sinking areas" with that region)

The Northern Pacific is destabilizing which I first wrote about back in August and has made itself very clear more recent.
There will be more large earthquakes up there and more buoy activity around Alaska I'm sure.

The Lower Americas will be wiped out...
Every plate adjustment/pattern etc I've noticed each time leads to a large earthquake in that region.
Sometimes affects buoys there thousands miles away in that general area.
It appears that area will be physically on the move at some point.
You can recall from a year ago all the "Earth Booms"? well a lot of them made the news in Costa Rica which has been getting hammered lately.
I don't know exactly WHEN that will happen but I DO KNOW the steps and signs will be obvious before hand.

Lastly I most recently noticed the New Madrid is picking up around the time after the Northern Pacific activity occurs and the Lower Americas has a large earthquake.
Take for example the 4.3 Kentucky earthquake and yesterdays the 3.6 in Illinois.
You'll find that data matching for both of those quakes.

It was already admitted by the scientific community that there is a plate breakup around Sumatra, Indonesia.
The April 11th quakes sent earthquake pressure globally.
I've covered that here:
Thread: Maine Earthquake is connected to Indonesia movement, proven! Evidence of Indonesia movement putting pressure on other regions and Buoy data also.

It makes sense plate are on the move AND putting pressure on other regions to move.
That is the only explanation I have for these recent buoy/earthquake patterns.
These patterns cannot be possible unless one area adjustment actually puts pressure on another area... that's what the evidence shows.
Again I don't know time frames, all we can do is follow each step by step.
So far these patterns have been in-between a few days up to two weeks at most.
After one adjustment completes is when I document what the next step will be but I never go beyond that because I don't know.

All this really is is just a plate movement pattern.
The pattern has been on-going and accurate now for a couple months.
I believe if we follow the pattern and steps we all really can learn a lot and perhaps make some general kind of impact for the greater good.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7554855
11/21/2012 07:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
that guy was right.
dont know what thread it was in.

+/- day

nov 20 = 6+
nov 22 = 6.5+
nov 28 = 7
dec 4-5 = 7+
dec 11 = 7+
dec 17-18= 8+
dec 21 = 10+

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

He didn't tell ya all of them will happen in the middle of nowhere. doom for regional animals maybe

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14443159

in all fairness i dont think he said they would be in populated areas either i could be wrong though.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

He did not give locations. So he is very accurate.
bendinglight

User ID: 2143478
United States
11/21/2012 07:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
Only recently have I read "Rain-Man's" system which is based upon a completely different system regarding stuff going on in the solar system, such as eclipses and alignments etc.
I don't even understand how Rain Man picks earthquake locations based upon what's going on in space.
What Buoy pattern data I follow gives specific locations based upon the pattern.

Quoting: bendinglight

You are really funny man I wrote this many times and all know what I monitoring, and you posting like you drop from the sky .. o0

But I know yo00u .. ..

How could you predict any EQs anymore in today's world just based off alignments of the stars and planets alone. We have HAARP weapons and other scalar weapons that can trigger such events anywhere. Russians had it since the 60s, so this technology has been around for 40+ yrs. Just hoping you take that into account too,op.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14089893

Who said my prediction based only on " alignments of the stars and planets alone" ..

If this is true anyone could predict earthquakes ..

That's only some 10 % of my prediction methods, have more of 15 different influence what I monitoring also calculating etc ..

Wrote that many times, also I don't posting other methods because of many reasons and just inform you sometimes about coming alignments etc ..

If you have two times similar or same position or alignments you will not get similar EQ, it's much more complicated from that ..
Quoting: Rain-Man

Quoting: Rain-Man

Lets look at some of the work I've done.

Watch the stages and patterns, starting with the first:

Step 1 Java, Indonesia seafloor adjustment

* Indonesia Volcanic eruptions:
8/25 Batu Tara volcano, Indonesia eruption:
Sulawesi, Indonesia eruption

Step 2 Buoy event showing movement by Alaska's Aleutian Islands:

Step 3 8/27
"Magnitude 7.4 earthquake hits El Salvador; tsunami warning issued" [link to latimesblogs.latimes.com]

8/29-9/5 Movement leading to Costa Rica quake:

Step 1 Java, Indonesia seafloor adjustment

* Indonesia Volcanic eruptions
Aug 31, 2012
"Batu Tara volcano (Sunda Islands, Indonesia)
Ash eruptions occurred both today and yesterday"

Step 2 Buoy event showing movement by Alaska's Aleutian Islands

Step 3 9/5
Thread: EARTHQUAKE.... HITS: Costa Rica MAGNITUDE 7.5-7.9
"Magnitude 7.9 Quake Off Costa Rica, Tsunami Warning"

Note Buoy event by Alaska started two hours before Costa Rica earthquake occurred.

9/23-9/30 Movement leading to Columbia quake:

Step 1 Java, Indonesia seafloor adjustment

* Indonesia Volcanic eruptions
"Marapi volcano (Sumatra, Indonesia): new eruption,
Marapi volcano had a modest eruption this evening (26 Sep)
The eruption, probably the largest in this year so far... accompanied by load roaring noises"

Step 2 Buoy event showing movement by Alaska's Aleutian Islands:

Step 3 9/30
"Magnitude 7.3 quake strikes southwest Colombia, USGS says"

There you have it!

Buoy/quake PATTERNS!!
Totally different system than what you do.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28209364
Argentina
11/21/2012 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE

That's nothing here in Chile. I didn't feel anything. A badass EQ here is beyond 8.0.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21733306

yea if its a big earthquake the whole country falls into the sea

MatrixLNIN11

User ID: 20347511
United States
11/21/2012 11:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Re: EQ 6.1 CHILE
that guy was right.
dont know what thread it was in.

+/- day

nov 20 = 6+
nov 22 = 6.5+
nov 28 = 7
dec 4-5 = 7+
dec 11 = 7+
dec 17-18= 8+
dec 21 = 10+

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1834146

The guy's name is Patrick Geryl and there are several threads on GLP if you search by Geryl. Some man from Greece did an odds calculation as far as Geryl being right, and it was something like 1 in 500,000. (I could be wrong about that, but I will try to find it and post it here.)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Okay, I found the thread, Right On Cue, a 6.8 earthquake. I posted the following (in italics) on November 16, five days ago:

According to Wikipedia, 100-150 6.0-6.9 earthquakes happen each year. (Info follows in italics.) Any mathematicians on line want to calculate what the odds are for Geryl's accuracy to date, and what the odds will be that he will be right November 20 +/- one day? (I don't know enough to argue that he IS right, but I would guess that he is beating the odds. And, yes, I have always held with the conventional and scientific opinion that earthquakes CANNOT be predicted, but . . . )

6.0–6.9 Strong VI to X Can be damaging/destructive in populated areas. Damage to many to all buildings; poorly designed structures incur moderate to severe damage. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Most likely felt hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Can be damaging further from the epicenter; up to tens of miles/kilometers away. Death toll between none and 25,000. 100 to 150 per year
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

An AC from Greece replied at 2:47 p.m. on 11/17, if youwant to verify:

Let's calculate that one...As far as i know for sure, Patrick hit at least 3 of the last 4 Major 7+ quakes...there are about 15 total in a year, which means 1,25 a month. To predict one correctly with a 1-day span gives a chance of 4,1%. For a 2-day span goes to 8.2%. So, assuming 2 of each groups for the ones he hit, total possibility of 3 consequitive 7+ mag quakes is 0,02%.

About the 6+ quakes he hit: I'm assuming the lowest number that we can verify he hit here, are about 4. There are about 125 6+ quakes a year, which means around 34% chance for one to occur in one day. Therefore, hiting 4 of them consequitively, has a chance of happening around 1,33%.

Now if we multiply both the 7+ and 6+ chance, we get an abysmal chance of 0,000266% of happening!

That doesn't mean of course that Geryl is 100% right about his whole theory, but that his eq-theory and the way he predicts them actually works.
(end quote)

I guess we will just have to wait and see if there is Patrick is right again on November 22 (or 23).
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9253046

Thread: Right on cue a 6.8 earthquake

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 6)

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 6)

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 7)

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 7)

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 7)

Thread: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. (Page 7)

Thread: Right on cue a 6.8 earthquake (Page 2)

Thread: NOVEMBER 20 - 6 Plus Earthquake Will Occur - Patrick Geryl prediction

Thread: NOVEMBER 20 - 6 Plus Earthquake Will Occur - Patrick Geryl prediction

Thread: NOVEMBER 20 - 6 Plus Earthquake Will Occur - Patrick Geryl prediction

Thread: NOVEMBER 20 - 6 Plus Earthquake Will Occur - Patrick Geryl prediction

Thread: NOVEMBER 20 - 6 Plus Earthquake Will Occur - Patrick Geryl prediction

there, that should do it!

lol

Thread: LARGE 6.1 & 6.4 to Major 6.8 HITS CALIFORNIA & BAJA ON 113 WARNING, EXACT DATE/WINDOW, LEY LINES of 188 AND LOCATION of BAJA/ENSENADA WARNED!

Oh my....

The MATRIX of 113 Strikes again

The infamous 113 FINGERPRINT appears yet again now connected to the 2nd MAJOR QUAKE I warned about for my 12/12/12 warning window +-1 day for a Major Quake minimum 6.8 to appear.

The BANDA 7.1 was the FIRST direct hit for the warning...
Thread: 7.1 Quake in BANDA SEA hits within 1 day of 7+ Quake warning for 12/12/12 DIRECTLY ON 188 ENERGY LINE

now a 6.1 AND a 6.4 with readings hitting 6.8....

Friday, December 14, 2012 at 10:36:01 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
Friday, December 14, 2012 at 02:36:01 AM - Local Time at Epicenter

Standby for more details... Story and thread info developing

;)

Thread: EXACT DATE OF JAPAN 7.3 to 7.9 PREDICTED 3 HOURS BEFORE QUAKE! HITS DEAD CENTER ON 188 LEY LINES! WOW

Thread: TESLA, HAARP, CERN AND LHC DESIGN CONNECTED TO 188 LEY-LINE ENERGY GRID and STAR-TETRAHEDRON/MERKABA? WOW

Thread: BANDA SEA 7.1 to 7.3 REGISTERED AS a 7.8 in AUSTRALIA?!?! WTF? 6.2 QUAKE IN PARAGUAY NOT REGISTERED AT ALL ON USGS?!?

Thread: NEW MADRID MEGA-QUAKE ANNIVERSARY DECEMBER 16th 1811 CONNECTED TO MEGA-QUAKE WARNING DECEMBER 16th 2012, TWZ & 188 DAY CYCLE!?!

Thread: STATISTICAL MONTHLY AVERAGE OF MAGNITUDE 7+ QUAKES EXCEEDED IN ONLY FIRST 10 DAYS OF DECEMBER?!?!? SKEPTIC CHALLENGE PART 2!

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 12/14/2012 07:26 AM