UN's Promise to 'Save The World' In Return For Global Government

Nuke 'em till they glow. Bunch of commie
control freaks.

Nothing wrong with a kingdom of Heaven world government under Jesus.The Antichrist Talmud one won't work.

hahahahahahahaha...G-d help us!

the UN is trying to break up the United States of America
this would make them an enemy of the constitution
so, why are we harboring enemies in New York?

OOPSY!!!

This post actually belongs on another thread.....

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

My apologies :-)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


THE POLICE: CRIMINALS WITH A BADGE

*** Protection of child molesters and other criminals by corrupt Police and other Government Officials in Victoria (Australia) ****

- What follows is a copy of a document tendered before a Senate inquiry on 14th October 1997 in Melbourne -

..."Recently there has been substantial publicity given to protection of high-ranking officials who are also paedophiles or actively protecting paedophiles and other criminals in NSW. There is similar protection of these criminals in Victoria. Likewise for other states including South Australia and Western Australia"...

..."For some years known child molester Brett David Winduss, of Oswin Street, Kew, Victoria, was allowed to engage in serious criminal activity with full knowledge of government officials in Victoria.

Winduss's criminal activities had become known to authorities as far back as 1991, but he was allowed to continue for several reasons, including due to his being a rent-a-witness used by corrupt Police to prosecute innocent people of crimes they hadn't committed"...

..."It appears to be a common practice by Victorian Police to use known criminals as rent-a-witnesses in court cases against innocent accused (usually corruption whistleblowers), in order to secure convictions against them. In return the rent-a-witnesses are not prosecuted for their crimes which include serious matters such as drug trafficking, assaults, thefts, murders and child molesting"...

---

..."Nixon has substantial form for being biased against corruption whistleblowers, while at the same time being lenient on hardened criminals whose activities are often supported by corrupt Police"...

FULL REPORT:
[link to www.smuggled.com]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

*** Difficult issues ***

Police organizations must sometimes deal with the issue of police corruption, which is often abetted by a code of silence that encourages unquestioning loyalty to one's comrades over the cause of justice. In the comparatively rare event that an officer breaks this code on a significant scale, they may receive death threats or even be left for dead, as in the case of Frank Serpico. One way to fight such corruption is by having an independent or semi-independent organization investigate, such as (in the United States) the FBI, internal affairs, or the Justice Department. However, truly independent organizations are generally not called in except for the most openly severe cases.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

*** Code of silence ***

A Code of Silence is when someone, usually with some sort of authority of power, but not always, witnesses or is privy to the knowledge of an illegal or heinous act, but puts comradery, or loyalty to the "unit" (which can be police, military, gangs, among other things) above informing the public, or proper authorities.

The code of silence is usually either kept because of threat of force, or danger to oneself, or being branded a traitor or an outcast within the unit or organizaton as the experiences of the police whistleblower, Frank Serpico illustrates.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

*** Police and Protection ***

- Just Dial 911? The Myth of Police Protection -

By: Richard W. Stevens

..."Underlying all "gun control" ideology is this one belief. "Private citizens don't need firearms because the police will protect them from crime."
That belief is both false and dangerous for two reasons:

* First, the police cannot and do not protect everyone from crime.

* Second, the government and the police in most localities owe no legal duty to protect individuals from criminal attack. When it comes to deterring crime and defending against criminals, individuals are ultimately responsible for themselves and their loved ones. Depending solely on police emergency response means relying on the telephone as the only defensive tool. Too often, citizens in trouble dial 911 . . . and die"...

..."Practically speaking, it makes little sense to disarm the innocent victims while the criminals are armed. It is especially silly to disarm the victims when too often the police are simply unable to protect them. As Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, has observed: "Police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact."...

..."No Duty to Protect: It's not just that the police cannot protect you. They don't even have to come when you call. In most states the government and police owe no legal duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack. The District of Columbia's highest court spelled out plainly the "fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen."...

..."The law is similar in most states.
A Kansas statute precludes citizens from suing the government or the police for negligently failing to enforce the law or for failing to provide police or fire protection. A California law states that "neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for failure to establish a police department or otherwise provide police protection service."
As one California appellate court wrote, "police officers have no affirmative statutory duty to do anything.''...

..."Laying Bare the State Protection Myth: Government "social programs" and various mandatory "insurance" programs operate in the same way. First, the government programs distort the market forces that provide housing, food, medical care, transportation, and other goods and services. People shift to depending on the government programs instead of taking individual decisions and action.

When the government programs fail, however, the people relying on those programs have little or no effective recourse..."

FULL REPORT:
[link to www.libertyhaven.com]