MOD Request: Re-Ban the Obamanauts

Sometimes I do have to take a bit of time to make the distinction.

;o)

I wish it would go back to being more of a true conspiracy or mystery type forum, what it was before the hater/thread killers invaded.

It will...the election just passed. I've been here long enough to know the cycles and seasons of GLP. This shit is a phase.

The next power phase is fast approaching:

End of the Mayan Calendar.

:Your Kidding!!!!:

Canada does a lot of things right. I was reading up on politics in BC since I plan to move there. What is appealing is the fluidity of political parties, whereas we are stuck with the same stale R/D which can't even muster a plurality any more, but nothing will change since the media is part of the two-party system.

I'm still learning terms. The BC Liberals (separate from the federal liberal party) are certainly different from what that name means south of the border.

Excellent...

How can you ban a machine? There is software that enables their workers to adopt 100+ different personas. Not sure how many different addresses they can use but it would be trivial for them to have those as well.

And now we know that the great Obama Narwhal social network overwhelming device (Cass Sunstein's claim to fame) will be in full force repeating his teams' talking points to get their financial policies in place.

It's not just for election campaigns anymore (if it ever was)....

[link to news.yahoo.com]

They're just going to make the net as obnoxious and worthless as the teevee.

Wonder if we'll just go back to books?

(shrug)

What I've learned so far from Patriocracy.. something on which both sides agree.. is that Citizens United decision was a horrible decision and corruption of the democratic process.

------------

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions. The nonprofit group Citizens United wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton and to advertise the film during television broadcasts in apparent violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act or "BCRA").[2] In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that portions of BCRA §203 violated the First Amendment.
The decision reached the Supreme Court on appeal from a July 2008 decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Section 203 of BCRA defined an "electioneering communication" as a broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that mentioned a candidate within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary, and prohibited such expenditures by corporations and unions. The lower court held that §203 of BCRA applied and prohibited Citizens United from advertising the film Hillary: The Movie in broadcasts or paying to have it shown on television within 30 days of the 2008 Democratic primaries.[1][3] The Supreme Court reversed, striking down those provisions of BCRA that prohibited corporations (including nonprofit corporations) and unions from spending on "electioneering communications".[2]
The decision overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially overruled McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003).[4] The Court, however, upheld requirements for public disclosure by sponsors of advertisements (BCRA §201 and §311). The case did not involve the federal ban on direct contributions from corporations or unions to candidate campaigns or political parties, which remain illegal in races for federal office.[5]
...
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

For that we can blame the Supreme Court.

Fuckin' aye, I second this.

How about we leave free speech alone and let people say what they will without threats of bans?

"Free speech" does not include lies.

If you want to lie, like for example, to say how the Obama Recovery is working, or how the "Arab Spring" is a success, go lie somewhere else.

Well.. let's just look at the behavior of citizens at this time.. holiday spending is up more than 17% from last year. They must not be feeling too pessimistic afterall.

Fucking libtards. You simply cannot be educated by conventional means. Perhaps electricity and nipple clamps...

I'm glad most of those dirt bags are gone.....

Free Speech is all relative to the individual hearing/reading "whatever".

This site is whatever Trinity wants it to be and until a change is made, why don't we all behave with a little more maturity and discretion.

Short of out-and-out threats, the rest SHOULD be tolerated.

WTF is YOUR problem?

Let's here your argument in support of Citizen United, paid shill much?

If you voted for O, then you want this lack of freedom. It just doesn't suck when it doesn't affect you.

It's time to ban you obamanaught! Why are you even talking, your from Canada? What I have always questioned is why I have never heard anything about Canada on the news or anyone talking about it. I figure it out you allare shit head obamanauts. Freaking canada, what the hell is Canada, it's lik this huge landmass above America yet it might as well cease to exist cause that's what it feels like right now. Does Canada have anything? Seriously I never hear about Canada.....Do you guys even have a government?

I suppose you'd like me to read it out loud to you?

Citizens United and the Restoration of the First Amendment
[link to www.heritage.org]

Abstract: The right to engage in free speech--particularly political speech--and the right to freely associate are two of this nation's most important founding principles. That is why the Supreme Court's recent decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is so important: It protects these principles against those, including President Barack Obama, who favor a federal ban on independent political advocacy by corporations. Critics of the Citizens United holding justify their opposition with two claims: that the decision will allow foreign corporations to affect American elections and that shareholders must be protected from political expenditures by corporations in which they own shares. Close scrutiny, however, reveals that all of these concerns are, to borrow from Shakespeare, much ado about nothing. Beyond that, the proposed remedies raise serious constitutional concerns.

You're from Canada. Shut the fuck up.

I don't understand why you foreigners get such a hard on for who is or is not in office HERE IN AMERICA.

You can stop playing the racism card too, I don't give a fuck if he's black, most of us don't. We only care that he's a traitor, that he tramples all over our constitution and that he's a muzzie loving sonsabitch.

I'd vote for Allen West. He's much blacker than Obama.

Yes, the 60 million psychopaths who voted for Hussein are the same ones who are either on the government tit or digging themselves into the final credit card hole because they believe NBC and the other lying bastards who tell them that Obama has "saved or created" a bazillion jobs sweeping floors in the former Solynda manufacturing facility.

Ho, fucking, ho.

+1,000,000,000,000

I'm not so sure. I think things went past the point of no return on that one. This place is much more about the left-right paradigm, race and religion than anything else anymore. Its gone beyond a phase, and there seems to be a core group of paid members that seek to keep it that way. I'll believe it when I see it.

NO ....it reeks of a much needed FACIST and COMMIE CLEANOUT.

.....and the USA itself needs the same ban hammer slammed on it as well.
Send the Facists and Commies all over to North Korea and let them have a REAL taste of what they long for.



Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 11/24/2012 02:29 PM