Israel lobby calls for 'Iranian Pearl Harbour' | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 27907757 Australia 11/24/2012 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rayrayz User ID: 951476 United States 11/24/2012 06:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 27907757 Australia 11/24/2012 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28389315 United Kingdom 11/24/2012 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 27907757 Australia 11/24/2012 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't agree that Israel sucks at conventional war (1954, 1967 war, Yom Kippur, etc). But the problem with Iran is that Israeli tanks and aircraft can't simply cruise across Iraq and into enemy territory in Iran without serious resistance. I agree that it'd have to be a sneak attack against Iran. As for the US going to war with Israel though? No chance of that. Unless there was another USS Liberty incident. The ability to respond and get reenforcements sent to an event these days is much quicker and more efficient than it was back then. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28391947 United Kingdom 11/24/2012 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rayrayz User ID: 951476 United States 11/24/2012 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't agree that Israel sucks at conventional war (1954, 1967 war, Yom Kippur, etc). But the problem with Iran is that Israeli tanks and aircraft can't simply cruise across Iraq and into enemy territory in Iran without serious resistance. Quoting: The Tauremini I agree that it'd have to be a sneak attack against Iran. As for the US going to war with Israel though? No chance of that. Unless there was another USS Liberty incident. The ability to respond and get reenforcements sent to an event these days is much quicker and more efficient than it was back then. There is a resistance among the military to this ludicrous Israeli plan. It's the only reason it wasn't done in 2005. (Admiral Fallon) Hard to believe I know...and it's not because the Pentagon is on the side of Iran and against Israel...It's because it would be ridiculously dumb strategically to poke the hornets nest in the Middle East right now as they are trying to stabilize Iraq. The Israel/Jewish lobby in the US just keeps pressing on with the relentless propaganda though. The Russians and Chinese would stand to gain from a severely stretched out and impotent US military also...So they are probably hoping and wishing for the US to to take the bait. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel is actually in collusion with these countries either...It's how they roll. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28391947 United Kingdom 11/24/2012 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't agree that Israel sucks at conventional war (1954, 1967 war, Yom Kippur, etc). But the problem with Iran is that Israeli tanks and aircraft can't simply cruise across Iraq and into enemy territory in Iran without serious resistance. Quoting: The Tauremini I agree that it'd have to be a sneak attack against Iran. As for the US going to war with Israel though? No chance of that. Unless there was another USS Liberty incident. The ability to respond and get reenforcements sent to an event these days is much quicker and more efficient than it was back then. There is a resistance among the military to this ludicrous Israeli plan. It's the only reason it wasn't done in 2005. (Admiral Fallon) Hard to believe I know...and it's not because the Pentagon is on the side of Iran and against Israel...It's because it would be ridiculously dumb strategically to poke the hornets nest in the Middle East right now as they are trying to stabilize Iraq. The Israel/Jewish lobby in the US just keeps pressing on with the relentless propaganda though. The Russians and Chinese would stand to gain from a severely stretched out and impotent US military also...So they are probably hoping and wishing for the US to to take the bait. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel is actually in collusion with these countries either...It's how they roll. They are in collusion, they helped the transfer of intellectual property from West to East. Also why the Soviet Union was in Afghanistan. |
Rayrayz User ID: 951476 United States 11/24/2012 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't agree that Israel sucks at conventional war (1954, 1967 war, Yom Kippur, etc). But the problem with Iran is that Israeli tanks and aircraft can't simply cruise across Iraq and into enemy territory in Iran without serious resistance. Quoting: The Tauremini I agree that it'd have to be a sneak attack against Iran. As for the US going to war with Israel though? No chance of that. Unless there was another USS Liberty incident. The ability to respond and get reenforcements sent to an event these days is much quicker and more efficient than it was back then. There is a resistance among the military to this ludicrous Israeli plan. It's the only reason it wasn't done in 2005. (Admiral Fallon) Hard to believe I know...and it's not because the Pentagon is on the side of Iran and against Israel...It's because it would be ridiculously dumb strategically to poke the hornets nest in the Middle East right now as they are trying to stabilize Iraq. The Israel/Jewish lobby in the US just keeps pressing on with the relentless propaganda though. The Russians and Chinese would stand to gain from a severely stretched out and impotent US military also...So they are probably hoping and wishing for the US to to take the bait. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel is actually in collusion with these countries either...It's how they roll. They are in collusion, they helped the transfer of intellectual property from West to East. Also why the Soviet Union was in Afghanistan. Indeed... |