How the shills work: a basic guide to the ways of a shill

From a very good friend of mine, an accurate run down on the argumentative ways of a shill, as follows:

".... he adds implications through auto suggested. Pushing positional stance through "hot" words. If obama is used it is a "hot" word because it is a known perceptive variable that voting for an independant implies you're throwing a vote towards obama. It also sugjest that his percieved stance is romney. There is also other postulates throughout the post sugjesting "this" position. Therefore to engage with him you would limited stances to associated positionally.

.... Then he postulates dominence, through dismissel then backs it through opeing another spot of disposition creating a space for you to move to. That is leading. The percieved "bait" is not presented, he is simply providing you with an attractive position of disposition through auto sugjestion. "Offence$ you take "defence" he postulatizes through domanance for you to move into a desired position, then he goes for the kill with "dismissal". Before you have an opportunity to adjust to the space provided to return in "offence" he escapes."

I hope you may find this as helpful as I have, and can use this information in a productive manner fitting to get your message across without deception. My regards to you all,
EL