Gun BAN APPROVED by UN & Signed by Obama | |
| Old MacDonald Let's Go Buff-a-lo !!!! User ID: 22787734 11/26/2012 06:00 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ![]() Come and Take it BOB! Bitches "Socialism always Results in the Death of a Society as well as it's People" - Me "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" - Winston Churchill. What Part of "Shall Not be Infringed" Don't People Inside or Outside the U.S. Understand??? "Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State." -- Heinrich Himmler Sixty years later not much has changed. "I came to Ottawa with the firm belief that the only people in this country who should have guns are police officers and soldiers." --Allan Rock (Liberal SCUMBAG) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26104768 11/26/2012 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.cbsnews.com] [link to americannationalmilitia.com] [link to www.shtfplan.com] UN APPROVAL: [link to www.un.org] SIGNED BY OBAMA so what the Fuck does this matter to me and my Assault Rifles????? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26104768 11/26/2012 06:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| RF User ID: 1287633 11/26/2012 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AFGW User ID: 21140569 11/26/2012 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. |
| Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 11/26/2012 06:30 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. No....they would not agree. In any way, shape or form. 1) The Second Amendment is there for a SPECIFIC REASON....and isn't about hunting. 2) What part of "...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you have trouble comprehending? ![]() Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 11/26/2012 06:31 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20517650 11/26/2012 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21681843 11/26/2012 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1549678 11/26/2012 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Sir you are a disgrace!!!!Shall not infringe,there is no other interpitation. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24599086 11/26/2012 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| s. d. butler User ID: 974819 11/26/2012 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Overkill is in the eye of the beholder. Where does the comment about the crew served weapon even come from? Since no one is talking about such weapons. You sound like a Fudd. Do you understand the term slippery slope? The founders would not have agreed on a ban for semi automatic /automatic weapons. Loading speed isn't a criteria, civilians being armed with the same shoulder weapon as a government soldier is. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20574169 11/26/2012 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Patrick Bateman User ID: 28398103 11/26/2012 06:56 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BS, they will never peacefully take our guns here in PA. And esp on days like today, the 1st day of deer season with like a million and half armed hunters in the woods. Same with many other states, like Texas, Idaho, etc. I know states like NY, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc have lots of hunters that would not easily give up their guns. Waiter: "Would you like to hear today's specials?" Patrick Bateman: "Not if you want to keep your spleen." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24168145 11/26/2012 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28360307 11/26/2012 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. And to imagine you took the oath to serve and protect. Traitor! |
| ar-15 nut User ID: 1281306 11/26/2012 06:59 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| last one I just don't give a fuck User ID: 28412200 11/26/2012 07:02 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24168145 11/26/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Oyster User ID: 27088518 11/26/2012 07:05 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | when the 2nd amendment was written a solider and a civilian were on equal footing in terms of the weapons available to them. Last Edited by Oyster on 11/26/2012 07:08 PM glpuser81@gmail.com GLP isnt just for those who want to know, it is for those who want to know who wants to know. |
| Patrick Bateman User ID: 28398103 11/26/2012 07:06 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| tatmark1 User ID: 24827996 11/26/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I dont like obama at all but this but its not exactly something that will effect you or me I suggest reading it. now follow this link this is one that would effect us. [link to marketdailynews.com] Last Edited by tatmark1 on 11/26/2012 07:08 PM |
| s. d. butler User ID: 974819 11/26/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. And to imagine you took the oath to serve and protect. Traitor! Guy is a FUDD only worse as former military. [link to www.urbandictionary.com] FUDD The slang term for gun owners of what could be called limited tastes. They are thought of as being casual gun owners and not true supporters of the Second Amendment. These are the guys that Diane Feinstein is talking about when she talks about acceptable gun ownership. Two characteristics normally identify a FUDD. #1: Very limited range of shooting interests. A FUDD could have just 1 gun, or more than 153 guns, but all those guns fall within a very limited range of interests. The interest that defines a FUDD is "sporting purposes". All their 12 ga wood and blued steel shotguns, bolt action rifles, 44 magnum revolvers, and 9mm pistols only have one purpose: sport. These guns are either for hunting, or they are for marksmanship and trap competitions. Nothing they have is supposed to take the role of a dedicated defense gun, or a daily carry gun. Last Edited by s. d. butler on 11/26/2012 07:19 PM |
| SaltyFlats 11:11 Mayan Time User ID: 24240334 11/26/2012 07:10 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1711362 11/26/2012 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Then by your logic the entire constitution is invalid now. Your logic can be applied to all the amendments especially the 1st one. For example: "Free speech is harmful to us because it makes muslims mad and put our lives in dangers. Lets ban it. It was written at a time when there was no youtube and we didnt know muslims would go this nut over a movie." Yeah, let get rid of the entire constitution and turn that chicago thug into a dictator. Oh wait, he already has become one. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18267374 11/26/2012 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Fight for Truth User ID: 6302433 11/26/2012 07:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Guns don't kill people, people kill people, Governments historically kill the most people. they disarm them first if the people let them. The UN and Obama are both a Bad Joke. Both where manufactured by Cultists and have NO Constitutional Authority in America. THE United Nations Supports Illegal wars of aggression against any country the Illuminazzi's target. Kisinger and Obama Peace Prize winners, what a bad Joke. If the Government wants Wars or to take our guns let them go in person and invade, or try to take our guns in person, they won't because they are COWARDS who can only act brave when hiding behind their zombie warriors. Jesus will Judge the Evil Empire and those that serve it in all the Genocide being done to spread freedom and Liberty around the world at the point of a shell or bullet or bomb. |
| Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 11/26/2012 07:27 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Guns don't kill people, people kill people, Quoting: Fight for Truth 6302433 Governments historically kill the most people. they disarm them first if the people let them. The UN and Obama are both a Bad Joke. Both where manufactured by Cultists and have NO Constitutional Authority in America. THE United Nations Supports Illegal wars of aggression against any country the Illuminazzi's target. Kisinger and Obama Peace Prize winners, what a bad Joke. If the Government wants Wars or to take our guns let them go in person and invade, or try to take our guns in person, they won't because they are COWARDS who can only act brave when hiding behind their zombie warriors. Jesus will Judge the Evil Empire and those that serve it in all the Genocide being done to spread freedom and Liberty around the world at the point of a shell or bullet or bomb. Very true. Out of control governments kill people. ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17389107 11/26/2012 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Dude, as a Marine, you need to read the federalist papers, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The founding fathers put the second amendment in the Constitution in the event that the Federal Government over reached its powers and became tyrannical. The second amendment is for "the people" and states to over through the federal government. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27834799 11/26/2012 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17389107 11/26/2012 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |