| Users Online Now: 3,062 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,076,048 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,861,164 | Threads Today: 567 | Posts Today: 10,152 |
| 01:11 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 3,062 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,076,048 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,861,164 | Threads Today: 567 | Posts Today: 10,152 |
| 01:11 PM | ||
Gun BAN APPROVED by UN & Signed by Obama | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28430621  United States11/27/2012 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Marine, They're not called clips. There's no such thing as a CLIP you wannabe Leatherneck. They're called Magazines! Fuck yeah!!!!!!!!!!! Magazines...clips are for top loading rifles pretty much outdated these days but i use them on my mosin nagant. |
MHz User ID: 25505891  Canada11/27/2012 03:42 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| nocty User ID: 3965385 United States11/27/2012 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In this case robbery i think the pepper injects an intolerable pain into the eyes, that in turn, will cause so much stress on the crackpot that won't be able to stand up turn or aim. If you manage to spray all the bottle, the pain will be so unbearable his control will be lost. You then run away and call the police. Sure it is best Quoting: >:Aldabaran:< you are one funny italian man :) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1760050  South Africa11/27/2012 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You haven't been a victim of violent crime Have You? Countries differ because of various factors when it comes to crime. You'll see in Italy as poverty increases through austerity so will violent crime - also remember that most times crime stats are manipulated for political gain to name one reason. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1760050 In Italy, homicidal rates are so low, that on mainstream tv the talk shows and media talk about a single case for months, even years, this fashions goes over and over. I even got sick of listening. Lucky you and this is your reality...This is not the reality in most places in the world. Your reality doesn't hold the answers to the very real crime problem faced by less fortunate people daily, in fact your lack of experience in violent crime only muddies the water and makes life more dangerous for those whose reality is a violent world...have a heart and see this please. The reality is there is a war going on for the vast majority of less fotunate people and that war is the war against Victims...one side is heavily armed and prepared and the other most times unarmed and unprepared...Most Americans won't be murdered by Islamic terrorists next year... they will be murdered, raped, maimed and scared by Urban Terrorists...Americans are armed by their GVT in the war against Islamic terrorists, but for some reason their Government want's to disarm them against the real threat to their lives at home...Urban terrorism??? makes no sense. |
| AFGW User ID: 21140569 United States11/27/2012 03:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Marine, They're not called clips. There's no such thing as a CLIP you wannabe Leatherneck. They're called Magazines! Duh, I'm not talking to Marines...seems like I'm talking to a bunch of ID10t's. Clips are for handguns...magazines are for rifles. Wannabe Leatherneck, huh? If you'd like I could fax you my DD214. I don't have to prove shit to you anyway, the bad thing about this is that I served for you, and you're being a complete dick. Do you expect me to still call my sneakers "tenny runners" or my hat a "cover" or tell people that I need to "hit the head". I'm am a proud Gulf War Era Veteran and you need to "Lock it up!" |
| Redpaw360 User ID: 11235712 United States11/27/2012 03:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. No....they would not agree. In any way, shape or form.  1) The Second Amendment is there for a SPECIFIC REASON....and isn't about hunting. 2) What part of "...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you have trouble comprehending?  common sense. Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 27 The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BS, they will never peacefully take our guns here in PA. And esp on days like today, the 1st day of deer season with like a million and half armed hunters in the woods. Same with many other states, like Texas, Idaho, etc. Quoting: Patrick Bateman I know states like NY, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc have lots of hunters that would not easily give up their guns. Everyone I know is heavily armed, and all law-abiding. And not a single one of them would ever give up their arms, especially to a putrid, scrofulous, sick, demented, twisted, and evil "government", like the one we presently have. In fact, in case no one has noticed, people are buying arms and ammo at a record setting pace. A new record, just about every month. And many of the people I know, are practicing on blue balloons. About the same size as a blue helmet. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. And to imagine you took the oath to serve and protect. Traitor! The guy is a shill. Was never a Marine, but yes... A traitor. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States11/27/2012 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Dude, as a Marine, you need to read the federalist papers, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The founding fathers put the second amendment in the Constitution in the event that the Federal Government over reached its powers and became tyrannical. The second amendment is for "the people" and states to over through the federal government. In fact, Washington even referred to the 2nd amendment as the peoples "liberty teeth". In other words... No teeth, no liberty. And Washington is considered the FATHER of this country! Jefferson said: "A nation that expects to be ignorant and free, expects what never was, and never will be." |
| AFGW User ID: 21140569 United States11/27/2012 04:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. And to imagine you took the oath to serve and protect. Traitor! The guy is a shill. Was never a Marine, but yes... A traitor. Fuck you slimy civilian. I'm sorry I served for your stupid ass. And once again, I'm a woman...if you really read through the thread you would have known that, your just trolling. I may be many things...but a traitor I am not. Perhaps if you didn't quit school and moved out of yer mama's trailer...you'd git the gist of what I'm tryin ta say here. Go fuck a horse, jackass. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Sir you are a disgrace!!!!Shall not infringe,there is no other interpitation. You agree with a ban a certain weapons, but where does it stop. First it's what the government and media call assault weapons but if you look up the definition of an assault weapon it guns that you need a tax stamp to own. If we let them them ban semiautos than what pumps, lever actions, bolt actions. Where does it stop. When there done all we will be able to own is a single shot 22 and a single shot 410. If we give up our guns we might as well give up every amendment to the constitution. U say you were in the Usmc. All the marines I know would not give up any weapons they own cause they take there oath seriously. The very REASON that this country is in such a RIDICULOUS situation already, is because of continually deviating from the constitution! The very LAST thing we should be doing, is abandoning it FURTHER. Especially by screwing with the very amendment that says "Shall not be infringed". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There's only one reason why the elite are coming after your guns...because they are COMING AFTER THE CITIZENS and want you to have no defense when they come after you and lock down a new nazi police state. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26821087 If only everybody UNDERSTOOD that, then they wouldn't be ABLE to get away with it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | semi auto firearms are the only thing preventing absolute tyranny from taking hold of the population. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1531425 Look at what they've ALREADY done, with an ARMED population. NDAA anyone? Can you even IMAGINE what these "elitist" filth will be willing to do, to an UNARMED population? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. At the time it was written the 2nd amendment imparted citizens the right to the same weapons possessed by any military or anyone else. The reason for the 2nd amendment was not so you can shoot Bambi, it was to enable citizens to overthrow a future tyrannical government. You could not be anymore correct. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | read the UN treaty. it ONLY applies to international trafficking in arms. it specifically states that it is neither intended, nor can be applied to usurp the authority of signatory governments, nor their pre-existing laws or constitutional directives. now, as to the meaning of the second amendment, one need only realize the fact that until 1934, ANY person in the US could own ANY type of arm manufactured. it could be ordered, shipped, and delivered by any convenient means. you could own artillery, aerial bombs, any type of small arms. ANYTHING. it wasnt until america's favorite cross dressing ballroom dancer (j edgar hoover) convinced congress of the need to disarm the populace in the name of "law and order" that ANY federal restrictions on ownership were enacted. the 2nd amendment is about the populace having arms parity with the military, nothing less. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28147705 We've got ENOUGH laws. We only need to enforce the laws ALREADY on the books. There is an old saying: "If we can make but a few more laws, then we can ALL be criminals." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States11/27/2012 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Marine, They're not called clips. There's no such thing as a CLIP you wannabe Leatherneck. They're called Magazines! Fuck yeah!!!!!!!!!!! Magazines...clips are for top loading rifles pretty much outdated these days but i use them on my mosin nagant. Gun approved, cookie jar lid is off. Fight, I want to see blood and violence. Rip the lid off. I want to see the middle east rip and kill each other. Bomb each other. The bugger the drone the bigger the kill Blood, dead children, cities, oh ya. sic em Come on |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There's only one reason why the elite are coming after your guns...because they are COMING AFTER THE CITIZENS and want you to have no defense when they come after you and lock down a new nazi police state. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26821087 They mean to murder us. What other conclusion can one draw when government wants to disarm the people? And a government that makes it LEGAL to round up people that they merely "suspect" of a crime, and then deny them due process of law, lock them away forever, or even KILL them, if they so desire. Even Hitler and Stalin never put that kind of law on paper! |
| MHz User ID: 25505891 Canada11/27/2012 04:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| MHz User ID: 25505891 Canada11/27/2012 04:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm pretty sure they buried more than one that was able to say he was still alive, a holdover practice from the black death plague probably. The joke was 'He said he was still alive but you know how often that type lies.' and onto the honey wagon they went. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All Yap, the internet makes tough guys out of turds! Like with the Irs, citizens being unfairly taxed against the constitution. When 20 government officials comes in with the battle ram. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28563234 I'm SURE 95% of you emilitants AND ethugs WILL surrender peacefully or die a fool  ! The latter I prefer, killing 2 birds with 1 stone, by taking out the racist nut jobs, 2nd .... you fools leaving missy to us more masculine men of color to slay!   |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24938676  Australia11/27/2012 05:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. So you and your family will be totally out-gunned by the first band of crims with AKs and uzis when TSHTF. Way to go. Why can't people understand that crims are not going to care what is banned? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States11/27/2012 05:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. So you and your family will be totally out-gunned by the first band of crims with AKs and uzis when TSHTF. Way to go. Why can't people understand that crims are not going to care what is banned? Sic em |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. You fail miserably at why our founding fathers drafted the Constitution! The Constitution was drafted out of fear of repressive rogue over reaching Govt's, thus the insertion of the Second Amendment! I have a very hard time believing you were ever Marine!  "When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." "The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States11/27/2012 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any firearms legislation MUST be approved by congress. No crazy gun bans are going to make it through the House. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19672960 Don't panic. Doom off. What about Obama, and his magical E.O. pen? Shut Up! If he possess am EO pen, then we are all doomed. or not! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 05:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. This is OP's interpretation of the speech. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 2. Are govt. agencies gonna go door to door and confiscate these weapons? 3. If these weapons were bought legally, but are now deemed illegal, is the govt. going to reimburse citizens for the cost of the weapon if it is confiscated? 4. Does the govt. expect it's citizens to bring knives to a gunfight? 5. A ban on these weapons is just not going to work out well. My final point: The second amendment was written during a time when guns were a pain in the ass to load and fire...so maybe our founding Father's would agree to a ban on semi's and fully automatic weapons. Yes, I own weapons...I've shot every weapon the USMC has in it's arsenal...even got my name on a plaque on the M60 range in 29 palms. I don't believe that I'd need and M60 to protect my family however. Some of the weapons that are legal now are a bit overkill-so I'd agree to a ban on those. I don't agree to a ban on handguns with clips, six shooters, or bolt action rifles. Marine, They're not called clips. There's no such thing as a CLIP you wannabe Leatherneck. They're called Magazines! That's what I've been telling you. You won't find a single Marine who refers to them as "clips". The guy is NOT a Marine. The guy is a SHILL. I have ZERO doubt about that. |
| AFGW User ID: 21140569 United States11/27/2012 05:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank you s.d. Butler. I can't believe that comment was made by a marine. I would think if anyone would understand the true meaning of the 2nd amendment it would be him. Quoting: Oscanator 24421278 Don't buy the bullshit. The guy is a shill. One of MANY. Well, believe it. Right now it would seem as if you were infringing on my freedom of speech. It's funny how everyone who had something to say against me kept referring to me as a dude...when I've stated more than once that I am a woman. So...who's really the shill? Seems like there's a full moon and all the werehaters are out tonight. The second amendment says that we are entitled to the same firearms as the military...that would mean that I could go get a grenade launcher at my local army surplus store...better yet, I should go and get a handfull of grenades and some teargas...how about a SAW and 50cal while I'm at it. The reason why civilians shouldn't have these sorts of weapons is obvious...they are not properly trained in safety and may not be mentally stable enough. I never said that I agree on a ban on all weapons...I just believe that there are some weapons out there that will do more harm than good. But, alas, haters gonna hate. Call me a shill if you like...but I'll be damned if you deny the honor I earned to become a Marine. Hell, if you want to have an arsenal that would blow up a town, just head over to SC and hit up the firework outlets...you could do all sorts of things (like protect your family :/) with that stuff. I'm done with this hateful site for today. The lot of you can go shoot each other for all I care. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28564512 United States11/27/2012 05:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are a fucking IDIOT. Quoting: AFGW 21140569 The founding fathers intended that the citizenry be able to defend itself from TYRANNY, and even to rise up against tyranny if it became overbearing. Can you see it now? Fully automatic machine guns, against bolt action rifles. Pull your head out of your ass, shit-fer-brains. What if you use your head? Ever heard of Pepper Sprays?? [link to en.wikipedia.org] You don't need violence and machine guns to beat down a potential menace.... What do you mean, IF YOUR NEIGHBOUR BLARES EMINEM at FULL BLAST what you do, you KILL HIM??? Or maybe call the authorities? trasposed, just use a spray of pepper.... LOL!! I definitely can't take someone of your intellect seriously. Even for a Eurotard, you are an exceptional moron. |
