Pentagon Announces 'A human will always decide when a robot kills you'

some of you might feel this video is offensive and it is

the cute little HAT the monkey has on is covering up all the cords plugged into his brain


Brain Chip Implant in Monkey uses "Power Of Thought"

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

The U.S. military has made clear that any future robot weapons systems will always need manual authorisation before opening fire on human targets.

The Department of Defense issued a new policy directive saying that any semi-autonomous weapons systems will be designed so they need human authorisation to open fire.

The promise comes after a Human Rights Watch report called for an international ban on 'killer robots', which the group warned could be deployed within 20 years.

Soon after that report was published, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter signed a series of instructions 'to minimise failures that could lead to unintended engagements or to loss of control' of armed robots.

Policy directive 3000.09 says: 'Semi-autonomous weapon systems that are onboard or integrated with unmanned platforms must be designed such that, in the event of degraded or lost communications, the system does not autonomously select and engage individual targets or specific target groups that have not been previously selected by an authorised human operator.'

In order to make sure this is the case, the Pentagon asks that the hardware and software controlling robot weapons comes equipped with 'safeties, anti-tamper mechanisms, and information assurance'. They must also be designed to have proper 'human-machine interfaces and controls'.

Al Qaeda will probably follow that rule too, huh!

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

The U.S. military has made clear that any future robot weapons systems will always need manual authorisation before opening fire on human targets.

The Department of Defense issued a new policy directive saying that any semi-autonomous weapons systems will be designed so they need human authorisation to open fire.

The promise comes after a Human Rights Watch report called for an international ban on 'killer robots', which the group warned could be deployed within 20 years.

Soon after that report was published, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter signed a series of instructions 'to minimise failures that could lead to unintended engagements or to loss of control' of armed robots.

Policy directive 3000.09 says: 'Semi-autonomous weapon systems that are onboard or integrated with unmanned platforms must be designed such that, in the event of degraded or lost communications, the system does not autonomously select and engage individual targets or specific target groups that have not been previously selected by an authorised human operator.'

In order to make sure this is the case, the Pentagon asks that the hardware and software controlling robot weapons comes equipped with 'safeties, anti-tamper mechanisms, and information assurance'. They must also be designed to have proper 'human-machine interfaces and controls'.

so the monkey gets all that torture and pain and all he gets when he does the proper thing is a "drink of water"


Im sorry but its obvious that those who are learned have no morals or obligations to what is right. Im not an animal activist but that poor things existance must be one of the most horrible fates that an animal could have. This is what they want from us in the long run, do something right and we will give you water.

WORLD IS FUCKED IT IS RIPE FOR THE REAPING!

I'll take my chances with the robot over remote bureaucrats...

I hope you sheeple have picked out a cave in the Amazon jungle, because SKYNET is coming, no matter what.

No.
Matter.
What.

Seems like it should be the other way around. Little things like emotion, pride, envy, greed would not be a factor then.

So... The future is going to be what exactly?

1. The lawnmower man?

2. The Matrix?

3. Terminator?

4. The earth as a dark, cold, burned out ruin ala planet of the apes?


...I'm going with #4

"Pentagon Announces 'A human will always decide when a robot kills you'"




Hell... I'd almost prefer a robot making the decision.