|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
THE APOSTLE PAUL WAS NOT A REAL APOSTLE
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Understudy |
|
Post Content
|
The point is, Paul never substantiates the MYTH that Jesus was a great teacher or a miracle worker or born of a virgin, etc.
This is important, because Paul is reasonably supposed to have written his letters, whereas no one knows who wrote the "gospels".
Obviously, Jesus was a normal man who they elevated to the status of messiah, and they inserted this life he never lived and words he never said AFTER everyone who knew him was dead.
There is never any account, for example, how anyone knew that the devil tempted Jesus. The accounts of what was said on the cross and what happened at the tomb directly conflict, from one gospel to another.
Anyone who believes this shit is an idiot.
:thankgoddess:
Quoting: New Age Messiah so why did Peter make the transition into Pauls Gospel It's been a while since I read it, but I am pretty sure Peter never substantiates anything from the gospels, either. It's also reasonable to assume he wrote those letters. Obviously he was talked into "believing" some shit by Paul, and strikingly, Paul never expresses the slightest curiosity about anything Jesus said or did, yet Paul goes on to presume himself to be the "authority". Historically, Paul was immersed in pagan type spiritual indwelling type theology, or whatever, before he decided to start a new religion. The "fabric" of the idiot religion is not held together by anything other than the sucker's brainwashed mind. In one instance, the Bible writer just knew by divine providence, in others, the mistakes and contradictions are glaring and undeniable. It's the word of god but it's filled with human error. La di da. Seriously, what a waste of time. i will not waste my time on people who have no hope.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
