Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,590 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,613,065
Pageviews Today: 2,194,845Threads Today: 456Posts Today: 9,381
03:11 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

 
ItsMaKa2

User ID: 1151446
United States
11/27/2012 09:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

[link to www.scribd.com]


Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion



Published on Nov 25, 2012 by Gordon Duff
 Quoting: Free Leaks 271187




unfortunately

people don't give a fuck.


they got the iphone chargin, and new bling bling rims on the ride.

why the fuck would they care about that.


early social engineering is the cause....some might say
 Quoting: anti-agenda21


^ This ^ Very sad but very true. The mainstream could come full out with the truth and people in this country would care not...
YouTube Channel
[link to www.youtube.com]

US Nationwide Scanner Audio And Chat
[link to scancast.webs.com]
JBG
User ID: 28370659
United Kingdom
11/27/2012 09:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
baby

Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 11/27/2012 09:42 PM
Baconspiracist

User ID: 27008657
11/27/2012 09:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
we know flight 11 did not hit pentagon, however, that vid does not prove it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1246336


sad but true

clappa

Highpriest of the 108th Baconic Lodge in Hyperspace

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3647563
United States
11/27/2012 09:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659
clappa
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

[link to www.scribd.com]


Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion



Published on Nov 25, 2012 by Gordon Duff
 Quoting: Free Leaks 271187




unfortunately

people don't give a fuck.


they got the iphone chargin, and new bling bling rims on the ride.

why the fuck would they care about that.


early social engineering is the cause....some might say
 Quoting: anti-agenda21


It's not that we people give a fuck or not. The evidence is so mountainous nobody needs convincing anymore.

It is a FACT!!!

9/11 was an inside job.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28600556



tell that to the public then.


only 1-2 % of the total population of the world thinks that

good luck with the rest
 Quoting: anti-agenda21


you pulled that % out of your ass
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11076817
Canada
11/27/2012 09:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
it was a plane.

there are normal people who saw the plane you know.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1517542


Nobody saw a plane crash into the Pentagon idiot.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28609529


pity for you the ones who did have been on international media desribing what they saw, including pointing out the damage the plane caused to poles and such during its approach.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27375715


International media? Whoah it must be true then.Apologies for not believing the MSM media.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28600556
United States
11/27/2012 09:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

[link to www.scribd.com]


Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion



Published on Nov 25, 2012 by Gordon Duff
 Quoting: Free Leaks 271187




unfortunately

people don't give a fuck.


they got the iphone chargin, and new bling bling rims on the ride.

why the fuck would they care about that.


early social engineering is the cause....some might say
 Quoting: anti-agenda21


It's not that we people give a fuck or not. The evidence is so mountainous nobody needs convincing anymore.

It is a FACT!!!

9/11 was an inside job.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28600556



tell that to the public then.


only 1-2 % of the total population of the world thinks that

good luck with the rest
 Quoting: anti-agenda21


bsflag

They have done multiple surveys that show at least 33% of the US questions the official story.
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Shill? Hey fellow Aussie, I did CCUSA and was posted at Kamp Kiwanis is Rome, NY. Look it up.

Kamp Kiwanis is for underpriv. kids who get to spend the summer away from their problems. Because it was a year after September 11, kids who lost parents had a weeks free vaction.

You can call me a liar, but I know I am telling the truth.

You dickhead.
 Quoting: Rani 1659740


So your evidence is what children told you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11076817
Canada
11/27/2012 09:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659


Blah blah blah, anyone capable of rational and critical thought knows differently. Keep drinking the koolaid.
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

[link to www.scribd.com]


Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion



Published on Nov 25, 2012 by Gordon Duff
 Quoting: Free Leaks 271187


Jesus people

Really?

Are stupid do you have to be to think a plane did not hit the building?

bsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflagbsflag
 Quoting: endoftimes101


ridicule and dismissal = SHILL
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon


Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 11/27/2012 09:54 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28583377
United Kingdom
11/27/2012 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
So we all agreed that we will never ever get any truth out it... ever.

Good, we are squared then.
WeAreSlaves
maxemo.com

User ID: 11198781
Canada
11/27/2012 09:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659


How do you explain Building 7 and WTC1 & WTC2 for that matter? And don't BS with ''fires and jet fuel''...
Warning : The post above may be pure speculation.
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 09:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
it was a plane.

there are normal people who saw the plane you know.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1517542


Nobody saw a plane crash into the Pentagon idiot.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28609529


pity for you the ones who did have been on international media desribing what they saw, including pointing out the damage the plane caused to poles and such during its approach.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27375715


international media? you mean the one that said WTC7 collapsed 20 min before it actually did?

[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28467292
United States
11/27/2012 09:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
How does this prove there wasn't an aircraft?

It came in very low, low enough to take down streetlights.

The Pentagon is three stories (at least) high and you can't see that in the video either.

You'd have to know all the angles and heights to know for sure.

Also I think the aircraft was coming from the right side of the video...

where all the tree foliage is blocking the view.
 Quoting: G. House


Any plane that hits street lights wrecks their wing and any ability to continue on course.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28216119
United States
11/27/2012 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon

[link to www.scribd.com]


Hotel CCTV Video of 9 11 Pentagon Explosion



Published on Nov 25, 2012 by Gordon Duff
 Quoting: Free Leaks 271187

Proves nothing.
Plane would have been past that point before video starts.
Possum

User ID: 28432151
Australia
11/27/2012 10:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
I am an Australian who worked at a US summer camp in upstate NY a year after September 11. For a week, we had kids who lost their parents to the attacks, including the plane that hit the Pentagon. Are you telling me that these kids are liars? These kids were grief sticken and no amount of acting could have produced such emotion. Shame on you people to say that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon.
 Quoting: Rani 1659740



Not very smart are you?

A plane did NOT hit the Pentagon, and everyone with a brain can see the bleeding obvious.

So what DID happen to the passengers on the planes that 'disappeared' but did not crash?

THAT is what you SHOULD be asking.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


bump
There is no need for temples, no need for complicated philosophies. My brain and my heart are my temples; my philosophy is kindness.
Dalai Lama
Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.
Albert Einstein
The kingdom of God is within you and all around you. It is not within buildings of wood or stone. Split a piece of wood and you will find me. Look beneath a stone and I am there.
Stigmata
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1272733
United States
11/27/2012 10:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659


So you actually believe a man with little to no aviation training was able to pilot a massive passenger jet, traveling, at the very least, 180mph+ right before impact ; Descend, then proceed to level out a few stories off the ground and crash right into the side of the pentagon?

The amount of calculation that would of needed to be done miles before the actual crash, in my opinion, is beyond the mental capacity of somebody who has obviously been brain washed into religious extremity.

Let me ask you this.

Does that explosion look anything like the "steel melting" fireball that literally ripped through the WTC?

Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 10:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Whatever
Rani
User ID: 1659740
Australia
11/27/2012 10:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
What...am I part of the conspiracy too? What I know is that a group of American kids came to my camp, had lost parents to September 11 attacks and were full of real emotions.

Believe what you like, you can sit behind your computers and believe whatever crap people put up online. I experienced real kids, with real emotions who lost one or more parent/s to the attacks. That is my reality.

I would believe these kids over any idiot on GLP who believe a plane did not slam into the Pentagon.
IssueX

User ID: 14348632
United States
11/27/2012 10:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
So we all agreed that we will never ever get any truth out it... ever.

Good, we are squared then.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28583377


pretty much sums it up

I gotta say, however, one of my fav from way back then was this one, except that back when people thought only GWB was bad and the other team were the white hats

now we know they both suck and the game is pretty much over, and the best solution is to cultivate a drinkng habit...

but ah, nostalgia:

The looniest of all 9/11 conspiracy theories

“Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories,” President Bush stated amid increasingly loud accusations that his administration may have allowed the tragic events of 9/11 to occur as a pretext justifying U.S. expansion of armed conflict around the world to allegedly wage war on terrorism. Curiously, most of the “outrageous conspiracy theories” to which he refers incorporate some extremely sound science, logic and witness testimony where the official version is lacking in those critical areas. The following is a rather clever and immensely sarcastic approach to the government's explanation of 9/11 -- which follows a pattern established by the “magic bullet theory” to explain the assassination of JFK and a Ryder truck full of fertilizer and fuel oil to explain the damage at the Murrah federal building in OK City.

by Gerard Holmgren

Astute observers of history are aware that for every notable event there will usually be at least one ,often several wild conspiracy theories which spring up around it. “The CIA killed Hendrix”; “the Pope had John Lennon murdered”; “Hitler was half Werewolf”; “Space aliens replaced Nixon with a clone,” etc, etc. The bigger the event, the more ridiculous and more numerous are the fanciful rantings which circulate in relation to it.

So its hardly surprising that the events of Sept. 11, 2001, have spawned their fair share of these ludicrous fairy tales. And as always, there is -- sadly -- a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis.

One of the wilder stories circulating about Sept 11 (and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs) is that it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they “hate our freedoms.”

Never a group of people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the Internet and the media to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell.

Normally I don't even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational analysis, in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such silly conspiracy theories.

These crackpots even contend that the extremist Bush regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them and actually would have stopped them if it had been able. Blindly ignoring the stand down of the U.S. Air Force, the insider trading on airline stocks (linked to the CIA), the complicit behavior of Bush on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, the conspiracy theorists stick doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers somehow managing to commandeer four planes simultaneously and fly them around U.S. airspace for nearly two hours, crashing them into important buildings, without the U.S. intelligence services having any idea that it was coming, and without the Air Force knowing what to do.

The daunting task of analysis

The huge difficulties with such a stupid story force them to invent even more preposterous stories to distract from its core silliness, and thus the tale has escalated into a mythic fantasy of truly gargantuan proportions.

It's difficult to apply rational analysis to such unmitigated stupidity, but that is the task which I take on in this article. However, it should be noted that one of the curious characteristics of conspiracy theorists is that they effortlessly change their so called evidence in response to each aspect which is debunked. As soon as one delusion is unmasked, they simply invent another to replace it and deny that the first ever existed. Eventually, when they have turned full circle through this endlessly changing fantasy fog , they then reinvent the original delusion and deny that you ever debunked it, thus beginning the circle once more. This technique is known as “the fruit loop” and saves the conspiracy theorist from ever having to see any of their ideas through to their (ill)logical conclusions.

The fruit loop

According to the practitioners of the fruit loop, 19 Arabs took over the four planes by subduing the passengers and crew through the use of guns, knives, box cutters and gas, and then used electronic guidance systems which they had smuggled on board to fly the planes to their targets.

The suspension of disbelief required for this outrageous concoction is only for the hard core conspiracy theorist. For a start, they conveniently skip over the awkward fact that there weren't any Arabs on the planes.

If there were, one must speculate that they somehow got on board without being filmed by any of the security cameras and without being registered on the passenger lists. But the curly question of how they are supposed to have got on board is all too mundane for the exciting world of the conspiracy theorist.

Who's on first?

With vague mumblings that they must have been using false ID (but never specifying which IDs they are alleged to have used, or how these were traced to their real identities), they quickly bypass this problem, to relate exciting and sinister tales about how some of the fictitious fiends were actually searched before boarding because they looked suspicious.

However, as inevitably happens with any web of lies, this simply paints them into an even more difficult corner. How are they supposed to have gotten on board with all that stuff if they were searched? And if they used gas in a confined space, they would have been affected themselves unless they also had masks in their luggage.

“Excuse me sir, why do you have a boxcutter, a gun, a container of gas, a gas mask and an electronic guidance unit in your luggage?”

“A present for your grandmother? Very well sir, on you get.”

“Very strange,” thinks the security officer. “That's the fourth Arabic man without an Arabic name who just got on board with a knife, gun or boxcutter and gas mask. And why does that security camera keep flicking off every time one these characters shows up? Must be one of those days I guess...”

Asking any of these basic questions to a conspiracy theorist is likely to cause a sudden leap to the claim that we know that they were on board because they left a credit card trail for the tickets they had purchased and cars they had rented. So, if they used credit cards that identified them, how does that reconcile with the claim that they used false IDs to get on to the plane?

But by this time, the fruit loop is in full swing, as the conspiracy theorist tries to stay one jump ahead of this annoying and awkward rational analysis. They will allege that the hijackers' passports were found at the crash scenes. “So there!” they exalt triumphantly, their fanatical faces lighting up with that deranged look of one who has just experienced a revelation of questionable sanity.

Hmm? So they got on board with false IDs but took their real passports with them? However, by this time the fruit loop has been completely circumnavigated, and the conspiracy theorist exclaims impatiently, “Who said anything about false IDs? We know what seats they were sitting in! Their presence is well documented!”

And so the whole loop starts again. “Well, why aren't they on the passenger lists?”

“You numbskull! They assumed the identities of other passengers!” And so on...

Finally, out of sheer fascination with this circular method of creative delusion, the rational sceptic will allow them to get away with this loop, in order to move on to the next question, and see what further delights await us in the unraveling of this marvelously stupid story.

“Uh, how come their passports survived fiery crashes that completely incinerated the planes and all the passengers?”

The answer of course is that its just one of those strange coincidences, those little quirks of fate that do happen from time to time. You know, like the same person winning the lottery four weeks in a row. The odds are astronomical, but these things do happen...

This is another favourite deductive method of the conspiracy theorist. The “improbability drive,” in which they decide upon a conclusion without any evidence whatsoever to support it, and then continually speculate a series of wildly improbable events and unbelievable coincidences to support it, shrugging off the implausibility of each event with the vague assertion that sometimes the impossible happens (just about all the time in their world).

There is a principle called “Occam's razor” which suggests that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the simplest explanation is most likely to be correct. Conspiracy theorists hate Occam's razor.

Hijacking 101

Having for the sake of amusement, allowed them to get away with the silly story of the 19 invisible Arabs, we move on to the question of how they are supposed to have taken over the planes.

Hijacking a plane is not an easy thing to do. Hijacking it without the pilot being able to alert ground control is nearly impossible. The pilot has only to punch in a four digit code to alert ground control to a hijacking. Unconcerned with the awkward question of plausibility, the conspiracy buffs maintain that on that Sept 11, the invisible hijackers took over the plane by the rather crude method of threatening people with boxcutters and knives, and spraying gas (after they had attached their masks, obviously), but somehow took control of the plane without the crew first getting a chance to punch in the hijacking code. Not just on one plane, but on all four. At this point in the tale, the conspiracy theorist is again forced to call upon the services of the improbability drive.

So now that our incredibly lucky hijackers have taken control of the planes, all four pilots fly them with breathtaking skill and certainty to their fiery end -- all four unflinching in their steely resolve for a swift meeting with Allah.

Apart from their psychotic hatred of “our freedoms,” it was their fanatical devotion to Islam which enabled them to summon up the iron will to do this. Which is strange, because according to another piece of hearsay peddled by the conspiracy buffs, these guys actually went out drinking and womanizing the night before their great martyrdom, even leaving their Korans in the bar -- really impeccable Islamic behavior -- and then got up at 5 a.m. the next morning to pull off the greatest covert operation in history.

This also requires us to believe that they were even clear headed enough to learn how to fly the huge planes by reading flight manuals in Arabic in the car on the way to the airport. We know this because they supposedly left the flight manuals there for us to find.

It gets better. Their practical training had allegedly been limited to Cessnas and flight simulators, but this was no barrier to the unflinching certainty with which they took over the planes and skillfully guided them to their doom.

If they are supposed to have done their flight training with these tools, which would be available just about anywhere in the world, its not clear why they would have decided to risk blowing their cover to U.S. intelligence services by doing the training in Florida, rather than somewhere in the Middle East, but such reasoning is foreign to the foggy world of the conspiracy theorist, too trapped in the constant rotation of the mental fruit loop to make their unsubstantiated fabrications seem even semi-believable.

A Ryder truck with wings?

Having triumphantly established a circular delusion in support of the mythical Arabs, the conspiracy theorist now confronts the difficult question of why there's nothing left of the planes. Anybody who has seen the endlessly replayed footage of the second plane going into the WTC will realize that the plane was packed with explosives. Planes do not and cannot blow up into nothing in that manner when they crash.

Did the mythical Arabs also haul a huge heap of explosives on board, and manage to deploy them in such a manner that they went off in the exact instant of the crash, completely vapourizing the plane?

This is a little difficult even for the conspiracy theorist, who at this point decides that its easier to invent new laws of physics in order to keep the delusion rolling along.

There weren't any explosives. It wasn't an inside job. The plane blew up into nothing from its exploding fuel load! Remarkable!

Sluggishly combustible jet fuel, which is basically kerosene and which burns at a maximum temperature of around 800 C, has suddenly taken on the qualities of a ferociously explosive demolition agent, vapourizing 65 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke. Never mind that a plane of that size contains around 15 tons of steel and titanium, of which even the melting points are about double that of the maximum combustion temperature of kerosene -- let alone the boiling point -- which is what would be required to vapourize a plane. And then there's about 50 tons of aluminium to be accounted for.

In excess of 15 pounds of metal was vapourized for each gallon of kerosene.

For the conspiracy theorist, such inconvenient facts are vaguely dismissed as “mumbo jumbo.”

This convenient little phrase is their answer to just about anything factual or logical. Like a conjurer pulling a rabbit out of a hat, they suddenly become fanatically insistent about the devastating explosive qualities of kerosene, something hitherto completely unknown to science, but just discovered by them, at that very moment. Blissfully ignoring the fact that never before or since in aviation history has a plane vapourized into nothing from an exploding fuel load, the conspiracy theorist relies upon Hollywood images, where the effects are always larger than life, and certainly larger than the intellects of these cretins.

“Its a well known fact that planes blow up into nothing on impact,” they state with pompous certainty. “Watch any Bruce Willis movie.”

“Care to provide any documented examples? If it's a well known fact, then presumably this well known fact springs from some kind of documentation -- other than Bruce Willis movies?”

At this point the mad but cunning eyes of the conspiracy theorist will narrow as they sense the corner that they have backed themselves into, and plan their escape by means of another stunning backflip.

“Ah, but planes have never crashed into buildings before, so there's no way of telling,” they counter with a sly grin.

Well, actually planes have crashed into buildings before (and since). None of them vapourized into almost nothing.

“But not big planes, with that much fuel,” they shriek in hysterical denial.

Or that much metal to vapourize.

“Yes but not hijacked planes!”

“Are you suggesting that whether the crash is deliberate or accidental affects the combustion qualities of the fuel?”

“Now you're just being silly.”

Although collisions with buildings are rare, planes frequently crash into mountains, streets, other aircraft, nosedive into the ground, or have bombs planted aboard them, and don't vapourize into nothing. What's so special about a tower that's mostly glass? But by now, the conspiracy theorist has once again sailed happily around the fruit loop. “Its a well documented fact that planes explode into nothing on impact.”

Effortlessly weaving back and forth between the position that its a “well known fact” and that “its never happened before, so we have nothing to compare it to,” the conspiracy theorist has now convinced themselves (if not too many other people) that the WTC plane was not loaded with explosives, and that the instant vapourization of the plane in a massive fireball was the same as any other plane crash you might care to mention. Round and round the fruit loop...

The “new math”

But the hurdles which confront the conspiracy theorist are many, and they are now forced to implement even more creative uses for the newly discovered shockingly destructive qualities of kerosene. They have to explain how the Arabs also engineered the elegant vertical collapse of both the WTC towers, and for this awkward fact the easiest counter is to simply deny that it was a controlled demolition, and claim that the buildings collapsed from fire caused by the burning kerosene.

For this, its necessary to sweep aside the second law of thermodynamics and propose kerosene, which is not only impossibly destructive, but also recycles itself for a second burning in violation of the law of degradation of energy.

You see, it not only consumed itself in a sudden catastrophic fireball, vapourizing a 65-ton plane into nothing, but then came back for a second go, burning at 2000 degrees C for another hour at the impact point, melting the skyscraper's steel like butter. And, while it was doing all this, it also poured down the elevator shafts, starting fires all through the building.

When I was at school there was a little thing called the entropy law which suggests that a given portion of fuel can only burn once, something which is readily observable in the real world, even for those who didn't make it to junior high school science. But this is no problem for the conspiracy theorist. Gleefully, they claim that a few thousand gallons of kerosene is enough to:

1. completely vapourize a 65 ton aircraft;

2. have enough left over to burn ferociously enough for over an hour at the impact point to melt steel ( melting point about double the maximum combustion temperature of the fuel );

3. still have enough left over to pour down the elevator shafts and start similarly destructive fires all throughout the building.

This kerosene really is remarkable stuff! How chilling to realize that those kerosene heaters we had in the house when I was a kid were deadly bombs, just waiting to go off. One false move and the entire street might have been vapourized. And never again will I take kerosene lamps out camping. One moment you're there innocently holding the lamp, the next moment -- kapow! Vapourized into nothing along with the rest of the camp site, and still leaving enough of the deadly stuff to start a massive forest fire.

These whackos are actually claiming that the raging inferno allegedly created by the miraculously recycling, and impossibly hot burning kerosene melted or at least softened the steel supports of the skyscraper. Oblivious to the fact that the smoke coming from the WTC was black, which indicates an oxygen starved fire and, therefore, not particularly hot, they trumpet an alleged temperature in the building of 2000 C , without a shred of evidence to support this curious suspension of the laws of physics.

Not content with this ludicrous garbage, they then contend that as the steel frames softened, they came straight down instead of buckling and twisting and falling sideways.

Laws be damned

Since they've already re-engineered the combustion qualities of jet fuel, violated the second law of thermodynamics, and redefined the structural properties of steel, why let a little thing like the laws of gravity get in the way?

The tower fell in a time almost identical to that of a free-falling object, dropped from that height, meaning that it's physically impossible for it to have collapsed by the method of the top floors smashing through the lower floors.

But, according to the conspiracy theorists, the laws of gravity were temporarily suspended on the morning of Sept 11. It appears that the evil psychic power of those dreadful Arabs knew no bounds. Even after they were dead, they were able, by the power of their evil spirits, to force down the tower at a speed physically impossible under the laws of gravity, had it been meeting any resistance from fireproofed steel structures originally designed to resist many tons of hurricane force wind -- as well as the impact of a Boeing passenger jet straying off course.

Clearly, these conspiracy nuts never did their science homework at school, but did become extremely adept at inventing tall tales for why they couldn't complete their assignments.

“Muslim terrorists stole my notes, sir”

“No miss, the kerosene heater blew up and vapourized everything in the street, except for my passport.”

“You see sir, the school bus was hijacked by Arabs who destroyed my homework because they hate our freedoms.”

Or perhaps they misunderstood the term “creative science” and mistakenly thought that coming up with such rubbish was in fact, their science homework.

The ferocious heat generated by this ghastly kerosene was, according to the conspiracy theorists, the reason why so many of the WTC victims can't be identified. DNA is destroyed by heat. (Although 2000 C isn't really required, 100 degrees C will generally do the job).

This is quite remarkable, because according to the conspiracy theorist, the nature of DNA suddenly changes if you go to a different city.

Not all DNA created equal

That's right! If you are killed by an Arab terrorist in NY, your DNA will be destroyed by such temperatures. But if you are killed by an Arab terrorist in Washington DC, your DNA will be so robust that it can survive temperatures which completely vapourize a 65-ton aircraft.

You see, these loonies have somehow concocted the idea that the missile which hit the pentagon was not a missile at all, but one of the hijacked planes. And to prove this unlikely premise, they point to a propaganda statement from the Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane.

“The plane was vapourized by the fuel tank explosion,” maintain these space loonies, but only one of the people inside it were not identified by DNA testing.

So there we have it. The qualities of DNA are different, depending upon which city you're in, or perhaps depending upon which fairy story you're trying to sell at any particular time.

Missiles have wings, too

This concoction about one of the hijacked planes hitting the Pentagon really is a howler. For those not familiar with the layout of the Pentagon, it consists of five rings of building, each with a space in between. Each ring of building is about 30 to 35 feet deep, with a similar amount of open space between it and the next ring.

The object which penetrated the Pentagon went in at about a 45 degree angle, punching a neat, circular hole about 12 feet in diameter through three rings (six walls).

A little later a section of wall about 65 feet wide collapsed in the outer ring. Since the plane, which the conspiracy theorists claim to be responsible for the impact, had a wing span of 125 feet and a length of 155 feet and there was no wreckage of the plane, either inside or outside the building, and the lawns outside were still smooth and green enough to play golf on, this crazy delusion is clearly a physical impossibility.

But hey, we've already disregarded the combustion qualities of jet fuel, the normal properties of common building materials, the properties of DNA, the laws of gravity and the second law of thermodynamics, so what the hell -- why not throw in a little spatial impossibility as well?

I would have thought that the observation that a solid object cannot pass through another solid object without leaving a hole at least as big as itself is reasonably sound science. But to the conspiracy theorist, this is “mumbo jumbo.” It conflicts with the delusion that they're hooked on, so it “must be wrong” although trying to get them to explain exactly how it could be wrong is a futile endeavour.

Conspiracy theorists fly into a curious panic whenever the Pentagon missile is mentioned. They nervously maintain that the plane was vapourized by it's exploding fuel load and point to the WTC crash as evidence of this behavior (That is a wonderful fruit loop).

Like an insect which has just been sprayed, running back and forth in its last mad death throes, they first argue that the reason the hole is so small is that the plane never entered the wall, having blown up outside, and then suddenly backflip to explain the 250 feet deep missile hole by saying that the plane disappeared all the way into the building, and then blew up inside the building (even though the building shows no sign of such damage).

As for what happened to the wings, here's where they get really creative. The wings snapped off and folded into the fuselage which then carried them into the building, which then closed up behind the plane like a piece of meat.

When it suits them, they'll also claim that the plane slid in on its belly, (ignoring the undamaged lawn) while at the same time citing alleged witnesses to the plane diving steeply into the building from an “irrecoverable angle.”

How they reconcile these two scenarios as being compatible is truly a study in applied stupidity.

Epilogue

Once they get desperate enough, you can be sure that the UFO conspiracy stuff will make an appearance. The Arabs are in league with the Martians. Space aliens snatched the remains of the Pentagon plane and fixed most of the hole in the wall, just to confuse people. They gave the Arabs invisibility pills to help get them onto the planes. Little green men were seen talking to Bin Laden a few weeks prior to the attacks.

As the nation gears up to impeach the traitor Bush, and stop his perpetual oil war, it's not helpful to have these idiots distracting from the process by spreading silly conspiracy theories about mythical Arabs, stories which do nothing but play into the hands of the extremist Bush regime.

At a less serious time, we might tolerate such crackpots with amused detachment, but they need to understand that the treachery that was perpetrated on Sept. 11, and the subsequent war crimes committed in “retaliation” are far too serious for us to allow such frivolous self indulgence to go unchallenged.

Those who are truly addicted to conspiracy delusions should find a more appropriate outlet for their paranoia.

Its time to stop loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11.

Last Edited by IssueX on 11/27/2012 10:10 PM
doomsucker
WORLD

User ID: 28017267
United States
11/27/2012 10:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Looks like the A-typical air strike....
'Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason.' - Mark Twain

sheep1sheeeeeeeeeppepe
WeAreSlaves
maxemo.com

User ID: 11198781
Canada
11/27/2012 10:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
What...am I part of the conspiracy too? What I know is that a group of American kids came to my camp, had lost parents to September 11 attacks and were full of real emotions.

Believe what you like, you can sit behind your computers and believe whatever crap people put up online. I experienced real kids, with real emotions who lost one or more parent/s to the attacks. That is my reality.

I would believe these kids over any idiot on GLP who believe a plane did not slam into the Pentagon.
 Quoting: Rani 1659740


Get over yourself, you're not even looking at it with the right angle.

Wake UP!
Warning : The post above may be pure speculation.
Anonymous
User ID: 20575401
United States
11/27/2012 10:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
This is old news to me. I already discovered this at least 3-4 yrs ago..............


Thanks anyway!


Kudos
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24182468
United States
11/27/2012 10:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


My Q:
Where is the retaliation for striking the most sensitive and protected site in the US?
A veritable symbol of our Military Might?
None.
A nukeworthy item, ignored.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28370659
United Kingdom
11/27/2012 10:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659


How do you explain Building 7 and WTC1 & WTC2 for that matter? And don't BS with ''fires and jet fuel''...
 Quoting: WeAreSlaves


Fires and jet fuel are perfectly plausible - but if they really wanted to make sure it came down - all they would have needed to have done was weakened or blown just a few main columns. As for WT7 that certainly came down as a result of falling debris from the towers and fires.

All this BS about freefall speeds, bombs in the basement, nano thermate etc etc is from people who are too flakey, or ignorant to realise how ignorant they are - it does make perfect disinfo cover though, to taint the whole subject as belonging to complete loony land - that nobody with any reputation will want to go within a mile of publicly asking awkward questions about it.
Dr.DoomLittle

User ID: 6231580
United States
11/27/2012 10:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
What...am I part of the conspiracy too? What I know is that a group of American kids came to my camp, had lost parents to September 11 attacks and were full of real emotions.

Believe what you like, you can sit behind your computers and believe whatever crap people put up online. I experienced real kids, with real emotions who lost one or more parent/s to the attacks. That is my reality.

I would believe these kids over any idiot on GLP who believe a plane did not slam into the Pentagon.
 Quoting: Rani 1659740


yeah you said that 3 x already

nice story. cops lie.
Christian Fighter

User ID: 28541745
Brazil
11/27/2012 10:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
This shit again?
putin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14997497
United States
11/27/2012 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
Well even without this video, ask yourself this.

The Pentagon is one of the most sensitive military sites in the US - you know it has tons of security cameras pointed everywhere to identify intruders.

So if a plane really did hit, it would be easy enough for them to produce Pentagon video footage from that time period clearly showing the incoming aircraft.

The lack of any such footage is the smoking gun.

You mean to tell me not ONE of their surveillance cameras captured the incoming plane?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18713240


Security cameras are pointed at doorways carparks etc not watching the skies, they tend to be mounted high up pointing down with a narrow field of view and a low refresh rate. They are intended to identify faces, numberplates at shortish range - a plane travelling at 400 mph passes through their field of view in a flash - you will be lucky to capture anything and then it will not be an 'image' it will be a blurry streak of something unidentifiable.

More than that - for high level conspirators to plan an operation like this, with a cruise missile - and then intend to simply pass it off as a plane is so ludicrously risky, complicated, difficult and immprobable as to be certifiably insane!

Much simpler to just use a F**KING REAL PLANE!

Even simpler to let a bunch of real muslim jihadists go through with a terror plot! - all you have to do is run a little interference and pretend not to notice all the intel clues that they were plotting just such a thing.
 Quoting: JBG 28370659


The PENTAGON has thousands of cameras watching IT.... from all angles. If it was in fact a plane, we would have been shown it over and over just to drum the fucking bullshit terror into our heads as they did w/the towers. It takes little to nothing to pull this off with a programmable missile in the right hands...program could be written by one person, executed by someone else. Programmer thinks it's a game, has no IDEA it was for real. It's called compartmentalization. Used to keep us military personnel ignorant of exactly what we are doing. It takes an EXTREMELY skilled pilot to even come close to pulling this off w/a jet... as a matter of FACT, I know NONE who admit they could do it on their best day. Wake up folks. There is WAY TOO much that does not add up in this 911 story. I do not know what the truth is but for sure, the line fed to us is WAAAYYYYYY off.... so far off it's absurd. Which means the people feeding the line are hiding something. EVERYONE knows this in their gut. Cognitive dissonance keeps many believing the fed line. Many just ignore it because it would shatter their reality. The folks pushing the lie count on these reactions.

News