|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon
|
|
Poster Handle
|
MindShaft |
|
Post Content
|
How does this prove there wasn't an aircraft?
It came in very low, low enough to take down streetlights.
The Pentagon is three stories (at least) high and you can't see that in the video either.
You'd have to know all the angles and heights to know for sure.
Also I think the aircraft was coming from the right side of the video...
where all the tree foliage is blocking the view.
Quoting: G. House have you watched the doc in plane site? personally imo just according to the way your talking here, i don't think you have. because if you did, you certainly would not be talking the way you are... good doc, not long either. about 75 minutes blunt and to the point, if you can handle it Just saying what and what not can be seen in the friggen video that's been presented. Notice that you can see vehicles moving on an elevated highway? You can't see the Pentagon in that video. The aircraft hit the Pentagon very low at a very shallow angle. You wouldn't expect to see it in this video. This video does not in any shape or form PROVE what you people claim. The Pentagon security video DOES show the aircraft before it hits. THAT camera has an extreme wide angle lens which YOU guys don't take into account. It's pointless to argue this with YOU guys as YOU people made up your mind regardless of especially the eyewitness accounts of people who describe the airliner hitting the building. The airliner also took down street light poles as it came in. YOUR missile that you claim hit the building would not have had the mass needed to do that without exploding the ordinance it would carry. Have you ever attended the aftermath of a plane crash? Have you ever walked through a crashed passenger jet 'debris field'? Tell us about your experiences ...
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
