| Users Online Now: 2,069 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 916,624 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,711,681 | Threads Today: 835 | Posts Today: 14,790 |
| 07:04 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,069 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 916,624 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,711,681 | Threads Today: 835 | Posts Today: 14,790 |
| 07:04 PM | ||
US envoy Susan Rice admits Benghazi attack error | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25091961  United States11/28/2012 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KoFFee_  User ID: 1373078 United States11/28/2012 08:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Susan Rice's hopes of becoming new Secretary of State in doubt Barack Obama's hopes of appointing Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the United Nations, as America's new Secretary of State suffered a significant blow on Tuesday after three senior Republican senators promised to block her nomination. Read more here: [link to www.telegraph.co.uk] However, I consider my life worth nothing to me; my only aim is to finish the race and complete the task the Lord Jesus has given me—the task of testifying to the good news of God’s grace. Acts 20:24 "This man really is the Savior of the world!" John 4:42 Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen. I am the Alpha and the Omega, " says the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." Revelation 1:7 |
| davvi User ID: 3677166 United States11/28/2012 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 The CIA fed her the intel. So she is an "innocent" functionary. BULLLLLLLLLSHIT! There are only TWO people who had the power to send her out with the Sunday morning show line of POOP. Here's a clue for you...because you have NONE. I am just taking her word for it,,, her first reaction to a conflicting storyline with the State Dept. You have to admit that the US UN spokesperson is out of the loop when it comes to more powerful positions. CIA Patraues, Obama and or Clinton,,, it swirls around them.. Anyway, your conclusion that Rice should be guilty with the rest is just conjecture. And seems influenced by your politics. The whole scandal seems rather contrived, stemming over press releases and what the Admin and or CIA wanted the public to know,,, a minor screw up. A rather small pebble shadowing a much larger mountain... So carry on... You just dont get it do you? The Administration was masterful in trotting Amb Rice out there with the narrative. Absolutely masterful. First, they spike the Benghazi story with the You Tube video lie, and with the help of the media, bury the story and spin it in a way that doesnt negatively impact the election for the President. As a matter of fact, he picked up a bounce from it. Now for the truly masterful part...now that questions are being asked, and the truth finally starts leaking out of the dyke, the Administration can further deflect the attacks by claiming Amb Rice is the victim of racism and sexism by those evil old white guys. For her trouble, she is thrown the State Dept job, and if any questions are asked of that...see the previous defense. Face it, we are being ruled by evil people who lie at will, and an American people so sheepish, they fall for anything. Now wheres my government check at??? excellent post and i agree totally. the administration will only get away with what we the people allow. the media is the enemy in how they spin and report the story. the media is our biggest enemy. :bie: |
| 071676 User ID: 26630358 United States11/28/2012 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Burt Gummer BULLLLLLLLLSHIT! There are only TWO people who had the power to send her out with the Sunday morning show line of POOP. Here's a clue for you...because you have NONE.   I am just taking her word for it,,, her first reaction to a conflicting storyline with the State Dept. You have to admit that the US UN spokesperson is out of the loop when it comes to more powerful positions. CIA Patraues, Obama and or Clinton,,, it swirls around them.. Anyway, your conclusion that Rice should be guilty with the rest is just conjecture. And seems influenced by your politics. The whole scandal seems rather contrived, stemming over press releases and what the Admin and or CIA wanted the public to know,,, a minor screw up. A rather small pebble shadowing a much larger mountain... So carry on... This administration LIES AT EVERY TURN. ...but you are will to take her word for it?  Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? Then What about her statement saying that Colin Powell was wrong to go to the UN and talk about WMDs in Iraq, when that is what was told to him by the same CIA intelligence. If he was wrong in her eyes, then how can she be correct doing the same thing? Sounds like a double standard. |
| davvi User ID: 3677166 United States11/28/2012 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28627006 United States11/28/2012 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why don't you wonder why thos woman who knew nothing made arrangements to go on ALL sunday morning shows? what was the point of this blanket coverage promoting the same lie? Quoting: davvi Same way Sotomyer got in. And yet she was not supposed to rule on 0bamaKare and yet she voted for it, even though that breaks the rules seeing she was an drafter. |
| SFC_Swede User ID: 26708534 United States11/28/2012 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 I am just taking her word for it,,, her first reaction to a conflicting storyline with the State Dept. You have to admit that the US UN spokesperson is out of the loop when it comes to more powerful positions. CIA Patraues, Obama and or Clinton,,, it swirls around them.. Anyway, your conclusion that Rice should be guilty with the rest is just conjecture. And seems influenced by your politics. The whole scandal seems rather contrived, stemming over press releases and what the Admin and or CIA wanted the public to know,,, a minor screw up. A rather small pebble shadowing a much larger mountain... So carry on... This administration LIES AT EVERY TURN. ...but you are will to take her word for it? Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? Then What about her statement saying that Colin Powell was wrong to go to the UN and talk about WMDs in Iraq, when that is what was told to him by the same CIA intelligence. If he was wrong in her eyes, then how can she be correct doing the same thing? Sounds like a double standard. OF COURSE IT IS A DOUBLE STANDARD!!! AGH! This is standard fare for what today is American politics! I wanted to reach through the TV and choke the shit out of little Debbie douchebag when she accused the GOP of racism and being the party of old white men, when it was her specifically, and the DNC in general that moved heaven and earth to defeat Allen West and Mia Love, and put TWO OLD WHITE GUYS in their place! And they get a complete pass....and it pisses me the fuck off! Last Edited by SFC_Swede on 11/28/2012 09:43 AM "Problem solved, Problem staying solved...Rangers lead the Way" Action Figure Therapy "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin |
| SFC_Swede User ID: 26708534 United States11/28/2012 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why don't you wonder why thos woman who knew nothing made arrangements to go on ALL sunday morning shows? what was the point of this blanket coverage promoting the same lie? Quoting: davvi Same way Sotomyer got in. And yet she was not supposed to rule on 0bamaKare and yet she voted for it, even though that breaks the rules seeing she was an drafter. You mean Kagan sir....however she was put in there because she is an activist progressive justice who can be counted on for years to rule against the Constitution, twist it to fit their needs, ect "Problem solved, Problem staying solved...Rangers lead the Way" Action Figure Therapy "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1507542  Canada11/28/2012 10:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27852969 United States11/28/2012 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: davvi why don't you wonder why thos woman who knew nothing made arrangements to go on ALL sunday morning shows? what was the point of this blanket coverage promoting the same lie? . They thought her being a black woman would somehow make her less likely to be questioned. Maybe Team Obama was trying to line her up for political office ... perhaps even a libtard presidential candidate for 2016. Who knows. But they keep saying she was "just reading talking points." Bullshit. Give a chimpanzee enough bananas and you could eventually get her to give false talking points in sign language -- but the talking points would still be a lie nonetheless. . |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28320335  Mexico11/28/2012 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? . Then why the fuck do we even need a Secretary of State then?! Might as well just pay some public relations lackey to read talking points -- because Susan Rice doesn't have the common sense to even question the bullshit she's being handed to read. . First of all, Susan Rice is the Amb to the UN. Her job is to report to that body the position of the US govt. That's her job. IOW yeah, she is a public relations lackey that reads talking points. In this case, given to her by the CIA. And who had eyes and ears on the ground in Benghazi? The CIA had lots of assets there. Did the State Dept? They only had the Ambassador. After he was killed, I guess they were blind, deaf and dumb. So Susan Rice told the UN the truth to the best of her knowledge: that seems entirely probable considering her job description. Since the State Dept didnt have employees or assets in Benghazi, everyone was relying on the CIA to tell them what the fuck happened... So why is everyone asking Susan Rice, a UN Ambassador, what happened? Beats me. You'd think they would be asking Patreaus and Clinton. Yeah? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28320335 Mexico11/28/2012 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 I am just taking her word for it,,, her first reaction to a conflicting storyline with the State Dept. You have to admit that the US UN spokesperson is out of the loop when it comes to more powerful positions. CIA Patraues, Obama and or Clinton,,, it swirls around them.. Anyway, your conclusion that Rice should be guilty with the rest is just conjecture. And seems influenced by your politics. The whole scandal seems rather contrived, stemming over press releases and what the Admin and or CIA wanted the public to know,,, a minor screw up. A rather small pebble shadowing a much larger mountain... So carry on... This administration LIES AT EVERY TURN. ...but you are will to take her word for it? :kookbird: Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? Then What about her statement saying that Colin Powell was wrong to go to the UN and talk about WMDs in Iraq, when that is what was told to him by the same CIA intelligence. If he was wrong in her eyes, then how can she be correct doing the same thing? Sounds like a double standard. Colin Powell was Sec. of State, not an Ambassador. Would that have anything to do with it? Sure they're both black, does that have anything to do with it? |
| SFC_Swede User ID: 26708534 United States11/28/2012 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? . Then why the fuck do we even need a Secretary of State then?! Might as well just pay some public relations lackey to read talking points -- because Susan Rice doesn't have the common sense to even question the bullshit she's being handed to read. . First of all, Susan Rice is the Amb to the UN. Her job is to report to that body the position of the US govt. That's her job. IOW yeah, she is a public relations lackey that reads talking points. In this case, given to her by the CIA. And who had eyes and ears on the ground in Benghazi? The CIA had lots of assets there. Did the State Dept? They only had the Ambassador. After he was killed, I guess they were blind, deaf and dumb. So Susan Rice told the UN the truth to the best of her knowledge: that seems entirely probable considering her job description. Since the State Dept didnt have employees or assets in Benghazi, everyone was relying on the CIA to tell them what the fuck happened... So why is everyone asking Susan Rice, a UN Ambassador, what happened? Beats me. You'd think they would be asking Patreaus and Clinton. Yeah? You are either in complete denial...or just an Obot   "Problem solved, Problem staying solved...Rangers lead the Way" Action Figure Therapy "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28320335 Mexico11/28/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28320335 Sure, why not? She said the CIA passed her their intel, or what to tell to the UN on the subject. So she did. She isnt in a position to know if its true or not,,, I am sure she assumed it to be true. You got a better xplanation? . Then why the fuck do we even need a Secretary of State then?! Might as well just pay some public relations lackey to read talking points -- because Susan Rice doesn't have the common sense to even question the bullshit she's being handed to read. . First of all, Susan Rice is the Amb to the UN. Her job is to report to that body the position of the US govt. That's her job. IOW yeah, she is a public relations lackey that reads talking points. In this case, given to her by the CIA. And who had eyes and ears on the ground in Benghazi? The CIA had lots of assets there. Did the State Dept? They only had the Ambassador. After he was killed, I guess they were blind, deaf and dumb. So Susan Rice told the UN the truth to the best of her knowledge: that seems entirely probable considering her job description. Since the State Dept didnt have employees or assets in Benghazi, everyone was relying on the CIA to tell them what the fuck happened... So why is everyone asking Susan Rice, a UN Ambassador, what happened? Beats me. You'd think they would be asking Patreaus and Clinton. Yeah? You are either in complete denial...or just an Obot It seems logic makes you speechless. Lots of emotons in place of rational thought, but that kind of stuff is for kids. Got anything else to offer? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28320335 Mexico11/28/2012 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously it is the CIA that is the key. Why are GLP member tards covering up for the CIA? I love exposing you guys,,, or rather I like exposing how stupid you are for being dupes for TPTB and their distractions. "Oh look look over here!, Susan Rice 'admits' to something." LMAO!!!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28320335 Mexico11/28/2012 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It doesnt take too much effort... |
| Old MacDonald User ID: 22787734 Canada11/28/2012 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |   In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act - George Orwell Rachel Maddow is HOT!!! - Seriously I'd hit it. A VOTE FOR JUSTIN TRUDEAU IN 2015, WOULD BE THE MOST COWARDLY & IRRESPONSIBLE THING A CANADIAN CITIZEN COULD DO TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE. GUN GRABBERS ARE THE COMMON ENEMY OF ALL PEOPLE. GUN CONTROL HAS RESULTED IN THE SLAUGHTER OF 262 MILLION CITIZENS BY THEIR GOVERNMENTS OVER THE PAST 100 YEARS. THE LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA & THE NDP ENDORSE GUN CONTROL, AN ESSENTIAL POLICY OF HITLER, STALIN, MAO, POL POT, EDI AMIN, QADDAFI, SADDAM, ASSAD, & EVERY OTHER TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT THIS PAST CENTURY. CANADIANS MUST NEVER FORGET THE BETRAYAL OF BILLS C-68 & C-17. WE MUST NOT REST UNTIL THEY ARE FULLY REPEALED. C-19 WAS A GOOD START......BUT JUST A START. GET OFF YOUR COLLECTIVE ASSES AND MAKE AN IMPACT. WE HAVE 26 MONTHS. I, THEE BOB, SWEAR ON THE ALTER OF GOD TO FIGHT ALL FORMS OF CANADIAN TYRANNY AND SAVE MY COUNTRY FROM THE EVILS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER. I WILL NEVER HAND IN MY GUNS. EVER. I AM A FREE MAN, I WILL NOT BE THE BITCH OF THE SOCIALIST ESTABLISHMENT. LEAVE ME ALONE. |
