Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,300 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 485,789
Pageviews Today: 613,881Threads Today: 90Posts Today: 2,138
04:33 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14093935
United States
11/28/2012 06:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
If you happened upon a rock that sort of looks like a human face, you might attribute it to a coincidence of natural erosion...or you might think its a man made object. But the truth would be up to debate if the image was worn and weathered enough.

HOWEVER...

If you came across a perfect statue....or some words and letters perfectly carved out in stone, there would be no question that it's man made.

The reason is that natural processes do not create nor embed subjective asthetical information into matter.

In otherwords, a river is not going to erode a perfect rendition of the mona lisa into a rock face.

WELL heres what I discovered in a nutshell....

You might be familiar with something called metatrons cube...which is a cube that can be drawn in 2d from a geometric image called the "flower of life"

(See here for more info: [link to en.wikipedia.org] )

Now of course, the very fact that this cube is "drawn" on a flat piece of paper suggests that it requires the asthetic and subjective interpretation of the eye of the beholder to "see" it as a cube. No problem.

But that's just a coincidence right? Sort of like seeing a face in a rock that is weathered and eroded...it only looks like a face to us because we apply that asthetic to it.

After all...the idea that mathmatical equation would produce something on a 2d plane that was PURPOSEFULLY intended to be seen and interpeted as a 3d object would suggest that math itself could understand and produce asthetics.

That would be like solving an equation that happens to produce a perfect geometric representation of the mona lisa or draws a picture of a horse in 2d...that you never intended to draw. You just followed the math and it drew itself...

If such a thing WERE to occur...that is, if definative asthetical value were to be created...purposefully...by a math equation...then you could only come to one possible conclusion right? Someone...or something...designed this to happen!

Well that is EXACTLY what I discovered.

I happened upon a mathmatical formula that DREW a complex double helix (DNA) in 2d...

BUT...

By shifting the formula again...it DREW THE SAME DOUBLE HELIX IN 3D on the 2d paper I was working on.

Now think about that!

In order for it to draw a 3d asthetic on a 2d surface, it would have to "Know" that the viewer "meant" to understand it in 3d!

And all the lengths and mathmatical relationships in it verify that this image is fully intended to be understood in 3d!

Random processes do not create asthetical asthetical values!

The only way for this design to occur is if the author of the laws of mathmatics itself designed it to occur this way.

There simply HAS to be intelligence behind it...

therefore...God MUST exist!

angel4
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17767183
Croatia
11/28/2012 06:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
now only if we apply that new knowledge to fear and rever God for what hes done for us...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310273
Estonia
11/28/2012 06:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
whatever
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16362402
Australia
11/28/2012 06:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
now only if we apply that new knowledge to fear and rever God for what hes done for us...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17767183


Yeah..cause if we dont he will BURN US ALIVE forever in UNENDING MERCILESS AGAONY..all in his GREAT LOVE and INTELLIGENCE of course...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3335794
Denmark
11/28/2012 06:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
If you happened upon a rock that sort of looks like a human face, you might attribute it to a coincidence of natural erosion...or you might think its a man made object. But the truth would be up to debate if the image was worn and weathered enough.

HOWEVER...

If you came across a perfect statue....or some words and letters perfectly carved out in stone, there would be no question that it's man made.

The reason is that natural processes do not create nor embed subjective asthetical information into matter.

In otherwords, a river is not going to erode a perfect rendition of the mona lisa into a rock face.

WELL heres what I discovered in a nutshell....

You might be familiar with something called metatrons cube...which is a cube that can be drawn in 2d from a geometric image called the "flower of life"

(See here for more info: [link to en.wikipedia.org] )

Now of course, the very fact that this cube is "drawn" on a flat piece of paper suggests that it requires the asthetic and subjective interpretation of the eye of the beholder to "see" it as a cube. No problem.

But that's just a coincidence right? Sort of like seeing a face in a rock that is weathered and eroded...it only looks like a face to us because we apply that asthetic to it.

After all...the idea that mathmatical equation would produce something on a 2d plane that was PURPOSEFULLY intended to be seen and interpeted as a 3d object would suggest that math itself could understand and produce asthetics.

That would be like solving an equation that happens to produce a perfect geometric representation of the mona lisa or draws a picture of a horse in 2d...that you never intended to draw. You just followed the math and it drew itself...

If such a thing WERE to occur...that is, if definative asthetical value were to be created...purposefully...by a math equation...then you could only come to one possible conclusion right? Someone...or something...designed this to happen!

Well that is EXACTLY what I discovered.

I happened upon a mathmatical formula that DREW a complex double helix (DNA) in 2d...

BUT...

By shifting the formula again...it DREW THE SAME DOUBLE HELIX IN 3D on the 2d paper I was working on.

Now think about that!

In order for it to draw a 3d asthetic on a 2d surface, it would have to "Know" that the viewer "meant" to understand it in 3d!

And all the lengths and mathmatical relationships in it verify that this image is fully intended to be understood in 3d!

Random processes do not create asthetical asthetical values!

The only way for this design to occur is if the author of the laws of mathmatics itself designed it to occur this way.

There simply HAS to be intelligence behind it...

therefore...God MUST exist!

angel4
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14093935


You need to go back and learn basic mathematics again.
2+2 does not equal 5.

Once you've mastered basic arithmetic, take a look at Fibonacci numbers and move on from there.
Maths=Physics in purely equation form.
Maths≠god
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14093935
United States
11/28/2012 06:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
angel4
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14093935


You need to go back and learn basic mathematics again.
2+2 does not equal 5.

Once you've mastered basic arithmetic, take a look at Fibonacci numbers and move on from there.
Maths=Physics in purely equation form.
Maths≠god
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3335794


Well aware of the Fibonacci numbers. Other than that, your statement makes no rational applicable argument to anything I wrote.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14093935
United States
11/28/2012 06:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3335794
Denmark
11/28/2012 06:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
angel4
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14093935


You need to go back and learn basic mathematics again.
2+2 does not equal 5.

Once you've mastered basic arithmetic, take a look at Fibonacci numbers and move on from there.
Maths=Physics in purely equation form.
Maths≠god
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3335794


Well aware of the Fibonacci numbers. Other than that, your statement makes no rational applicable argument to anything I wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14093935


That's because your original statement makes no rational argument.
I fight fuckwittery with fuckwittery.
2012Portal
2012Portal - The Mayan Calendar

User ID: 15022013
Netherlands
11/28/2012 07:04 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
God is great!

Explain this "man praying" on the side of a cliff on a mountain of a Cathar castle...


Chateau de Peyrepertuse - The Cathars in France:
[link to www.daviddilling.com]


The eye is in the beholder!
Mayan Calendar and 2012-
From the love of power to the power of Love -
[link to 2012portal.myfeedportal.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3335794
Denmark
11/28/2012 07:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
God is great!

Explain this "man praying" on the side of a cliff on a mountain of a Cathar castle...


Chateau de Peyrepertuse - The Cathars in France:
[link to www.daviddilling.com]


The eye is in the beholder!
 Quoting: 2012Portal


It's a fucking rock that has succumbed to erosion.

If you believe otherwise then you should be allowed near sharp objects.
2012Portal
2012Portal - The Mayan Calendar

User ID: 15022013
Netherlands
11/28/2012 07:21 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I discovered scientific evidence for the existence of God!!!!!
God is great!

Explain this "man praying" on the side of a cliff on a mountain of a Cathar castle...


Chateau de Peyrepertuse - The Cathars in France:
[link to www.daviddilling.com]


The eye is in the beholder!
 Quoting: 2012Portal


It's a fucking rock that has succumbed to erosion.

If you believe otherwise then you should be allowed near sharp objects.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3335794


I clicked through and "I" see it.
Naturally it is a rock.
Of course it went through erosion.
And now it looks like an old man, kneeling down, hands clasped, in prayer.

Add in the historical location and I see it even clearer.

Last Edited by 2012Portal on 11/28/2012 07:21 AM
Mayan Calendar and 2012-
From the love of power to the power of Love -
[link to 2012portal.myfeedportal.com]

News