NEED TO WRITE A THESIS ON ENERGY CRISIS HELP!

What is energy?

That's a good title.

Intro:

Energy is all around us.

Thesis:

We need energy reform

1 Minerals / Exploration
2 Spiritual / String Theory / Physics
3 Alloy / Bonds / Finance and the Economy

Conclusion:
We need energy reform because it is being controlled
by a network of entities who literally control
all nations via their current in energy's
that stem from various sources such as currency, commodities
and other hedged products that create war's that
are funded and majorly share owned by the taxed.

I love that, but now.... where should I pull the information from? to cite?

Also index some transportation.

Oil will spike and never come down.
Financial control in 2017.
Dow Jones average 13.5 2017
Individual energy in relation to purpose or goals
and portfolio gains which are non existent or contracting
for a majority of the population. So they're
forced to borrow energy until they can
read a new script or dance to a new song
for another, brutal conducter

Instead of fossil fuels look at the alternatives. Plenty of off the grid people are almost 100% solar now. Plugin hybrids can get you most of where you need to go without using any oil at all.

If you count the cost of endless middle east war, solar and plugin hybrids are far far cheaper than oil dependence. What little remaining oil is needed near term can be sourced domestically.

You rock... my brain is bombarded by teacher so its hard to write right now.

You need to read the book rigged it explains about when the Dubai commodity exchange was set up and how it led to speculators driving the price of oil up.


Rigged
[link to www.amazon.com]

Canadian Mortgage Housing Corporation
CME Group
NASDAQ
NYSE
Any .gov website really.

True, because this thesis is either FOR or OPPOSE the issue.


Maybe I should be FOR the alternative use, which in reality, is alot easier to state than opposing TPTB

THAKN YOU GUYS... !!!!!!!!!!

That's right. We need alternative energy futures. Wall Street isn't evil. It's the regulators that are evil. Politicians and their financiers and their morals. The energy, the incentive that out hedges a long-term appreciative gain in relation to moral energy, and the right energy for the long-term gains. CBOE Options Exchange is in disrepair. It is non-existent. It was the most physical, and exciting paradigm in American 21st century liberalism, and a lesson to
anybody who hasn't felt energy. It inspires energy,
within energy.

To trade energy. Un-regulated. To be the creator and
destroyer of your distributed and imported
energy, for the long-term or short-term, is only
the importer's choice. No politician, should
have any regulation on trade within futures exchanges.
Wall Street and Politics do not mix, unless
the regulation is to de-regulate the energy.

That's right. We need alternative energy futures. Wall Street isn't evil. It's the regulators that are evil. Politicians and their financiers and their morals. The energy, the incentive that out hedges a long-term appreciative gain in relation to moral energy, and the right energy for the long-term gains. CBOE Options Exchange is in disrepair. It is non-existent. It was the most physical, and exciting paradigm in American 21st century liberalism, and a lesson to
anybody who hasn't felt energy. It inspires energy,
within energy.

To trade energy. Un-regulated. To be the creator and
destroyer of your distributed and imported
energy, for the long-term or short-term, is only
the importer's choice. No politician, should
have any regulation on trade within futures exchanges.
Wall Street and Politics do not mix, unless
the regulation is to de-regulate the energy

I don't want to spam your thread. But,

There's so many people out there; who aren't on
disability, yet they deserve it the most.

Crisis.

Hedge fund managers, who pride themselves on their
mathematical prowess in relation to directional
betting even a 20 year old could manage with
basic algebra.

Crisis.

It is a crisis, that as an autonomic economy, the sympathetic
functions such as our actions cannot be controlled nor
rationalized, so that our parasympathetic functions
such as our GDP or our unemployment rate, continues
to increase and decrease respectively, in relation
to our revenue vs debt to equity ratio.

Crisis.

It is lastly, a crisis, because as the government's
of all nations continue to increase their social
awareness campaign in relation to economics or
medical crisis' like forms of cancer, the
gov't becomes a crisis in itself, and becomes
the cancer of the autonomic body. Because, so long as
the gov't continues to subdsidize majority
share owned corporations in relation to liquidity
providers like the major banks of JPM, Suisse,
or CIBC with bail-out funds derived from
credit-default swaps, hedged with bond
purchases, the tax-payer will continue to hold
a majority share in it's Crisis.

And not only is it a crisis. It is a term, largely
used to fear monger. A crisis is when a house burns
down. So if this economy has burnt to the ground,
then I think the biggest question of all is:

Who is leveraged? And who isn't? Who is providing
the leverage? What is leveraged today? Tommorow? Who
is holding the bag? The bag that contains
a black hole. The end of time. Who is
holding all of the responsibility
of every leveraged share holder? Gov't's? Is
the UN and the IMF and the World bank, literally
passing a hot economic potato around
which contains leveraged bond, subprime index
consumer and mortgage loans? Dated from 1920? Dated
from when security loans were issued, and leveraged
with a bond that was switched from defaulters
to a liquid institution?

"We had to crash. We consumed too much" They say.

No.

We didn't consume enough. Because there was no more
to consume after 1929.

Re title

The END of Liberalism
The END of Capitalism
The END of Mysticism
The END of Exchange
The END of Energy
WHERE IS THE CRISIS

The only solution to ending a contracting
security index, aggregate of every other statistic
in existence historically via global indicies,

Is to release the futures. Because we are the futures.

Wall and Water St. Tear down that wall. So that
we may become liquid again. And flow like the river
through monetary time

OP, start by asking the obvious question "Are we in an energy crisis?"

To answer that we would have to define what makes "energy a crisis," most likely

1. Shortage
2. Pollution

Determine the sources of energy in order of use (research the percentage used world wide). I would guess,

1. Petroleum
2. Hydroelectric
3. Coal
4. Natural Gas
5. Nuclear
6. Wind
7. Solar
8. Other

These variety of energy sources would suggest there are abundant sources so shortage does not seem to be the problem. If you want to go deeper into shortage then you can research the cost of each source under the economics of supply and demand, which will illustrate either the abundance or scarcity of a commodity. But, I think you will find the economic model will not fit perfectly, because in energy, cost rising with the demand does not necessarily reflect the natural availability or scarcity of energy, hence any shortage problem in energy is likely due to an inefficent economy (i.e. monopoly, corruption, price fixing, logistics supply, labor shortage etc)

So this will leave you to consider the second possible crisis, pollution. You can research the percentage of pollution and environmental impacts for each identified energy source (CO2 emissions, oil spills, nuclear waste accidents, etc), and then propose a solution either as economic or technology (maybe a bit both). But, I think the answer will lay mostly in technology.

Here is where the fun part begins. Research Testla and Zero Point Energy. Look up Youtube Videos of energy demonstrations by inventors that might have an answer and present your investigation in your research.

Conclude with a summary, which (energy) crisis is it really (shortage or pollution), and how it might be fixed.

There's your outline. Oh, and ALWAYS CITE YOUR SOURCES. The quickest way to fail a paper (other than not turning one in) is plagerism.

Good luck!

Last Edited by Nexus-9 on 11/28/2012 01:39 PM

Check amazon for: The Energy Non Crisis

This is excellent, now I can take from all sources...with others, and break it down.

I LOVE GLP!

Okay, So i've been told it is a pursuasive thesis...

so.

Wish me luck. I am going to take each example you all gave and combine. :)

[link to www.stumbleupon.com]

Thanks CE1

This is my introductory paragraph, I am having a HARD time coming up with how to pursuade someone on paper.

Anyway, please give me your advice..

Or the scale if im in the ball park

"Energy is all around us, we use it for entirely everything. I am going to present the ways in which energy of all form, shape our reality. To reduce corruption and destruction of our modern ways, we must be aware the how-to of manifesting energ in a clean, efficient manner".

These 2 things go hand in hand, and should be the basis of your thesis.

First, examine this video and see how 1 particle of light acts:

[link to www.youtube.com]




Next, consider this:

Genesis: 3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

---

This will make sense once you see how 1 particle of light acts when shot out a barrel, like in the video link I provided. Now imagine God saying Let there be Light... and how this could have happened... awesome!!

..But the Energy Non Crisis is also a good place to start...lol.

FYI.....

One could easily argue.....WHAT ENERGY CRISIS?

That statement I highlighted is a loaded biased statement assuming there is crisis to begin with.

Do not go into as much detail about the crisis as you do about proposed, and approved solutions.

Teachers love that shit, and you get extra marks for correctly quoting, and referencing the experts.

Heck, where were you guys when I was in college?

"excuse my diction, but lets gets down to some FRICTION!"

Again I point out....what CRISIS???

One has to prove that even exists (which it does not) before one could go on to proving / discussing any other points.

Instead of picking an individual energy, can you write an overview thesis on the energy crisis, the rush by countries for control of the last remaining energy resources, and the desperate search by scientists to find effective, cheap and safe energy alternatives, if you wanted to.

Or,
Nuclear, for example, is the safest and cheapest way to produce electricity, however their are catastrophic risks, you can then go into the increased danger of ageing reactors, and countries reluctance to pay the money to replace them. Then you can use the example of Fukushima. Some points to highlight, Japans initial reluctance to change to Nuclear power, being convinced (bullied) by the Nuclear Energy, who's expert decided to build it in an active earthquake and Tsunami zone, all these bad decisions have led to the devastation that is the Worlds worse nuclear disaster.

Then you will go into, how this disaster and disasters like it are factored and engineered into all new reactors. But is it too late for Japan? (teachers love that shit).

Now the conclusion and ode to the future, as nuclear power is the safest, cheapest and cleanest energy source, and despite the scale of the devastation now befallen Japan, it's inevitable that TPTB find the risk is outweighed by the benefit of Nuclear Energy. But future reactors will be engineered to withstand the disasters that crippled other countries.


The end. Now delete this thread so your teacher doesn't search on line and fail you for plagiarism.

Once again that is a GROSS UPROVEN ASSUMPTION.
WHAT energy crisis?


God you people suck at arguments and writing skills.

WTF, you've already picked on me. Your troll skills are a bit rusty?

Either way, if it exists or not...

The big money maker greed losers are controlling my day to day life. I have a desire to embrace what I remember, and to live beyond them. BUT HOW can I start when they are HOLDING me down with their limitations so they can regulate their productions...

I can't stand it lol.

SO, I decided...and asked the professor if a paper over energy/ energy crisis / energy ANYTHING be ok? They said YES.

OF course, because it is my persuasion to pull a reader who may be blind, to light..
OVER THIS FALSE use of ENERGY.

It's not a matter of "picking on you"...it's a matter of writing an INTELLIGENT thesis.

You cannot base a thesis on UNPROVEN ASSUMPTIONS dingleheimer.

Get it???




Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 12/03/2012 07:35 PM

You better have some good evidence and approved resources to back up your claim, or you're staring at a big fat F.