Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,839 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 378,034
Pageviews Today: 646,449Threads Today: 314Posts Today: 4,353
07:38 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc...
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version,

“there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.”

There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife?

[link to www.ensignmessage.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27211004


First and foremost, all you people need to figure out what happen to Noah's sons and their offspring and you will have your answers. The 12 tribes existed in Egypt for over 400 years and it is accounted for historically. Joseph even took wives of Egypt. But if people think that they were black, then they are highly mistaken. Nothing wrong with being black cause black is beautiful, but to say that Hebrews were black is actually historically inaccurate. It is also a means to rob white folks of their ancestry. Look at Israel today... all of Israel, not black people folks. Do the math. Don't perpetuate lies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135


read the article bub.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27211004


Already did. Take a look at the genealogy of Moses and then Aaron. Bub. Which one ended and which one continued? I'll give you a hint. Aaron's bloodline continued in the priesthood. You don't hear too much about children of Moses do you? Hmmmmmm..... Doesn't really matter anyways because by the time the Hebrews were in the wilderness, there were hundreds of thousands of them.

I've done my homework, folks. Nothing you can say or links you can post can refute historical extra-biblical record.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135


the bible has been mangled. then too the bible is a shadow of earlier knowlege.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP