Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,097 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,087,731
Pageviews Today: 2,758,517Threads Today: 610Posts Today: 12,495
08:48 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject How do you deal with the general public when it comes to conspiracies?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


It was much more than just a suggestion--especially when the Joint Chiefs of Staff, aka the top senior uniformed leaders in the United States Department of Defense, puts a signature on a 10 page plus, fleshed out document to give the green light to carry an operation out in various scenarios.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3738979


You didnt bother to read about Mongoose did you? they signed off everything back then.
 Quoting: SheldonCooper


You're missing the point. The point is that the gov. considered terrorism against it's own people. It was one of the 30 plus operations that went directly to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara for approval. It wasn't just a suggestion. Operation Northwoods was fleshed out with a lot of thought put into it, signed and once again as I said, was sent to the Secretary of Defense for approval. If President John F. Kennedy gave the plots in that document the green light, it would of went ahead. That's how close those scenarios came to happening. The President rejected it. That's the only reason that the operation didn't go through.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3738979


You are the one missing the point. People were asked to come up with 'out of the box' ideas. Too many were submitted including exploding cigars, dolphins with bombs etc. so most were signed off without even being read. It was 1 persons idea, not the government. I doubt you have even read Northwoods itself, how many people did it suggest killing?
 Quoting: SheldonCooper


Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. I can't fathom why you don't condemn such "suggestions" as you put them, nor why those involved didn't either. If you were to write out a similar document to take out the President or some sort of gov. official, you don't think that they wouldn't be locked up for it? I mean, your document is only a riddled with suggestions and all.... see how well that would work for your defense.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News