Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,416 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,510,399
Pageviews Today: 3,407,231Threads Today: 727Posts Today: 14,165
11:24 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The earth is NOT 6000 years old.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28765560
United States
11/30/2012 04:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
You guys do realize that the 'bible' is just a rewriting of all of the holy books that came before it, right? Why would anyone look for truth in a book that is not even original in its ideas? Perhaps you should check out the books that inspired it, or wait, you wouldn't read that either?
I love how you guys just turn a cheek to anything that might change your mind. If the truth stared you in the face, I have a feeling you'd just tturn away and act like children. Well, there's the truth, the earth is older than what you'd like.. so what? It doesn't disprove the bible, there are a million other things that do that just fine. Would you like some examples?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11022368


Well said, lord of the flies.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28765560
United States
11/30/2012 04:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
I am an educated Christian. Most of my friends are educated Christians. I have yet to meet a well informed intelligent educated Christian who believes the earth is young.
 Quoting: revcc


You've had the truth "educated" right out of you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28721290
Germany
11/30/2012 04:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
You think the Grand Canyon was formed by a Flood? Okay, whatever. I have another question for young earth theorists. What creates impact craters?

There are impact craters that are over 100 Kilometers wide. Any impact that would create such a crater would be many hundreds of megatons of TNT in destructive power. It would wipe out all life on earth, and leave it uninhabitable for at least centuries, most likely more.

And it's not the only one. There are dozens of impact craters all over the earth, and the MOON! It has hundreds! But we barely ever see anything hit it bigger then a grapefruit. It'd be hard to acquire all those craters in a scant 6000 years.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9266723


God dug those pesky craters, and then covered them with grass just to test his sheeps faith.

Then another one of the quadrillions of planets in the universe harboring life needed his attention. That's why our moon isn't green! ;-)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11705783
United States
11/30/2012 04:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
What creates impact craters?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9266723

[link to www.creationscience.com]

[link to truthmatters.info]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9266723
United States
11/30/2012 05:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
What creates impact craters?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9266723

[link to www.creationscience.com]

[link to truthmatters.info]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11705783


If I'm reading this right, these are claiming that they're caused by gushers of water so powerful they launched huge rocks and water into space? almost 3,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Kilograms of it? Where did all that energy come from?

And it still dosen't explain the craters that are on earth from impacts that would have wiped out all life.
Judethz
Israel is Eternal

User ID: 20521597
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 05:17 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
Do the Christians of this forum have an opinion on this?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22256187


9teen This questions been answered dozens of times. This is from a thread I did in 2008.

The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.

It's a sad thing that many Christians have an appalling lack of biblical understanding, that at times enables our enemies to run rings around us. To take one example: You often see or read of mockers in the media saying words to the effect that: "The bible is inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old."

But the bible also says...2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

You can easily work out for yourself that if you multiply 360 days (lunar years) x 6,000 x 1,000 that you get a figure of well over 2 billion years. Which also leaves plenty of room for quite a few 1,000 year periods to pass as single days.

No doubt some carping evolutionist will start whingeing that "the bible is still inaccurate because the earth is 6 billion (or whatever) years old. And I've got two good answers to that one.

Firstly: Just because you have blind faith in (a) the inherent accuracy of their scientific instruments. (b) The true scientific integrity of those doing the laboratory work. (c) That they cannot be fooled by false readings and/or assumptions. Pleeeeeeeeze do not expect me to take your shaky assumptions at face value. I know for a fact that false science is being used to bamboozle everyone into believing what they say about 'global warming', so why should I give you the benefit of the doubt.

Secondly: Try and explain this one away. We are told in the story of creation that the earth was formed from the small stuff that was left over after the creation of the universe. Therefore it should be quite reasonable to expect that for instance one group of about 500 million cubic miles of rock that outcrops on the earth's surface is perhaps 6 billion or so years old. Another outcrop of perhaps 200 million cubic miles could be 3 or 4 billion years old. And so on.

To sum up. If the material that was used to make the earth was in existence before the earth was formed, then obviously it is older than the earth.

So if in the future you hear some idiot spouting off about "the bible being inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old," you can correct them.

Thread: The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.

Last Edited by Judethz on 11/30/2012 05:18 AM
...333...
User ID: 24170033
Netherlands
11/30/2012 05:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
well my view:

God made the universe long before he made man

The bible clearly says, if read between the lines:

that god changed earth 6000 years ago so it could be prosperous, it WAS a wasteland, so yea i believe earth is older then 6000 years, but the way it is now, tress and such you get the picture i hope


to many misconceptions about god in general, the body isn't the temple, the soul is ( how you stand in life)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17687147
United States
11/30/2012 05:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
im slipping here a secret, im high degree mason, and i can tell you that earth is 6000 years old, but what nobody know is human histoy is much shorter, its only 900 years old
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1475421


tell them the truth! perhaps 900 years on this rock but even that can be proven wrong so why the disinformation?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17687147
United States
11/30/2012 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
You guys do realize that the 'bible' is just a rewriting of all of the holy books that came before it, right? Why would anyone look for truth in a book that is not even original in its ideas? Perhaps you should check out the books that inspired it, or wait, you wouldn't read that either?
I love how you guys just turn a cheek to anything that might change your mind. If the truth stared you in the face, I have a feeling you'd just tturn away and act like children. Well, there's the truth, the earth is older than what you'd like.. so what? It doesn't disprove the bible, there are a million other things that do that just fine. Would you like some examples?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11022368


Well said, lord of the flies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28765560


or did they borrow the books from them.A lot was going on back then
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1473574
United States
11/30/2012 05:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
no shit
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24068631
United States
11/30/2012 05:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
I am with those who believe this age of the earth or civilization of time now is 6,000 years old but the earth itself is way older.

<< Jeremiah 4 >>
New International Version 1984

23I looked at the earth,

and it was formless and empty;

and at the heavens,

and their light was gone.

24I looked at the mountains,

and they were quaking;

all the hills were swaying.

25I looked, and there were no people;

every bird in the sky had flown away.

26I looked, and the fruitful land was a desert;

all its towns lay in ruins

before the Lord, before his fierce anger.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28198895
Canada
11/30/2012 06:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
The Chinese have been growing marijuana for hemp clothes for over 12,000 years.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2045712
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 06:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
Do the Christians of this forum have an opinion on this?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22256187


:9teen: This questions been answered dozens of times. This is from a thread I did in 2008.

The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.

It's a sad thing that many Christians have an appalling lack of biblical understanding, that at times enables our enemies to run rings around us. To take one example: You often see or read of mockers in the media saying words to the effect that: "The bible is inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old."

But the bible also says...2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

You can easily work out for yourself that if you multiply 360 days (lunar years) x 6,000 x 1,000 that you get a figure of well over 2 billion years. Which also leaves plenty of room for quite a few 1,000 year periods to pass as single days.

No doubt some carping evolutionist will start whingeing that "the bible is still inaccurate because the earth is 6 billion (or whatever) years old. And I've got two good answers to that one.

Firstly: Just because you have blind faith in (a) the inherent accuracy of their scientific instruments. (b) The true scientific integrity of those doing the laboratory work. (c) That they cannot be fooled by false readings and/or assumptions. Pleeeeeeeeze do not expect me to take your shaky assumptions at face value. I know for a fact that false science is being used to bamboozle everyone into believing what they say about 'global warming', so why should I give you the benefit of the doubt.

Secondly: Try and explain this one away. We are told in the story of creation that the earth was formed from the small stuff that was left over after the creation of the universe. Therefore it should be quite reasonable to expect that for instance one group of about 500 million cubic miles of rock that outcrops on the earth's surface is perhaps 6 billion or so years old. Another outcrop of perhaps 200 million cubic miles could be 3 or 4 billion years old. And so on.

To sum up. If the material that was used to make the earth was in existence before the earth was formed, then obviously it is older than the earth.

So if in the future you hear some idiot spouting off about "the bible being inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old," you can correct them.

Thread: The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.
 Quoting: Judethz


I didn't think we had creationists on this side of the pond.
I always thought it was mainly north Americans.
You should feel ashamed of yourself for believing such bilge in this day and age.
Jerichofall

User ID: 16493366
11/30/2012 06:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
The age of the earth is one thing, and I like Kent Hovind's research a lot. Irrespective, no one can call the big bang 'theory' science, and no one can call macro-evolution (one species evolving in to a completely new species)science either. They are theories, because no one has even witnessed or recorded matter appearing out of nothing, and non one has witnessed or recorded a species evolve in to a brand new species - it doesn't happen. Scientists can claim it takes millions and billions of years to happen, but it's conjecture, it's theoretical. Where did all the matter for this earth come from??

“A little science estranges men from God, but much science leads them back to him.” – Louis Pasteur

“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.’ – Albert Einstein

“To suppose that the eye, with all of its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.” – Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

“Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable mico-miniaturised factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world.” Molecular Biologist Michael Denton

“There is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on earth…So why do biologists indulge in unsubstantiated fantasies in order to deny what is so patently obvious, that the 200,000 amino acid chains, and hence life, did not appear by chance?” Frederick Hoyle

“An increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists… argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all.. Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.” Michael Ruse, New Scientist (article)

“…according to the law of inertia the rotation of the planets spinning off from the big bang should be conserved, spinning the same direction. At the very least, the moons of planets should be orbiting in the same direction. This, however, is not the case. The best answer provided to support this absurdity of logic and scientific reason is that certain scientists have claimed that they are allowed to exercise sovereignty over the laws of science when they deem appropriate. I am not making this up.” – Jason W Pratt, aero-space engineer (and former atheist).

We may share 96% our genetic makeup with a chimpanzee… However, the 4% difference of the 3 billion base pairs of DNA in every cell, represents 120,000,000 entries in the DNA code that are different. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while chimps have 24 so the DNA isn’t as similar as you may have been lead to believe. We also share about 50% of our DNA with bananas and that doesn’t make us half bananas. – Steven Jones, Geneticist
Matt 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Psalm 119:165 Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.

Amos 8:11  Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD:

Ruth 1:1 Now it came to pass in the days when the judges ruled, that there was a famine in the land.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28767252
Ireland
11/30/2012 06:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
Yes it is. Too many anomalies in the billions of years old rubbish theories
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28765529
Canada
11/30/2012 06:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
I am an educated Christian. Most of my friends are educated Christians. I have yet to meet a well informed intelligent educated Christian who believes the earth is young.
 Quoting: revcc


Is it a matter of being well informed, or what sect they belong to?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24292028
Bahamas
11/30/2012 06:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
The earth is 6000 years old
and it is also flat and is the center of our solar system.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2045712
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 06:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
I am with those who believe this age of the earth or civilization of time now is 6,000 years old but the earth itself is way older.

<< Jeremiah 4 >>
New International Version 1984

23I looked at the earth,

and it was formless and empty;

and at the heavens,

and their light was gone.

24I looked at the mountains,

and they were quaking;

all the hills were swaying.

25I looked, and there were no people;

every bird in the sky had flown away.

26I looked, and the fruitful land was a desert;

all its towns lay in ruins

before the Lord, before his fierce anger.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24068631


The first civilizations (certainly in the way we describe them now) are over twice as old as your 6000 years.
But it all depends what actually is classed as a civilisation, cro-Magnon cave paintings are 32000 years old. The famous Venus of Willendorf statuette is around 25000 years old and there are plenty of other examples to show proto-civilized behaviour.
Systematic and reproducible agriculture began over 10000 years ago which again is well before your 6000 years.
I realise I'm showing this to blind eyes and unreceptive brains but this could be since neanderthal man didn't actually die out as we thought and creationists are direct descendants.
Maybe in fact you genuinely are a new sub-species (Darwin's "Missing-Link"?) and we should classify you as follows;
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis-creationidioticus.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2045712
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 06:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
The age of the earth is one thing, and I like Kent Hovind's research a lot. Irrespective, no one can call the big bang 'theory' science, and no one can call macro-evolution (one species evolving in to a completely new species)science either. They are theories, because no one has even witnessed or recorded matter appearing out of nothing, and non one has witnessed or recorded a species evolve in to a brand new species - it doesn't happen. Scientists can claim it takes millions and billions of years to happen, but it's conjecture, it's theoretical. Where did all the matter for this earth come from??

“A little science estranges men from God, but much science leads them back to him.” – Louis Pasteur

“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.’ – Albert Einstein

“To suppose that the eye, with all of its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.” – Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

“Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable mico-miniaturised factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world.” Molecular Biologist Michael Denton

“There is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on earth…So why do biologists indulge in unsubstantiated fantasies in order to deny what is so patently obvious, that the 200,000 amino acid chains, and hence life, did not appear by chance?” Frederick Hoyle

“An increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists… argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all.. Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.” Michael Ruse, New Scientist (article)

“…according to the law of inertia the rotation of the planets spinning off from the big bang should be conserved, spinning the same direction. At the very least, the moons of planets should be orbiting in the same direction. This, however, is not the case. The best answer provided to support this absurdity of logic and scientific reason is that certain scientists have claimed that they are allowed to exercise sovereignty over the laws of science when they deem appropriate. I am not making this up.” – Jason W Pratt, aero-space engineer (and former atheist).

We may share 96% our genetic makeup with a chimpanzee… However, the 4% difference of the 3 billion base pairs of DNA in every cell, represents 120,000,000 entries in the DNA code that are different. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while chimps have 24 so the DNA isn’t as similar as you may have been lead to believe. We also share about 50% of our DNA with bananas and that doesn’t make us half bananas. – Steven Jones, Geneticist
 Quoting: Jerichofall


You don't understand the proper definition of the word "theory" do you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22699475
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 07:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
ye, it's prob older than 6000 years. Unless this tree came from space:

[link to news.nationalgeographic.co.uk]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28765529
Canada
11/30/2012 07:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
ye, it's prob older than 6000 years. Unless this tree came from space:

[link to news.nationalgeographic.co.uk]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22699475


Yes, but you are just relying on people telling you that tree is a certain age. You have no way of directly proving it is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2045712
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 07:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
ye, it's prob older than 6000 years. Unless this tree came from space:

[link to news.nationalgeographic.co.uk]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22699475


Yes, but you are just relying on people telling you that tree is a certain age. You have no way of directly proving it is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28765529


The irony in your post is quite frightening.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1475421
Norway
11/30/2012 07:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
im slipping here a secret, im high degree mason, and i can tell you that earth is 6000 years old, but what nobody know is human histoy is much shorter, its only 900 years old
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1475421


tell them the truth! perhaps 900 years on this rock but even that can be proven wrong so why the disinformation?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17687147


it began with templars not before or after, they became what the jesuits we know today, they worte all human history. You should look up Anatoly Fomenko
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3584790
France
11/30/2012 07:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
Can't we just consider that one day of the Lord is not equal to one of our human days ? After all space and time are relative thus 6 days of the creator might refer to billions of years.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28765529
Canada
11/30/2012 07:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
ye, it's prob older than 6000 years. Unless this tree came from space:

[link to news.nationalgeographic.co.uk]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22699475


Yes, but you are just relying on people telling you that tree is a certain age. You have no way of directly proving it is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28765529


The irony in your post is quite frightening.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2045712


How so?
Horus of the Two Horizons
User ID: 22454667
United States
11/30/2012 07:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
This Earth, the arrangement on land and sea we know today, was created by a pole shift approximately 6,000 years ago.

The whole planet, down to the core, has existed for billions of years, but not with the current surface arrangement - that changes often. This roughly 5 billion year old sphere is not what ancients meant when they referred to the earth, they meant the current surface arrangement.

I'm in expert in certain fields and have put together a book comparing Bible prophecy to a few other sources of information... and I think the seven year tribulation begins with the end of the Mayan Long Count December 21, 2012 - with Judgment Day in December 2019.

If you care to learn more answers to odd Bible mysteries or prophecies, check my web site

[link to endtimesand2019.webs.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22699475
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 07:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
This Earth, the arrangement on land and sea we know today, was created by a pole shift approximately 6,000 years ago.

The whole planet, down to the core, has existed for billions of years, but not with the current surface arrangement - that changes often. This roughly 5 billion year old sphere is not what ancients meant when they referred to the earth, they meant the current surface arrangement.

I'm in expert in certain fields and have put together a book comparing Bible prophecy to a few other sources of information... and I think the seven year tribulation begins with the end of the Mayan Long Count December 21, 2012 - with Judgment Day in December 2019.

If you care to learn more answers to odd Bible mysteries or prophecies, check my web site

[link to endtimesand2019.webs.com]
 Quoting: Horus of the Two Horizons 22454667


Graham Hanckock?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2045712
United Kingdom
11/30/2012 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
This Earth, the arrangement on land and sea we know today, was created by a pole shift approximately 6,000 years ago.

The whole planet, down to the core, has existed for billions of years, but not with the current surface arrangement - that changes often. This roughly 5 billion year old sphere is not what ancients meant when they referred to the earth, they meant the current surface arrangement.

I'm in expert in certain fields and have put together a book comparing Bible prophecy to a few other sources of information... and I think the seven year tribulation begins with the end of the Mayan Long Count December 21, 2012 - with Judgment Day in December 2019.

If you care to learn more answers to odd Bible mysteries or prophecies, check my web site

[link to endtimesand2019.webs.com]
 Quoting: Horus of the Two Horizons 22454667


You're obviously not.
Well, outside of your own mind anyway.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20078449
United States
11/30/2012 08:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
The Bible does not teach that the earth is only ~6,000 years old. In fact, it teaches the opposite.

What the Bible does indicate and record is that Adam and Eve were created approximately 6,000 years ago. (ie, Adam and Eve are the ancestors of the white race)

Prior to the creation of Adam and Eve, going back perhaps thousands and millions of years, life existed in previous ages on the Earth. At some point, as indicated by the Bible, this life was destroyed in a great cataclysm, including flooding by water. Genesis 1:2 records that the Creator "moved upon the face of the waters" of this desolated Earth, and then "remade" the Earth and re-created life on the Earth.

This all can be shown from a proper translation of Genesis and other passages in the Bible from the original Hebrew and Greek.

Here's a good resource/link on this:
[link to www.biblestudysite.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5164756
United States
11/30/2012 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The earth is NOT 6000 years old.
I love how the base of proof for creationist science comes from
A. Other non scientific type creationists.
B. Youtube video created by non science type creationists.
C. A book, clearly compose
d for its stories and not historical fact.

Modern science must be a Marxist, atheist agenda!
It just has to be the work of the devil, because it goes against what my favorite YouTube videos are telling me. Creationists think to themselves, if all modern science is correct, that would make what my favorite book says 100% false and that just can't be. I refuse to believe that everyone is correct, that every scientist is correct.. I want to be different, and so I found a theory, made by religious extreemists, and I became part of that cult, and no we are an oppressed group :'(.. look guys, I get it, you hate women, you hate science, you hate people who don't believe what you do. But I'm an atheist, and I love you guys, I don't want to convert you, I want to let you go on after death, and find there is no heaven. That's fine.
Try to watch some other YouTube videos in your spare time. ;)
Living dinosaurs, do not disprove evolution. It just means the theory is evolving Which is what is so great about science! Nobody is setting these ideas is stone, and forcing it down your throat. We are saying, this is the most complete model we have at the moment, that best describes the way the universe works to the best of our knowledge. To look at just ONE holy book from the long history of religion, and claim that it must contain all knowledge, and all answers, merely because it claims to. The fact that the bible, Along with zero historians, who wrote plenty of things at the same time the bible was being written make no mention of the date of the earth. The bible does not mention the date of the earth. It does however mention accounts (that don't even agree on each other) of human acts that had never taken place, you know, the same allegorical stories contained in the holy books that came before it. for a book to claim that the earth was made in days, is an isult to the wonders of the universe. I feel like it is offensive to the process that happens when planets are created. It's a real crutch, to say that a man made this planet, it really closes the door on trying to figure out what exactly did.
I've got a close friend, who is a transgendered (scary huh?), who is a NASA funded scientist who works on quantum loop gravity.. and I honestly feel like ideas like these are going to eventually disprove the idea of god created earth not just in the near future. I will then be content as a human being, not as man trying to feel like a god, but a man who has enough logic to comprehend a life without the need for one.
My life is not different than when I was a devout catholic, in fact it has been much more liberated. There are no more acts to reconcile with men who pretend to talk to Christ, there is only accountability to myself, and that in itself is much worse, and what drives me to be a better person. I do much more good now, for other humans than when I was convinced that humans were controlled by something we've never seen, heard, tasted or touched. There is no reason to believe in things you've never seen, but science? That you can see, and I encourage the creationists to read some science that wasn't done by other creationsits, I'm reading your links and watching your videos, but you would not watch or read mine? That is the kind of stuff that keeps you in your self contained bubble. I'm going to go back to being a great human/atheist. Bye for now.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!