Mitt 4 President of the Confederacy ?

Define normal. Please

I wrote a thesis for school titled "The New case for legal secession"
It's on my notebook, if any intrest I will post it for you to read,study, and maybe pass around. But yes, WE have the keys to victory my fellow Americans

Nice to see you here PREZ

None of us wanted O back in office, but giving Mitt the reigns to a country would be even more disastrous.

Also, if this "movement" gained any real foothold, it would be hilariously short. You can count on NATO boots on the back of your neck.

Mitt lost because he was unelectable. The republican party was purposefully sabotaged to ensure O got back in office.

Thank you. Hilariously short lived you say? NATO on OUR backs and neck? The globalist will not be allowed access to our shores. Foothold? We have had at our disposal, onehundred and forty seven years of tradition, with detailed instructions passed down generations.CSA

Indeed

The globalists are already here, but really, since when have the NATO and the UN exactly ever played by our rules on our own turf? They're already bitching about the legalization of cannabis in our country, passed legally by our representatives. They do what they want.

147 years ago, infa red cameras didn't exist, nor did drones and and a defense budget of global proportions. Not to mention, we've all been effectively disarmed. What's a hunting rifle going to do up against a belt-fed weapon and a tank that emits microwaves?

It's a pipe dream...

Truth be told, we could only hope for Mitt. The confederacy would wind up with a Bush. It's almost laughable. If it were to really happen, You'd have to dump anyone associated with national politics. Someone who wasn't already bought.

he would be the last person I would ever for 4 to Revolution

lol he would be the last person on earth I would ever vote for to lead the revolution to get back our country. you're bustin my chops.. you gotta be

What I'm saying is this. Present day, their are 'leaders' in office, that support OUR cause. including nurses, teachers, farmers, pilots,mechanics,engineer, Generals of past, intelligence workers, and a couple in the senate. We have not been disarmed in the least. We have the greatest weapon imaginable, a group of brothers with a goal, and the tools and disciplines to accomplish this goal. We have power in numbers and we seek justice.

If not for Miami Metro, he would have every southern state and a good chunk of the midwest. It really is like the CSA is still around. Anyone seen the movie made about if the CSA won the civil war and what life would be like today?

States with one little county being blue and that takes the vote for the whole state.

In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were ratified, in order to delineate the powers of the Congress relative to the states. In essence, the Articles of Confederation was the first governing document – the first national constitution – of the United States. How does this initial constitution describe the union of states?

In Article I, the document declares that “The style of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America." [Ibid. 21] A “confederacy”! The term, as defined by Merriam-Webster Dictionary, means “a league or compact for mutual support or common action: an alliance.” Article II states that “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled.” [Ibid.] Here the Articles of Confederation make reference, as did the Declaration of Independence, to states being sovereign, free, and independent. Article III states, “The said states hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other for their common defence, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.” [Ibid.] Clearly, a “firm league of friendship” is not synonymous with an inviolable union; the principle of sovereignty is unequivocally confirmed.

That to secure these [natural rights] rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”


Last Edited by TheCartel on 12/01/2012 03:40 AM

He was and still is 100% unelectable. The republican party might have been better off giving Jim Jones or L. Ron Hubbard the republican nomination.
Not to mention, he's just another globalist. If you were to secede, I'd hope that your new state would be ran by free men, not billionaire globalist cultists.

Oh, god, no.