Amazing chemtrail video shot from Fed Ex plane | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10993716 United States 12/01/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell ya what: It doesn't matter if anything is synced or who was flying the planes from which the videos were shot. The point is that the videos were shot from an aircraft and what they captured is undeniable. Those are NOT contrails. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21651258 So, if those trails are comprised of stuff being "sprayed" from the planes, just how long do you think they could keep "spraying" that volume of stuff from the contents of tanks which would fit in those aircraft? |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 12/01/2012 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In Chicago the air traffic is restricted during the ADC ops, would be impossible. Traffic resumes after the chemtrail has fully dissipated into a almost indiscernible haze. Somebody with a small aircraft should get a sample of that stoof. Might be weather control or maybe a shield/sunscreen. They could very well be protecting us from cosmic doom. Quoting: John Denver 26311467 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25915094 United States 12/01/2012 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A good way to verify chemtrails is the moment you see them, get online and check the satellite radar. You can see them on satellite because the nano-aluminum particles used in the dispersant is radar reflective. Contrails will not show up on the same radar, but chemtrails will. Watch them live at NOAA radar satellite. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No fence sitting here. Its all very clear now, how does one plane have a "contrail" at the same altitude the plane filming does not? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13876899 Contrails don't form directly behind the engines- there is a gap. You can't see whether the filming plane is creating any contrails. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28781099 United States 12/01/2012 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. You have posted 3 times, I can see you are a skeptic. The plane at 5:06 shows liquid spewing out, as for what liquid, I don't know but if it is harmless then why keep it a secret? Do you know what I mean? "Secrecy is the freedom tyrants dream of." -Bill Moyers |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28850762 Luxembourg 12/01/2012 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 12/01/2012 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, there is at least enough in one aircraft to completely cover 300 square miles of Chicagoland and its suburbs. Tens of thousands of gallons capacities, active ADC and diluents for spraying. So, if those trails are comprised of stuff being "sprayed" from the planes, just how long do you think they could keep "spraying" that volume of stuff from the contents of tanks which would fit in those aircraft? Quoting: Menow 18943200 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. You have posted 3 times, I can see you are a skeptic. The plane at 5:06 shows liquid spewing out, as for what liquid, I don't know but if it is harmless then why keep it a secret? Do you know what I mean? "Secrecy is the freedom tyrants dream of." -Bill Moyers See I knew you would misinterpret what I said (and no THIS post is the third comment I've posted). I am not a skeptic and stated clearly there is heavy chemtrailing activity going on everywhere. Over my town chemtrailers heading west for a session have their chemical tanks "off" and leave short-lived CONTRAILS water vapor behind. When they turn heading east their tanks are turned "on" leaving chemicals in the sky that last all day. I am only asking (on the verge of leaving this thread for want of facts) for some objectivity in what is actually being seen in this video. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28781099 United States 12/01/2012 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28781099 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. You have posted 3 times, I can see you are a skeptic. The plane at 5:06 shows liquid spewing out, as for what liquid, I don't know but if it is harmless then why keep it a secret? Do you know what I mean? "Secrecy is the freedom tyrants dream of." -Bill Moyers See I knew you would misinterpret what I said (and no THIS post is the third comment I've posted). I am not a skeptic and stated clearly there is heavy chemtrailing activity going on everywhere. Over my town chemtrailers heading west for a session have their chemical tanks "off" and leave short-lived CONTRAILS water vapor behind. When they turn heading east their tanks are turned "on" leaving chemicals in the sky that last all day. I am only asking (on the verge of leaving this thread for want of facts) for some objectivity in what is actually being seen in this video. You posted this: "Overall I would summarize this as drunken pin the tail on the donkey speculation." You expect a video to come out with full disclosure but what we all are dealing with here in reality is secretive, and we do not have that luxury. Like I said, the video shows some evidence, not all shots are good, but the one at 5:06 is not doubt a liquid substance and not a typical contrail. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yes, chemtrailing has been going on far too long to remain without open information and public control of any kind. Endless speculation drives me mad. So when it comes to being prevented to access so many things being done to people without their knowledge or consent that in itself is criminal homicide. I would be in a straitjacket if I had young children to worry about at this time in history. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 12/01/2012 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A good way to verify chemtrails is the moment you see them, get online and check the satellite radar. You can see them on satellite because the nano-aluminum particles used in the dispersant is radar reflective. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25915094 Contrails will not show up on the same radar, but chemtrails will. Watch them live at NOAA radar satellite. Radar? That's why I don't think its Govt, the satellite imagery would be 'made' unavailable on ADC ops days. Perhaps "real time scrubbing in future runs. :) In Chicago I go to the sats for the archived evidence of the chemtrails. Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 12/01/2012 01:21 PM |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... Old, tired, "woo" argument... Just because somebody bothers to say that something is wrong, means it must be right. Yawn... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16213681 You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. You have posted 3 times, I can see you are a skeptic. The plane at 5:06 shows liquid spewing out, as for what liquid, I don't know but if it is harmless then why keep it a secret? Do you know what I mean? "Secrecy is the freedom tyrants dream of." -Bill Moyers See I knew you would misinterpret what I said (and no THIS post is the third comment I've posted). I am not a skeptic and stated clearly there is heavy chemtrailing activity going on everywhere. Over my town chemtrailers heading west for a session have their chemical tanks "off" and leave short-lived CONTRAILS water vapor behind. When they turn heading east their tanks are turned "on" leaving chemicals in the sky that last all day. I am only asking (on the verge of leaving this thread for want of facts) for some objectivity in what is actually being seen in this video. You posted this: "Overall I would summarize this as drunken pin the tail on the donkey speculation." You expect a video to come out with full disclosure but what we all are dealing with here in reality is secretive, and we do not have that luxury. Like I said, the video shows some evidence, not all shots are good, but the one at 5:06 is not doubt a liquid substance and not a typical contrail. THIS IS NOT A CONTRAIL CONTROVERSY. Yes these are CHEMTRAILS, I am agreeing with you and have been from my first post. Are you reading my comments? Tanks off, contrails, Tanks on, chemtrails. Why is that hard. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... You know I think there is plenty of evidence both obvious as well as compound analysis there is massive chemtrail activity going on especially the last 7 or so years. That said, it doesn't mean all chemtrail speculation is correctly disseminated. 'k? *heavy sigh*...that also does not mean there is no room for broader perspectives outside of pro or con, black or white. I care not about those who say they're all contrails, the conversation has left them behind, although, there still are instances of contrails which do not negate the practice of chemtrailing. What do you plan to say to the "chemies" who claim that contrails always dissipate and chemtrails persist? How have those idiots not been "left behind" by the chemtrail argument? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28781099 United States 12/01/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... Old, tired, "woo" argument... Just because somebody bothers to say that something is wrong, means it must be right. Yawn... Yet after 9 pages, you are still here. Are you bored enough to post in a thread you don't care about or do you want to stir a shit pot? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... Old, tired, "woo" argument... Just because somebody bothers to say that something is wrong, means it must be right. Yawn... Yet after 9 pages, you are still here. Are you bored enough to post in a thread you don't care about or do you want to stir a shit pot? What? When did I say I don't care about it? If I didn't care I certainly wouldn't be posting. I am challenging the "logic" being presented here. You have a problem with someone doing that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246336 United States 12/01/2012 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28751135 United States 12/01/2012 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28781099 United States 12/01/2012 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28781099 You have posted 3 times, I can see you are a skeptic. The plane at 5:06 shows liquid spewing out, as for what liquid, I don't know but if it is harmless then why keep it a secret? Do you know what I mean? "Secrecy is the freedom tyrants dream of." -Bill Moyers See I knew you would misinterpret what I said (and no THIS post is the third comment I've posted). I am not a skeptic and stated clearly there is heavy chemtrailing activity going on everywhere. Over my town chemtrailers heading west for a session have their chemical tanks "off" and leave short-lived CONTRAILS water vapor behind. When they turn heading east their tanks are turned "on" leaving chemicals in the sky that last all day. I am only asking (on the verge of leaving this thread for want of facts) for some objectivity in what is actually being seen in this video. You posted this: "Overall I would summarize this as drunken pin the tail on the donkey speculation." You expect a video to come out with full disclosure but what we all are dealing with here in reality is secretive, and we do not have that luxury. Like I said, the video shows some evidence, not all shots are good, but the one at 5:06 is not doubt a liquid substance and not a typical contrail. THIS IS NOT A CONTRAIL CONTROVERSY. Yes these are CHEMTRAILS, I am agreeing with you and have been from my first post. Are you reading my comments? Tanks off, contrails, Tanks on, chemtrails. Why is that hard. funny... you don't read mine either, I have responded to to your complaints about why there aren't enough facts as well as quoted what you said that made you appear skeptical. I was saying- if you read it again- why I don't consider this video pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey speculation. Nontheless I aknowledge that you repeatedly have said you are not a skeptic.... is that better? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/01/2012 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know you're on to something when the contrailpeople start ridiculing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837919 exactly Woo forumula: Post ridiculous stuff- when people say it's ridiculous claim that means it's right. It has worked well for Nancy Lieder for many years. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246336 United States 12/01/2012 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28781099 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... Old, tired, "woo" argument... Just because somebody bothers to say that something is wrong, means it must be right. Yawn... Yet after 9 pages, you are still here. Are you bored enough to post in a thread you don't care about or do you want to stir a shit pot? What? When did I say I don't care about it? If I didn't care I certainly wouldn't be posting. I am challenging the "logic" being presented here. You have a problem with someone doing that? menow? hilarious |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213681 United States 12/01/2012 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When they turn heading east their tanks are turned "on" leaving chemicals in the sky that last all day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16213681 And what do you imagine the volume of material required to do that would be? There would have to be chemical tanks in the cargo mixing with other varying types of dispersants, depending on compounds sprayed. I don't know what you mean by "volume" since I'm not employed by corporate gov't interests to understand details of executing these runs. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28466908 United States 12/01/2012 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A good way to verify chemtrails is the moment you see them, get online and check the satellite radar. You can see them on satellite because the nano-aluminum particles used in the dispersant is radar reflective. Contrails will not show up on the same radar, but chemtrails will. Watch them live at NOAA radar satellite. Satellite radar?? All weather radars are on the ground. Perhaps you mean satellite photos?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22793081 United States 12/01/2012 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hmm.... just how many gallons of "chemicals" were there on that plane to spray for as long as it did? At the rate it looked liked it was "spraying" there had to be tens of thousands of gallons on board. I have a hard time believing you could fit that much on board, when a C-130J can hold 3900 gallons of fire-retardant. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28781099 United States 12/01/2012 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28781099 Yup, if the video was bad or way inaccurate- they wouldn't even bother posting. It is obviously ruffling some feathers here.... Old, tired, "woo" argument... Just because somebody bothers to say that something is wrong, means it must be right. Yawn... Yet after 9 pages, you are still here. Are you bored enough to post in a thread you don't care about or do you want to stir a shit pot? What? When did I say I don't care about it? If I didn't care I certainly wouldn't be posting. I am challenging the "logic" being presented here. You have a problem with someone doing that? No, I question your reason. You want people to tell you the volume or how much the tank holds, as if they know. We have a video with little explanation, yet it is clear some of these are not contrails. Would you like to explain that? Do you want us all to change our minds and believe these are really contrails? |