|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Amazing chemtrail video shot from Fed Ex plane
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Menow |
|
Post Content
|
...Look at it this way: The containment agents/shills keep saying these are contrails, right? Then a particular shill keeps asking how much liquid would have to be carried to produce a long alleged chemtrail, because he's trying to imply that not enough liquid could be on board to make these long trails. Well, if the argument of the shills is that these are ordinary contrails, then we can safely say that in just the fuel amounts of a large aircraft, alone, there is enough liquid to lay a trail the length of an intercontinental flight :) How long is that? From Signapore to Newark, NJ is 19 hours. The Airbus A-340 model that Singapore and Emirates fly is designed to go farther than any other jet, a maximum 10,200 miles without refueling. [ link to usatoday30.usatoday.com] Soooooo........ I guess it's safe to say that a tanker could hold enough liquid, that when dispersed in open air, it could cover many hundreds of miles (and that's being conservative). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28781099 Not at all. That wasn't my argument. You are begging the question(true meaning of that expression). No one is saying that aircraft can't fly that far. One gallon of material could be dispersed over the entire planet- that is not the issue at all. The ISSUE is whether one aircraft can "spray" enough material to obscure 300 sq miles of sky. You need to prove that it can't. Provide your proof. Actually I don't. It is so very telling that chemtrail pushers never consider the need do take that into consideration. You apparently believe that whatever you think is being "sprayed" out of aircraft and the ability to expand in an unlimited fashion. Additionally, I've seen several planes spray and obscure the sky so go ahead and prove that that can't happen, too. I don't get care to get hung up on the ONE plane issue.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21651258 You don't have to worry about any of that as long as you believe that contrails don't persist and aren't artificial clouds which can expand and become larger clouds. They certainly can, and do- regardless of your refusal to accept that. contrailscience.com You are, in effect, claiming that there no such thing as contrails and never has been. Apparently you are denying the whole foundation of atmospheric science. Heh... I wonder... what do YOU think allows small clouds to become larger clouds?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
