N.S.A Whistleblower Mr William Binney // Must See Video !!!

Imbeded:



[link to www.YouTube.com]

RT



[link to www.youtube.com]

Narus (company)

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

What a show hey.

After he left the NSA in 2001, Binney was one of several people investigated as part of an inquiry into the 2005 New York Times exposé on the agency’s warrantless eavesdropping program. Binney was cleared of wrongdoing after three interviews with FBI agents beginning in March 2007, but one morning in July 2007, a dozen agents armed with rifles appeared at his house, with one of them entering the bathroom where Binney was toweling off after a shower, pointing a gun at him. In that raid, the FBI confiscated a desktop computer, disks and personal and business records. The NSA revoked his security clearance, forcing him to close a business he ran with former colleagues, which cost him a reported $300,000 annual income.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]


The violations of the constitution and any number of laws that existed at the time. That was the part that I could not be associated with. That’s why I left (in 2001). They were building social networks on who is communicating and with whom inside this country. So that the entire social network of everybody, of every US citizen was being compiled overtime. So, they are taking from one company alone roughly 320 million records a day. That’s probably accumulated probably close to 20 trillion over the years.

The original program that we put together to handle this to be able to identify terrorists anywhere in the world and alert anyone that they were in jeopardy. We would have been able to do that by encrypting everybody’s communications except those who were targets. So, in essence you would protect their identities and the information about them until you could develop probable cause, and once you showed your probable cause, then you could do a decrypt and target them. And we could do that and isolate those people all alone. It wasn’t a problem at all. There was no difficulty in that.

[link to rt.com]


Also from that interview:

They are violating the foundation of this entire country. Why this entire government was formed? It’s founded with the Constitution and the (natural rights of the people recognized by) that Constitution. They are in violation of that. And under executive order 13526, section 1.7 – you can not classify information to just cover up a crime, which this is, and that was signed by President Obama. Also President Bush signed it earlier as an executive order, a very similar one. If any of this comes into Supreme Court and they rule it unconstitutional, then the entire house of cards of the government falls.

After he left the NSA in 2001, Binney was one of several people investigated as part of an inquiry into the 2005 New York Times exposé on the agency’s warrantless eavesdropping program. Binney was cleared of wrongdoing after three interviews with FBI agents beginning in March 2007, but one morning in July 2007, a dozen agents armed with rifles appeared at his house, with one of them entering the bathroom where Binney was toweling off after a shower, pointing a gun at him. In that raid, the FBI confiscated a desktop computer, disks and personal and business records. The NSA revoked his security clearance, forcing him to close a business he ran with former colleagues, which cost him a reported $300,000 annual income.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]


Binney: The violations of the constitution and any number of laws that existed at the time. That was the part that I could not be associated with. That’s why I left (in 2001). They were building social networks on who is communicating and with whom inside this country. So that the entire social network of everybody, of every US citizen was being compiled overtime. So, they are taking from one company alone roughly 320 million records a day. That’s probably accumulated probably close to 20 trillion over the years.

The original program that we put together to handle this to be able to identify terrorists anywhere in the world and alert anyone that they were in jeopardy. We would have been able to do that by encrypting everybody’s communications except those who were targets. So, in essence you would protect their identities and the information about them until you could develop probable cause, and once you showed your probable cause, then you could do a decrypt and target them. And we could do that and isolate those people all alone. It wasn’t a problem at all. There was no difficulty in that.

[link to rt.com]


Also from the same interview:

They are violating the foundation of this entire country. Why this entire government was formed? It’s founded with the Constitution and the (natural rights of the people recognized by) that Constitution. They are in violation of that. And under executive order 13526, section 1.7 – you can not classify information to just cover up a crime, which this is, and that was signed by President Obama. Also President Bush signed it earlier as an executive order, a very similar one. If any of this comes into Supreme Court and they rule it unconstitutional, then the entire house of cards of the government falls.

Clearly systematic, bipartisan & preceding the events of September 2001 which were used to justify programs well in place already.

Systematic. Top to bottom, left to right. Federal, state & local. A violation of legal & natural rights.

I predict The Supreme Court will hear this case & offer its ruling within the year.

I guess this isn't anything the NSA forum would be interested in?

Oops, I mean GLP ... silly me.

Of special note — the timeline presented by Binney underminds all of the justifications used by the War on Terror crowd. These data-collection networks were long established, policy decisions had already been set, citizens rights to privacy (as codified at that time) were already being violated. This is pre-Patriot Act. Pre 9-11. Yet none of this prevented what followed.

Cannot believe this (Binney) hasn't got more play on forums. A shame. A real shame.

"Whereas it appeareth that however certain forms of government are better calculated than others to protect individuals in the free exercise of their natural rights, and are at the same time themselves better guarded against degeneracy, yet experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms, those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny; and it is believed that the most effectual means of preventing this would be, to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts, which history exhibiteth, that, possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes."

— Thomas Jefferson

Familiarize yourselves with the concept of limited hangout — in the case of recent news reports: keeping the conversation focused on post-2001, post-Patriot act.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Preparations for what was to follow? Foreknowledge would suggest complicity, at the very least.

Binney mentions "social networks" in this RT interview. This hits closer to the mark than electronic data mining, although that is part of the enhanced network.

Think informants. Think neighborhood watch. Except rather than reporting criminality, they hand out life sentences for planting tulips in the wrong part of the yard.

A whole lot of pent up rage bubbling to the surface over tulips. That's what it comes down to.

Binney's wikipedia profile has been edited significantly since this was posted last week. Doing their best (Binney included, apparently) to suggest his resignation was a response to post 9-11 changes, as opposed to the lead-up as previously claimed & documented.

FYI