A Tribute to Communism

...


So that's why they were literally dying to get out?

Because it was so equal and everybody shared and felt so well taken care of by one another?

Morons.

Let go of your phony definitions and look at HISTORY.

It repeats because idiots like you REFUSE to LEARN from it.

...


Scholars are a specialist among a branch of study. communism is a branch of economics. Communist scholars do exist.

...


I don't deny that post-Stalin Soviet Union was oppressive, but I deny that Soviet Union was EVER a communist country. They were a socialist country under Stalin, and reverted back to state capitalism shortly before Stalin's death. Implementing communism takes stages and progress, from capitalism to socialism to communism. Just because communists won revolutions Doesnt mean they instantly implemented communism, it would be absurd to think that economic systems change overnight.

...


Communists do abolish private property absolutely yes, but they don't abolish personal property. Here's the difference between private property and personal property. Personal property is your wife, your kids, your house, your car, your clothes, your things. Private property is the mode of production. Modes of production are land, labor, capital, and enterpreuership. Land can be both personal and private property, but land ownership that communists want to abolish are typically the land used for production, such as land that is used for drilling, mining, farming etc. Once private property is abolished it becomes socially owned.

This does not abolish individual motivation because communists still rewards you with personal property items such as homes, cars, clothes etc..

oligarchy: A small group of people who control a country, organization, or institution. Hey that sounds like capitalism!

"During the time between the sales pitch and the collapse, Communism blames its failures on internal disloyalty."

I'm glad you brought up that point. Communists experience counter-revolutionaries, those are the people who indeed are executed in their terror regimes. Your assumption that communists kill INNOCENTS is flawed.

Here's another tidbit for the general public, capitalists DO get involved in communists revolutions and kill the communists as well. Neither side is innocent of killing. neither side is killing innocents, but communists revolutionaries ARE wars, and indeed war causes food disruptions and killings, but that isn't the goal of communism as a system, that is the side effect of the fact that they are in WAR.

...

Oh, I see...so the millions upon millions slaughtered in the PROGRESSION to Communism are ok....cause, you know, it was only the FIRST STEP to Communism....not actually the glory of Communism itself?

It really is a mental illness, isn't it?

...


Oh, this will be fun. You really want to challenge me to a duel on linguistics, history, and philosophy?


Definitions are only valid if they reflect reality. Defining a thing using language which does not accurately reflect its actual attributes results in an invalid definition.

Please, feel free to submit your invalid definition, and I'll fix the bitch for you, gratis.

...

Well of course, do you think the capitalists just freely gives up their power? those millions upon millions killed are capitalists. Here, you try to implement communism and see if you can do it without anyone trying to stop you.

...


Know this:
When the state protection mechanisms fail, and you are responsible for your own safety, and it's totally up to you to live long enough to progress the glorious workers' revolution of Communism, I won't be the only one hunting you parasites for sport.

I don't deny that post-Stalin Soviet Union was oppressive,

...


No the millions on millions weren't capitalists. Most were initially WORKERS who supported the takeover.

Til they found out it was really a totalitarian nightmare.

THEN they said...Hmmmm....Maybe my life wasn't so bad before. Maybe I can escape or use the same tactics we used to bring in this mess. Not so much.

...


those workers were the ones executing capitalists under Stalin's orders. Why would stalin execute his largest supporters? Communism is SPECIFICALLY designed to appeal to the worker's class and is where communists draw their power, why be so absurd and think that communists would betray their comrades.

...


How about the during-Stalin Soviet Union?

...


More complicated. Stalin strove to implement democracy, other communists were afraid that the capitalists would regain power, so they prevented democratic reforms.

...


Not even Hitler randomly killed people. Use your own sense and logic rather than using secondary sources. Perhaps Some evidence that Stalin killed because people were out past curfew would be nice, but not even capitalist sources that I have read have claimed something so absurd as this video above implies.

...


More complicated. Stalin strove to implement democracy, other communists were afraid that the capitalists would regain power, so they prevented democratic reforms.

On. Sight.
/done wasting time talking to a future trophy

I don't deny that post-Stalin Soviet Union was oppressive,

...


Not even Hitler randomly killed people. Use your own sense and logic rather than using secondary sources. Perhaps Some evidence that Stalin killed because people were out past curfew would be nice, but not even capitalist sources that I have read have claimed something so absurd as this video above implies.

...


On sight, motherfucker.

On sight.

...


Ever heard of the Moscow trials? It's not a myth, Soviet Union had a court system. They didnt kill people on sight after the revolution was over.