UN leaves Syria ... Things are moving fast

RT: US Military Planning Syrian Invasion (Gulf War/WMD part 2)

They move them around out the way of rebels and fighting areas even the US goverment has said in the past

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is accusing the Syrian government of serious violations of the 1974 agreement that separated Israeli and Syrian forces in the Golan Heights and is calling on both countries to halt firing across the cease-fire line.

Ban urged Syria to stop deploying troops and military equipment in the disputed zone.

In a report to the U.N. Security Council circulated Monday, Ban said recent incidents across the cease-fire line have shown the potential to escalate Israeli-Syrian tensions, and jeopardize the agreement and the region's stability.

I see...now that Israel is involved, he gives a shit about Syria all of a sudden.

and the US government never lies...eat it up sheep!

Obama...."Assad, the world is watching..."

Yeah we've been watching...50,000 dead later, what are we going to do about it?

i think Saddam was Mabus because ever since his death its been war after war and death after death

more fake ass propaganda to control the idiots..

all for getting everyone under the arms of the central banks..

slaves... forver... weak pathetic slaves..

I'm mad as hell, and i am not going to take it anymore

NO Shit!

Gonna play Call of Duty again?

Why do I smell a False Flag coming up?

If the red line is crossed.. 50,000 troops will be sent in.
A no fly zone and a neutral zone for refugees fleeing to Turkey. WMD's have to be secured and destroyed safely.
This could escalate quickly.

A sensible scenario that can be read between the lines:

Sarin is produced by two chemicals, we'll call them Chem A and Chem B.

Everything is fine, safe, and "proper" as long as A and B are stored far away from one another, in distantly separate buildings.

Weaponised sarin is produced when A and B physically combine, like in a blender (or a whirling missile that slams a glass vial of A into an adjascent glass vial of B).

Placing cylinders of A and B side by side (or in the same building) means that they are no longer "stored properly".

Placing vials of them together side by side in a warhead means they are really, really no longer stored properly.

When the two vials get dropped together in a warhead, then that is when they physically combine and produce the sarin.

Perhaps our latest news reports are that quantities of A and B have been transported into one facility. They "could" still be separated and rendered safe, but it would be kind of dangerous to move them around unnecessarily once they are that close together. In short, there is no reason to go moving them together into one facility unless you intend to weaponise them into sarin.
Just one scenario, but it is sensible, and fits all of the bits of data that we have now.

I wonder how long it will be before Hillary goes before the UN claiming Syria has "Yellow Cake" and that we need freedom bombs to stop Asad...

And then giggle when he dies.

Yes, spreading democracy every where she goes. Like johnny Appleseed.

Last Edited by Desert Fox on 12/03/2012 06:53 PM

Hope you weren't calling me a cunt...I'm pissed because I don't see the world helping the civilians including our PO(tu)S...

shit just got real

[link to img.pr0gramm.com]

I haven't felt this kind of DOOM since Gaza!

vodka
clearly

more like jonny rapeseed.

Yup

It is very possible an under ground attempt at Israel is in the works. Considering Al Qaeda has been after this stuff for a while now. With 12-21-2012 coming up the assailants might use a hi-jacking technique of a religious holiday or substantial date for mass impact.

An attack on 12-21-2012 would have a stronger impact versus an attack on a normal day with little significance.

I dread the idea of chemical weapons. For the sake of innocent lives, women with little children, I hope they are not deployed.

The alternative idea, false flag, is just a damning. It points to a broad war in the region growing.

Good advice, thanks for the reminder!

well he did say, he would use them if attacked by outside forces, but not on his own people. Which makes sense, and what any nation with the capability would do to protect themselves.

Hes just sticking to his word.

If the world does not want to see destruction, then stop supporting the terrorist....and encouraging other countries to attack.

When it comes down to the fight, the people on the side lines wont be forgotten.

Just sayin

[link to security.blogs.cnn.com]

Earlier in the day, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned the United States was prepared to act if Syria used chemical arms, saying that step would cross a red line previously drawn by President Barack Obama.

“I’m not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice it to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur,” Clinton told reporters.

Syria made a statement that they would NEVER use chemical weapons on their citizens. I'm sure if they don't use them, then the "somebody" will make it happen so the US can take action. As stated by a few in other threads and forums, Syria will be the catalyst to get us back in the Middle East at full force.