| Users Online Now: 2,085 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,408,338 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,328,060 | Threads Today: 878 | Posts Today: 15,784 |
| 10:26 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,085 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,408,338 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,328,060 | Threads Today: 878 | Posts Today: 15,784 |
| 10:26 PM | ||
Poll: Human experiment, if we lived in a society without money.................. | |
| Manu-Koelbren Offer Upgrade  User ID: 28993937  Spain12/04/2012 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 529006  United States12/04/2012 05:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29047478  Australia12/04/2012 05:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Manu-Koelbren (OP) User ID: 28993937 Spain12/04/2012 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is not my stance btw, I am actually sure that if this thread was pinned and people actually participated you'd see that the majority would vote for conforming with the basics, thus making the point that people actually have motivation to work because they need to sustain themselves, and if they wouldn't have that need they wouldn't see the need to do so anymore. In that case you better have some robots ready to do the work, or else the whole of civilization would quickly revert to the stone age. Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.” |
| Judethz User ID: 20521597  United Kingdom12/04/2012 06:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an hypothetical scenario which is unrealistic because it doesn't take into account the fact that all those free basic needs would have to be provided/developed/built by someone before the system could even be implemented, but let's participate regardless just for the sake of knowing how most would react in such scenario. Quoting: Manu-Koelbren  Well OK then. Basically I'm in favour of the small business model. Which means NO McDonalds, Burger King and other giants taking control. |
| Manu-Koelbren (OP) User ID: 28993937 Spain12/04/2012 07:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an hypothetical scenario which is unrealistic because it doesn't take into account the fact that all those free basic needs would have to be provided/developed/built by someone before the system could even be implemented, but let's participate regardless just for the sake of knowing how most would react in such scenario. Quoting: Manu-Koelbren Well OK then. Basically I'm in favour of the small business model. Which means NO McDonalds, Burger King and other giants taking control.I agree with that, but in a nationalistic environment. Meaning you could go to Israel and start your small business there among your people, but not anywhere near white non Jewish European folk.  Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.” |
