SO when did the moon start waxing from top to bottom? POLE SHIFT HAS BEGUN!

As always you haven't proved it is wrong. What you have proved is you are willfully ignorant and likely can't visualize anything in 3 dimensions.

Just open a book. You still did not read such a simple things and you call ignorant people, what a shame you are. Not a good example of an american guy at all.

Same here, noticed this last summer. Definitely something you'll remember, especially if you've spent any time concentrating on things like this before. I'm not an avid stargazer either, but well aware of the basics and how things should look or have looked like before.

Now what's kind of weird is that these are clear signals of such huge changes having already taken place, that all of those more enthusiastic gazers most definitely would pick them up immediately. As far as I can tell, it seems no-one has noticed a thing - except here of course, and among other groups of people tuned into the possibility that things may always not be as we've been told. So why the silence? Are we perhaps living in alternate realities, or could it be people just keep their mouths shut since what they're witnessing is "too crazy" for them to accept as truth? Difficult to say, and interesting to see how things are going to fold out!

Wiki's chart does not show you the effect of field rotation, nor could it, especially for both northern and hemisphere observers; it depends on observer position. The moon was waning gibbous last night and approaching last quarter. The last quarter moon RISES at midnight.

No it is not.

Anyway you will not find in such a book that the moon can rotates up in 90 desgrees in a session rise/set.

That's another simple fact you can verify yourself whenever you want. Period.

Aha- that helps. Evidently I need some time "de-conspiracy-ing" (for lack of a better or real term.) Not to mention, I watched 2012 last night. I think I'll go make some bread. That will help to plant my feet back on the ground.

Just open a book. You still did not read such a simple things and you call ignorant people, what a shame you are. Not a good example of an american guy at all.

Read the last post i wrote instead moran!

Just open a f**** book. That's all you have to do, not reading a user posting nonsense.

[link to www.barnesandnoble.com]
Buy this book and read pages 11-14.

I hope he is trolling, or it's really pathetic.

Just open a f**** book. That's all you have to do, not reading a user posting nonsense.

Not that I need to explain it to you, but I happen to trust Dr. Astro's explanations and judgement. Go find another thread to play in.

Do not post random crap again and again, now if you are sure there is something written in that **** book, just reported it here. Otherwise its just your bs stuff only.

So far you've still managed to post absolutely nothing. Just in case people actually believe your stupidity I'll link this. Its from Nasa

[link to solarsystem.nasa.gov]

Instead of posting the same stupid random links, just shout down toy computer, its a waste of time in energy and pollution as well. That's the only good thing you may are to do (maybe).

Do not post random crap again and again, now if you are sure there is something written in that **** book, just reported it here. Otherwise its just your bs stuff only.

"At the time of "new" Moon, the cusps or "horns" of the crescent sometimes lie in a line which is nearly perpendicular with the horizon, and at other times in a line nearly parallel with the horizon. In the former case the Moon is commonly described as "wet" Moon, and in the latter case as a "dry" Moon..."

Lots more in the book itself, of course.

And is that for you a scientific explanation?

It's the same of the nasa's fraaky link posted before.