Nice post. I agree with your numerologicalness. I however disagree with your interpretation of the Fiscal Cliff. The way I read the situation, the country needs to go over the fiscal cliff. I personally think that Obama is a puppet (I could be wrong((I also think Romeny was a puppet))) However, I also think that a true leader would take us over the cliff. The reason I think this way is because spending has gotten out of control. Corruption is major rampant.

We are either going to go on like this and crash the dollar or we are going to reassert capital spending and crash the dollar anyway (IMHO Obama will just sieze more control for the elite corporate structure while half the people in the U.S. will be convinced that is for the greater good. Romney was never meant to be the prez and could have never pulled this off.)

If you haven't guessed I have an affinity for Ron Paul. I think he was the only one with the affinity to bring about change that is fair, balanced and saves the dollar. Not that I think the dollar is all that important. In the end the elite will have plenty of dollars to exchange for whatever the new currency will be and the workers will still be living pay check to pay check. I just beilieve that Ron Paul has the wisdom to transition without the hiccup.

Another possability is that somehow the fiscal cliff is avoided and the U.S continues to inflate its currency without much reprucussion because the balance of power is in our favor for another 1000% inflation. The top 2% will become the top 1% and the workers will still live a better quality and free life than in any other country. How long can this go on? Geitner bets that we can work it out either way.

I guess I am perhaps overthinking this thing and don't really know what is going to happen. These are just some of the possabilities that I percieve.

In short, I just think there is more going on than the rich people pissed about paying more taxes because we shouldn't be paying an income tax in the first place. TPTB have a way of getting people to argue about things that shouldn't even exist. Once people accept that the arguemnet exists than when a winner is declared it reinforces the existance of the arguements existence in the first place and further justifies the outcome. I have seen it before.