Need ideas for Sociology presentation | |
mopar28m User ID: 14265444 United States 12/04/2012 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Conflict theory? There's the vaccination issue. Inequality of sociological classes. hmmmm.....coming up with a blank now. (hated sociology in high school) vaccinefreehealth blogspot com The risk far outweighs any benefit as the risk will vary from child to child. facebook.com/graphixyourway |
This Is Not Me User ID: 20398856 United States 12/04/2012 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to make a presentation for my class about a sociological issue that I can relate to conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or functionalism. I'm having trouble coming up with ideas and I was hoping someone here might have some good ideas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26203141 What are your interests? That's always good place to start. Also, what level sociology are you in? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27988886 United States 12/04/2012 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28618054 United States 12/04/2012 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You might use a famous novel about a Russian work camp. It is only about 100 pages and covers a single day of a prisoners life. It was written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn and is titled "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26988139 United States 12/04/2012 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to make a presentation for my class about a sociological issue that I can relate to conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or functionalism. I'm having trouble coming up with ideas and I was hoping someone here might have some good ideas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26203141 How fear(sociological issue) relates to conflict theory... theres a presentation.. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26203141 United States 12/04/2012 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to make a presentation for my class about a sociological issue that I can relate to conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or functionalism. I'm having trouble coming up with ideas and I was hoping someone here might have some good ideas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26203141 What are your interests? That's always good place to start. Also, what level sociology are you in? I'm a taking college level 101 course at my community college, we have a lot of freedom to choose the topic but at the same time I kind of wish we had a little more direction it can basically be anything related to human behavior. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29089283 United States 12/04/2012 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
This Is Not Me User ID: 20398856 United States 12/04/2012 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | (Blumer's premises: Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they ascribe to those things. The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others and the society. These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he encounters.) |
New Age Messiah User ID: 9993365 United States 12/04/2012 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28618054 United States 12/04/2012 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Study up on Erving Goffmans dramaturgical analysis. He used terms from theater to describe how people act in public and in private (acting, role playing, onstage performance, back stage performance, etc). It is a symbolic interactionist methodology. It's really easy to come up with something interesting using this analysis type. You could apply it to total institutions, deviance, work environments, anything. Just pick any social interaction between people and analyze it. |
Let Freedom Ring User ID: 24105647 United States 12/04/2012 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26203141 United States 12/04/2012 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26203141 United States 12/04/2012 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28688993 Malaysia 12/04/2012 11:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
This Is Not Me User ID: 20398856 United States 12/04/2012 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How about 'reality is a social construction'. Not the physical world, but the social world. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28688993 You cannot give me a piece of society, it doesn't exist except as a social construction. Maybe too much of a headfuck for college though. In the case of symbolic interactionism, the problem is not one of determining whether an objective reality exists (philosophy), but rather our definition of the situation (sociology). |
abeliever Members User ID: 17868616 United States 12/04/2012 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since I actually have a degree in Sociology, I better put out an appropriate idea for you: consider symbolic interactionism using Blumer's three premises and apply it to how people greet one another and how our behavior can be modified (through expectation and response) by the presence of a greeting or the absence of a greeting and go from there. Quoting: This Is Not Me (Blumer's premises: Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they ascribe to those things. The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others and the society. These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he encounters.) This should help you, OP. Like think of examples of this. One I can think of is how people dress to interview for a job. If you wear a suit and tie compared to wearing trendy clothes, you will be assessed completely differently by the interviewer because of the three premises above. Like, the interviewer has an understanding of what a suit means to him/her. This meaning has become this to the interviewer because of what the interviewer experienced with suits in his/her life, etc. This understanding of the suit is customized by the interviewer or in his/her mind. What you may think of a suit is completely different than what I might think of a suit.... Now apply these premises to anything is society. Like the election. What made people choose Obama? Was it them thinking he could relate to them and assure them they would be given what they hoped for from a President? Why? What models did they impose on him? Was it blacks voting for another black? Poor voting for someone who they think was poor and could understand their issues? Or just plain, grew up in family voting democrat so vote democrat? Then foods...I'm Italian, I like Italian food. I'm not too crazy about bizare foods, they scare me. Why? I don't know. Maybe I'm chicken to try them because I have a predisposed assessment of other foods? Keep trying - anything can fit the premises above! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20193680 United States 12/04/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26203141 United States 12/05/2012 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since I actually have a degree in Sociology, I better put out an appropriate idea for you: consider symbolic interactionism using Blumer's three premises and apply it to how people greet one another and how our behavior can be modified (through expectation and response) by the presence of a greeting or the absence of a greeting and go from there. Quoting: This Is Not Me (Blumer's premises: Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they ascribe to those things. The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others and the society. These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he encounters.) This should help you, OP. Like think of examples of this. One I can think of is how people dress to interview for a job. If you wear a suit and tie compared to wearing trendy clothes, you will be assessed completely differently by the interviewer because of the three premises above. Like, the interviewer has an understanding of what a suit means to him/her. This meaning has become this to the interviewer because of what the interviewer experienced with suits in his/her life, etc. This understanding of the suit is customized by the interviewer or in his/her mind. What you may think of a suit is completely different than what I might think of a suit.... Now apply these premises to anything is society. Like the election. What made people choose Obama? Was it them thinking he could relate to them and assure them they would be given what they hoped for from a President? Why? What models did they impose on him? Was it blacks voting for another black? Poor voting for someone who they think was poor and could understand their issues? Or just plain, grew up in family voting democrat so vote democrat? Then foods...I'm Italian, I like Italian food. I'm not too crazy about bizare foods, they scare me. Why? I don't know. Maybe I'm chicken to try them because I have a predisposed assessment of other foods? Keep trying - anything can fit the premises above! Yea I get what your saying I could probably use a model like that. Right now i'm thinking of how I might use it to relate to censorship |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29031952 United States 12/05/2012 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
abeliever Members User ID: 17868616 United States 12/05/2012 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since I actually have a degree in Sociology, I better put out an appropriate idea for you: consider symbolic interactionism using Blumer's three premises and apply it to how people greet one another and how our behavior can be modified (through expectation and response) by the presence of a greeting or the absence of a greeting and go from there. Quoting: This Is Not Me (Blumer's premises: Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they ascribe to those things. The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others and the society. These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he encounters.) This should help you, OP. Like think of examples of this. One I can think of is how people dress to interview for a job. If you wear a suit and tie compared to wearing trendy clothes, you will be assessed completely differently by the interviewer because of the three premises above. Like, the interviewer has an understanding of what a suit means to him/her. This meaning has become this to the interviewer because of what the interviewer experienced with suits in his/her life, etc. This understanding of the suit is customized by the interviewer or in his/her mind. What you may think of a suit is completely different than what I might think of a suit.... Now apply these premises to anything is society. Like the election. What made people choose Obama? Was it them thinking he could relate to them and assure them they would be given what they hoped for from a President? Why? What models did they impose on him? Was it blacks voting for another black? Poor voting for someone who they think was poor and could understand their issues? Or just plain, grew up in family voting democrat so vote democrat? Then foods...I'm Italian, I like Italian food. I'm not too crazy about bizare foods, they scare me. Why? I don't know. Maybe I'm chicken to try them because I have a predisposed assessment of other foods? Keep trying - anything can fit the premises above! Yea I get what your saying I could probably use a model like that. Right now i'm thinking of how I might use it to relate to censorship Someone else suggested communication. That's a good idea too. Just think of the wealth of examples there. We live in a society where you can create an identity online! We can adjust that identity to anything we want thru social media. How people are viewed on the internet in fb etc is what shapes our society today. People can damage others lives through a ficticious identity , aka bullying. How we view each other on GLP. All these ACs and OPs are sharing personalities and shaping the GLP society. They are different in many ways, what they are really like in reality could astound us. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28988802 Australia 12/05/2012 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |