Moon Hoax Proof: There is NOT a Single Photo of the First Step on the Moon.

yes. does google not work for you? how sad.

How sad what?

there are lot of bullshit infos online, SO let me see the stuff on nasa site if that's so easy to find.

Otherwise also for you ----->



-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 09:56 AM

Okay, Im normally one to support this type of opinion in regaurds to the moon, however, that picture just made me laugh... literally. They are take at different angles, hence reflections in one, and not in the other. Notice the pic on the right has more "space" to the lefT? Different capture angles.

Last Edited by CriticalThinking on 12/13/2012 09:59 AM

I know that, BUT where those "reflections" comes from?

Where did you come from?

...this stupid cheese trolling man.

Why would you think ANYONE would do YOUR work for you when you do stuff like throw around "shill" accusations to everyone that you disagree with?

The green circle is over a window. In the pic on the left you don't see the reflection of the Moon's surface. On the right you do. The red circle is metal. It is being seen from different angles. So what?

As predicted you don't have a clue where to find the info requested.




-





Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 10:11 AM

Light source = Sun or suns light reflected off surface?

Reflection from .... metalics, which reflect? Lol Im sorry I really don't understand where you are getting at with this. Point being, those two pictures are taken from different angles. Hence you can't say "look this one shows this" and "this one doesnt". For objects dissapearing and reapearing, yes, maybe. But with reflections or shadows; two pictures with different angles, especially on the moon where scales REALLY mess with most peoples mind, cannot be used for comparison.

This is why I have such a hard time fully believing we didn't land on the moon. Sceptics almost convince me then turn around and pull stupid shit like this.

"It's common sense that no matter what those thrusters should have dispersed dust"

Then turn around and NOT use the same said COMMON SENSE, ignoring angles, scales, and reflective surfaces. It just blows my mind.

Oh you wished. How bad do you feel now when you can't smash the banhammer on anyone who doesn't play your retarded game?
Go cry you braindead waste of matter.

You simply DID NOT answer the question, just bla bla, your CriticalThinking as a nick its a shame.



-

Not sure the pilot's window is seeing moon there...from the looks of the (cropped and unlabeled pic -- typical Jack White work?) it is approaching critical angle and this might be close enough to start catching some sunlight off one of the layers of the glass.

You didn't predict anything but thanks for proving my point.
-


And thanks for proving you can't even spell out your own argument.

could be.

... and dont forget to link the nasa site about your BS remote camera claim, BUT hey, it's so easy to find it using GOOGLE (rofl) that you are still here quoting me trolling nonsense wasting your time shill, right?








-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 11:12 AM

What part of "why should I do your work for you" do you not understand? Especially when you try to insult everyone you disagree with? It is far more fun watching you avoid doing a simple google search anyway. Really exposes you for the troll you are.

so DO IT Shill, F*** DO IT! EXPOSE ME.



-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 10:30 AM

Thanks again for proving my point.

That's a simple fact.

Now you telle me.


===================

Okay smartypants. Produce the photo showing your birth coming out of your mom's womb. YOu can't produce it so that shows you have no proof that you were born. That is just an assumption.
You were told that you were born. You never experienced your birth and that is a fact. Prove it.

Sounds like a 10-year-old.

Grow up.

Use some logic.

You're just sounding like a retard at this point.

Whatever.

You are F.O.S. that's why you did not link anything of you BS claim and even a big moran.





...another one here, you mean the logic of the lies?





-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 10:36 AM

It is hilarious the trouble you'll go to just to avoid a simple google search. also hilarious that you think ANYONE will do anything for you when you resort immediately to insults. But that's what trolls do right?

Don't feed the trolls folks, you know who they are now.

Don't waste your time replying serious to DUCM900.
He actually believes the moon is a hologram. The tides are just the earth pulsating.
Just troll the shit out of him, he is desperate for attention.

That I will agree with. Everybody should know you for the troll you are.

That's obvious answer and well predicted from you.

However thanks for bumping the thread up. You are good for just this stuff.



-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 10:53 AM

I have no pics of my birth. Clearly my birth was a hoax.

^^^^ This is what I was getting at OP. All I was doing was discrediting that ONE picture, and if anything this should be used to your advantage. That just how silly that picture is. There are multiple explinations for that picture, and it boils down to photo capture angle.

Simply put, don't use this picture to furthur your arguement. Even someone like myself who has been trying to find more proof we DIDN'T land on the moon thinks that picture proves nothing.

Imagine trying to convince a spectic with a crappy "proof" picture like that? It just makes youre arguement less viable. That's all Im saying.

SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site?

..interesting.