Orion is in the Wrong Place!!! | |
| lasombra User ID: 2920692 12/06/2012 03:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Alright, first up, I shot this image of Orion and astrometrically solved it. The constellation's right where it should be relative to the surrounding stars. The annotations were automatically generated as a result of the astrometric solution. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to nova.astrometry.net] Figured so. Do have a question though... Obviously, the moon appears to rise in a different location (further to the south tonight). How much 'swing' is there each month? Be gentle Doc, astro-dummy here ;) I don't even know how to phrase the question correctly to google it. Thanks in advance! "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." Navajo Proverb |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 27749847 12/06/2012 03:52 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's been over an hour. Either the shit hit the fan or he fell asleep. Like I should be doing. Or, maybe he is on the phone with NASA. Got to get past pressing 1 a dozen times before you can choose English to proceed. Then there's a ton of red tape to fight your way through which sends you to the janitor. After you convince him he doesn't need to sweep away and hide any dirt, you get a security. need to convince him you arent on GLP by talking about the latest on Fox news, then you get a scientist. When you convince him you aren't asking about Nibiru he may answer. Quoting: Serendipitous These things take time. It's probably gonna take a while. When he makes a video, he spends a good amount of time on it. Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1642925 12/06/2012 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29187124 12/06/2012 03:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | screenshot of stellarium in my current position. and just like it should be, its very close to east (slightly north) you're gonna have to take my word for it, that i know which direction is east. now, stop being a bunch of gullible thickies already! [link to i50.tinypic.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1642925 12/06/2012 04:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9266723 12/06/2012 04:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28378701 12/06/2012 04:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Rayrayz User ID: 951476 12/06/2012 04:25 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7415550 12/06/2012 04:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29192474 12/06/2012 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Acula![]() Forum Moderator User ID: 17960 12/06/2012 05:06 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks the same as it always has. Still coming over the same hill at my house. Last 20 years Orion has been like clock work. The moon is normal too! Its a wet moon... The only thing odd i ever saw going on with orion was this... The top left shoulder is Betelgeuse... They say its going to go super nova... Anytime... From now to a million or so years... Well one night Betelgeuse was gone... Not there... I was like "wtf?!" Did it go nova? Is it on vacation? Someone forgot to change its light bulb? It was fucking gone!!! The i realized the problem... I was drunk as hell and wasnt even looking at Orion! I was so eager to see weird shit, so willing to discover something afoul... In my drunkness i didnt think... I didnt stop and act logical... I assumed that a star disappeared... In my drunken ignorance i didnt stop and realize i didnt have a clue as to what i was looking at... I was just glad i was too drunk to walk... Or else i might have posted something silly online about it... I am a HelpTard, need Help? Ask me! Peace Means Reloading Your Guns! Some of my custom graphics are featured in the Official GLP Store: [link to www.cafepress.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29194312 12/06/2012 05:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's been over an hour. Either the shit hit the fan or he fell asleep. Like I should be doing. Or, maybe he is on the phone with NASA. Got to get past pressing 1 a dozen times before you can choose English to proceed. Then there's a ton of red tape to fight your way through which sends you to the janitor. After you convince him he doesn't need to sweep away and hide any dirt, you get a security. need to convince him you arent on GLP by talking about the latest on Fox news, then you get a scientist. When you convince him you aren't asking about Nibiru he may answer. Quoting: Serendipitous These things take time. It's probably gonna take a while. When he makes a video, he spends a good amount of time on it. Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. Interesting. Thanks for your info, looking forward to what you capture tonight (whether it be okay or not) ![]() |
| #Geomagnetic_Storm# "Official SunTard" User ID: 1426914 12/06/2012 05:09 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks the same as it always has. Still coming over the same hill at my house. Last 20 years Orion has been like clock work. Quoting: Dr. Acula The moon is normal too! Its a wet moon... The only thing odd i ever saw going on with orion was this... The top left shoulder is Betelgeuse... They say its going to go super nova... Anytime... From now to a million or so years... Well one night Betelgeuse was gone... Not there... I was like "wtf?!" Did it go nova? Is it on vacation? Someone forgot to change its light bulb? It was fucking gone!!! The i realized the problem... I was drunk as hell and wasnt even looking at Orion! I was so eager to see weird shit, so willing to discover something afoul... In my drunkness i didnt think... I didnt stop and act logical... I assumed that a star disappeared... In my drunken ignorance i didnt stop and realize i didnt have a clue as to what i was looking at... I was just glad i was too drunk to walk... Or else i might have posted something silly online about it... ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 8989938 12/06/2012 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| WeAreOne Free Thinker User ID: 29122566 12/06/2012 05:35 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. Thank you! Be the change you want the World to be. Be someone that makes you happy. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23933640 12/06/2012 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's been over an hour. Either the shit hit the fan or he fell asleep. Like I should be doing. Or, maybe he is on the phone with NASA. Got to get past pressing 1 a dozen times before you can choose English to proceed. Then there's a ton of red tape to fight your way through which sends you to the janitor. After you convince him he doesn't need to sweep away and hide any dirt, you get a security. need to convince him you arent on GLP by talking about the latest on Fox news, then you get a scientist. When you convince him you aren't asking about Nibiru he may answer. Quoting: Serendipitous These things take time. It's probably gonna take a while. When he makes a video, he spends a good amount of time on it. Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. It's been over an hour. Either the shit hit the fan or he fell asleep. Like I should be doing. Or, maybe he is on the phone with NASA. Got to get past pressing 1 a dozen times before you can choose English to proceed. Then there's a ton of red tape to fight your way through which sends you to the janitor. After you convince him he doesn't need to sweep away and hide any dirt, you get a security. need to convince him you arent on GLP by talking about the latest on Fox news, then you get a scientist. When you convince him you aren't asking about Nibiru he may answer. Quoting: Serendipitous These things take time. It's probably gonna take a while. When he makes a video, he spends a good amount of time on it. Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. Things that make you say - hummm Thank space dog |
| DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 12/06/2012 05:57 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ![]() Just Sayin... look @ this: Thread: Upside down moon is really a alien mothership. Thread: ~ MOON TILT 90 DEGREES IN 8 HOURS-? ~ Thread: ???? Anyone notice the UPSIDE DOWN MOON last night ????? Thread: With which foot did N. Armstrong first step onto the moon his right or his left? Thread: Crepuscular Light Duration Has Changed Thread: Venus and Jupiter Conjuntion Rates Disinfo |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15439666 12/06/2012 05:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey!, That's Beatty,Nevada. Bunch of kookie old folks live out there.However i don't think he's lying maybe we are in a weird un-uniform type of wobble spin and the Earth keeps trying to correct herself so somtimes she aligns and other times she slips and this causes all this weird earthquakes,weather,and star misalignments.Maybe. |
| Raymantheheretic User ID: 25274207 12/06/2012 06:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just to be clear trailer dude doesn't say Orion has moved relative to the position of other stars but in relation to where he is used to seeing it from his particular vantage point. |
| DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 12/06/2012 06:23 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | However the guy seems telling the true, however he forgot to say that he always saw Orion rising on that place in that winter season this because it can moves a bit due to earth's axis inclination (not because everyday shilltards field rotation BS). You know, even the sun change up to 15 degrees from East to South in winter time (rise) and up to 15 degrees from West to North in Summer time (set). Anyway the sideway moon is a fact and its not normal at all. - Last Edited by DVCMCM on 12/06/2012 07:24 AM Just Sayin... look @ this: Thread: Upside down moon is really a alien mothership. Thread: ~ MOON TILT 90 DEGREES IN 8 HOURS-? ~ Thread: ???? Anyone notice the UPSIDE DOWN MOON last night ????? Thread: With which foot did N. Armstrong first step onto the moon his right or his left? Thread: Crepuscular Light Duration Has Changed Thread: Venus and Jupiter Conjuntion Rates Disinfo |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1408355 12/06/2012 06:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| BringOnTheDoom User ID: 22765188 12/06/2012 06:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28658457 12/06/2012 06:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27504274 12/06/2012 06:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As the trolls say...not sure if serious. Not to the man...but to the GLP attention. This must be a controlled burn. Expose it...shill it/deal with it...move on. Sorta like a TEE S making a white sun page on the front page. Who cares about Orion being out of place when the damn moon hasnt been right in over a year? Ya know for the bible to be such supposed bs it sure is funny its the only thing out there telling us there would be signs in the sun (white super bright sun)...moon (gone for over a week at a time) and stars (strange stars and now orion) in the end times/last days. The shills hold tight to this because they got everything riding on this. Oh how they have played this disguised game for so long. Well time is almost up and they arent gonna have to play your internet buddies much longer. Soon the true them will come out and when that happens its gonna be too late for the un believers in the lord and the skeptics. |
| THE BAT User ID: 29196967 12/06/2012 06:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ya know there could be other reasons for the displacement of celestial bodies , and anomalies (such as vortex clouds) in our skies. Holograms!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Years ago, during a penumbral eclipse of the moon, (whereas the moon turned red)most of the United States saw the full eclipse; whereas in Liberty, Ky, it never happened, the moon never eclipsed , though you could see the shadow of the eclipse behind it. It's been talked about, for many years, by rogue "insiders", that our military (deep black operations), had such technology, using chemtrails to create a reflective matter within our atmosphere, to literally create a projection screen of our atmosphere, to produce holograms. Could the weird anomalies, that others and myself in the past have witnessed, be the workings of holograms? The night of the eclipse, I spoke to people all over the U.S.A., confirming the eclipse was happening, I could see the eclipse shadow, but the moon never eclipsed in Liberty, Ky. The eclipse I'm referring to happened in the Fall of 2004 or 2005. So the real question here, is..........Are they using holograms in our atmosphere, of our night skies? If so why? And also if so, lol, WHAT ARE THEY HIDING FROM US?????????????? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23660254 12/06/2012 06:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's been over an hour. Either the shit hit the fan or he fell asleep. Like I should be doing. Or, maybe he is on the phone with NASA. Got to get past pressing 1 a dozen times before you can choose English to proceed. Then there's a ton of red tape to fight your way through which sends you to the janitor. After you convince him he doesn't need to sweep away and hide any dirt, you get a security. need to convince him you arent on GLP by talking about the latest on Fox news, then you get a scientist. When you convince him you aren't asking about Nibiru he may answer. Quoting: Serendipitous These things take time. It's probably gonna take a while. When he makes a video, he spends a good amount of time on it. Not making a video. Somethings not adding up on the axial rotation measurement (and you all thought I was a "shill" - I'm honest, even when it's very likely nothing at all). Tonight I took a shortcut and just used my SLR with telephoto lens on a tripod rather than hauling out the whole telescope. I also only had a few minutes of a gap between clouds and then it was clouded up completely. But something about this picture I took isn't adding up... [link to i319.photobucket.com] I'm consistently coming back to a distance of about 35 arcminutes for Polaris from the north celestial pole. That ain't right. It should be just shy of 41 arcminutes. Now, I've never calibrated this lens astrometrically before tonight, but I used the Polaris image itself as well as an earlier image I shot a few months back and they both resulted in about the same image scale of about 8.2 arcseconds per pixel at the resolution I'm using for analysis. Maybe I screwed my math up somewhere along the way, I'm running on very little sleep and I need to get some now if I'm every going to. For the sake of sanity in the thread and so that people don't start killing themselves before I can solve this mystery, I've never tried to use my SLR camera by itself for this particular measurement before (I've always used my telescopes with the SLR catching the light at prime focus) and the 300mm telephoto lens I have is rather heavy. I'm thinking something settled or flexed on my camera tripod over the 8 minute exposure, causing the star trails to be artificially shifted by about 6 arcminutes (and for what it's worth, that's a small angle, one fifth the diameter of the moon's disc, it's not something Bubba in his trailer is going to notice just by casually looking and comparing by eye to a mountain range). The telescopes I normally use are much beefier and sturdier. I'll repeat the measurement telescopically tomorrow. If telescopic measurement confirms it... I'll probably take a sniper bullet in the head because there's no way that kind of change could be kept secret without a mass assassination of every person like me. uh oh, don't usually pay much attention to these types of posts...but this guy is good. I shall be awaiting his next response...Thanks doc |
| DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 12/06/2012 06:38 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | uh oh, don't usually pay much attention to these types of posts...but this guy is good. I shall be awaiting his next response...Thanks doc Quoting: exiled1 ![]() Just Sayin... look @ this: Thread: Upside down moon is really a alien mothership. Thread: ~ MOON TILT 90 DEGREES IN 8 HOURS-? ~ Thread: ???? Anyone notice the UPSIDE DOWN MOON last night ????? Thread: With which foot did N. Armstrong first step onto the moon his right or his left? Thread: Crepuscular Light Duration Has Changed Thread: Venus and Jupiter Conjuntion Rates Disinfo |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23660254 12/06/2012 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23660254 12/06/2012 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 12/06/2012 06:41 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry but to me is a big ignorant in astronomy (or a shill even a troll posting the same crap). Just Sayin... look @ this: Thread: Upside down moon is really a alien mothership. Thread: ~ MOON TILT 90 DEGREES IN 8 HOURS-? ~ Thread: ???? Anyone notice the UPSIDE DOWN MOON last night ????? Thread: With which foot did N. Armstrong first step onto the moon his right or his left? Thread: Crepuscular Light Duration Has Changed Thread: Venus and Jupiter Conjuntion Rates Disinfo |