Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*

take a nap dude

you have a long night ahead of you

Actually I believe the declination should be 89d 19' due to precession, not 89d 18', but either way I'm still looking at a measurement last night that just isn't right. All previous measurements were accurate to arcsecond resolution, but were made telescopically.

Yeah, so maybe in a year or so from now we may have "an official" confirmation to this, right? =D

Just see what happened with 9/11: After thorough examinations, Niels Harrit et al published a peer reviewed article of remains of explosives found in the dust of the WTC towers. The result: everyone involved in publishing the study got mocked, the chief editor of the magazine had to resign, and the "official truth" about the thing still hasn't changed after many years.

The so called "scientific consensus" is a travesty in itself. Science should always be open to new ideas and observations, including ones that may appear wacky to begin with. But alas, "science" has by and large taken the place of religion and become a force of repression rather than emancipation.

Fortunately, that's not the whole picture. But still, waiting for mainstream "science" and/or media to take seriously anything considered to be "impossible", you may have to wait forever.

Hey Astro,

You said that Orion was where it was supposed to be yet Polaris may not be... If the earths axial rotation was off, wouldn't all the constellations have measurement anomalies as well?

Obviously I'm no astronomer and there very well may be a good explanation for this, so looking forward to seeing what you come up with tonight.
Hopefully you get good weather this evening.

If I went and got a telescope, how hard would it be for a beginner to take these measurements themselves?

Respect! Nice bike the Multistrada as well.

Thank You For Your Appreciation!

Astro, you should just stop posting until Dec 22 :p Can you imagine how much crazier this place would be if people DID think you were assassinated for finding this out?

Sorry for the confusion; Orion was where it should be relative to the surrounding stars. If my initial measurement of this anomaly is correct then Orion would be off from the axis of rotation by 6 arcminutes as well.

There's a damn good explanation for it, Planet X, just wait until he finds it :)

Let me predict his answer: Its because Field Rotation, Period.

(not).



FAIL


-

Last Edited by DVCMCM on 12/06/2012 09:38 AM

If you call that anomaly i don't know what you'll call what's coming up.

The movie Brave was the most obvious concerning Polaris. If one sees only the "real" described by left-hemisphere linguistics and visible light worship, it can't and won't be seen even when it's right in front of you.

!!!!! yea me too!!!!!

Oh no. Do not mention that. Let's stick to science, please.

IF Astro is right there wont be next generation to remember it

the only survivors (high mountains) will have more serious
things to think than to remember some Astro from some Usa(if still exists)and If we suppose the survivor was a glper :)

better pray (if you believe in god) or hope (if you are not)
that Astro was not in a good day and has make a little
calculation wrong, and if we consider that this have happent in very short time (just noticed), then...

The Hell Of a Ride have begin.

Thank you Astromut. I haven't a clue as to what the meaning of your observation is, but I appreciate your thoroughness and honesty.

to check on the update

Just wait and see ;)

I believe that the pole star is not always constant. In other words, it changes and perhaps we are getting a new one. But we may have to re-incarnate to see it.

I won't be seeing it from earth because i don't plan on re-incarnating here ever again if possible. We have not seen anything yet.

Last Edited by duncog2012 on 12/06/2012 09:41 AM

Not at all, hes never right.

Last Edited by DVCMCM on 12/06/2012 09:42 AM

Have you watched that goofball's video in the Orion thread? Just eyeballing it, does where he says it moved too relative to the anomaly you have found thus far?

Of course Orion did not move, if anything, all constellations would be off because we moved.

Well, then can someone tell me what's the big deal IF the earth's rotation is off by 6 arcminutes?

Me either what does this actually mean if there really is an anomaly?

Me either what does this actually mean if there really is an anomaly?

What are the real implications of a 6 arcminute move in a short time?

If measurements in a week shown "9" arcminutes, etc. then we can begin to get a handle on how fast this is happening and whether it is accelerating as it goes...


Soon the mainstream would have to pick it up because the outside visuals would be undeniable at some point.

???

hahaha, not if they start spraying even more chemtrails...nothing to see here folks (wink)

Last Edited by Nexus-9 on 12/06/2012 09:45 AM

Nothing so big. Anyway that its not the point.

Hi Rev!!!

This could be getting real.