Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved* | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28959013 Canada 12/06/2012 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Astro is still up and would guess pouring over the data, looking for the source of the error. Did it ever get checked, the theard where an unidentified object was near Leonis.? Switch and bait? Distraction? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26202851 United States 12/06/2012 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25878729 Germany 12/06/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27302733 United States 12/06/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I checked and this amounts to 0.1 of a degree. Which seems insignficant, but on the other hand, perhaps something is causing it, but it seems minor. Quoting: Sungaze_At_Dawn If it was another body causing it, it would mean it would continually increase. If it was solar, it would mean it would continually increase. If it was galactical, it would mean it would continually increase. If it was core-related, it would mean it would continually increase. I can't think of anything that would cause this (assuming it's even true), that would mean this would stop or revert. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29204499 United Kingdom 12/06/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 Italy 12/06/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | (cutting off the fail) Quoting: Dr. Astro If my initial measurement of this anomaly is correct then Orion would be off from the axis of rotation by 6 arcminutes as well. ..... and now how you did calculate the variation of 6 arcminutes? - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/06/2012 10:13 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28832234 Canada 12/06/2012 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know, if your calculations prove correct, you might write up an article and submit it for peer review to a scientific journal. Quoting: Nexus-9 Yeah, so maybe in a year or so from now we may have "an official" confirmation to this, right? =D Just see what happened with 9/11: After thorough examinations, Niels Harrit et al published a peer reviewed article of remains of explosives found in the dust of the WTC towers. The result: everyone involved in publishing the study got mocked, the chief editor of the magazine had to resign, and the "official truth" about the thing still hasn't changed after many years. The so called "scientific consensus" is a travesty in itself. Science should always be open to new ideas and observations, including ones that may appear wacky to begin with. But alas, "science" has by and large taken the place of religion and become a force of repression rather than emancipation. Fortunately, that's not the whole picture. But still, waiting for mainstream "science" and/or media to take seriously anything considered to be "impossible", you may have to wait forever. I love intellectual folks who actually know what they are talking about. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24127047 United States 12/06/2012 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You mention the hypothetical , tongue-in-cheek assassination of other astronomers discovering something "they" don't want discovered and announced. Is this something that is always or normally being monitored by others, most specifically amateurs (not professionally paid NASA employees)? I'm just wondering if it's a measurement that is just typically taken for granted and not really checked on outside of circles like ours where celestial objects are regularly accused of not being where they should. Would others have noticed this or be looking for it? Quoting: Gratia Plena They would notice it, even if they weren't deliberately looking for it. For instance, some amateurs polar aligned their telescopes using an iterative method that requires Polaris to be at the expected offset from the north celestial pole. Other amateurs also have permanently polar aligned telescopes. These guys would start to notice that their polar alignments are no longer as accurate as they should be, resulting in a drift in declination during long exposure astrophotography. Astro, How long before you are able to confirm your findings. Also, can you explain what may happen in laymans terms? I will try to check again tonight if the clouds part ways. Thanks, hopefully you will be able to repeat your test. Are you willing to comment on what could or could not be happening and perhaps the cause? Do you have an opinion on this? Also, Astro, why were you measuring in the first place. Do you suspect something is going on? I've always enjoyed your honest posts and appreciate your insight. |
DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 Italy 12/06/2012 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lime Flavoured Redux User ID: 7983171 United Kingdom 12/06/2012 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24127047 United States 12/06/2012 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF User ID: 381742 United States 12/06/2012 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | (cutting off the fail) Quoting: Dr. Astro If my initial measurement of this anomaly is correct then Orion would be off from the axis of rotation by 6 arcminutes as well. ..... and now how you calculate the variation of 6 arcminutes? With an arc stopwatch of course ;) I never forgive and I never forget I am a licensed firearm holder. I will, under protection of law, use lethal force if attacked. |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/06/2012 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You mention the hypothetical , tongue-in-cheek assassination of other astronomers discovering something "they" don't want discovered and announced. Is this something that is always or normally being monitored by others, most specifically amateurs (not professionally paid NASA employees)? I'm just wondering if it's a measurement that is just typically taken for granted and not really checked on outside of circles like ours where celestial objects are regularly accused of not being where they should. Would others have noticed this or be looking for it? Quoting: Gratia Plena They would notice it, even if they weren't deliberately looking for it. For instance, some amateurs polar aligned their telescopes using an iterative method that requires Polaris to be at the expected offset from the north celestial pole. Other amateurs also have permanently polar aligned telescopes. These guys would start to notice that their polar alignments are no longer as accurate as they should be, resulting in a drift in declination during long exposure astrophotography. Has anyone else then posted similar info recently? There should be other reliable sources also. This shouldn't go unnoticed very long. I haven't heard any horror stories or strange reports from my fellow amateurs. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1290427 United Kingdom 12/06/2012 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 Italy 12/06/2012 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | (cutting off the fail) Quoting: Dr. Astro If my initial measurement of this anomaly is correct then Orion would be off from the axis of rotation by 6 arcminutes as well. ..... and now how you calculate the variation of 6 arcminutes? With an arc stopwatch of course ;) Oh, right. My fail... Tnx Brief. |
DUCM900 User ID: 29195128 Italy 12/06/2012 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CalmShock User ID: 5056346 Canada 12/06/2012 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When was the last time you checked the measurement and it was correct? If Polaris actually IS 6 arcminutes off, then you could roughly guesstimate how the time it took. Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |
CalmShock User ID: 5056346 Canada 12/06/2012 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | damn double post... Last Edited by CalmShock on 12/06/2012 10:16 AM Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1667343 United States 12/06/2012 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astro you may find that the magnetic poles are shifting at a dramatic rate, and possibly the true north and south poles are shifting as well. Quoting: Jesus/Yahshua is Lord! Amen! 25746694 Matthew 24 Mark 13 Luke 21 John Those who have ears to hear, listen the Word of is Holy and true. Jesus/Yahshua Christ is Lord and Savior. Get ready people, govt's, nations. God Almighty's words will not pass away till all things are fulfilled, may those who are lost will be found and those who saved, are Heavenly Father and Lord Jesus/Yahshua will give us strength in these times. God bless! I think astro might be too busy correlating facts too be looking up bible verses. So glad you chimed in to point out the relevant verses to save him looking thru a thousand pages of crap to support hos findings. He's talking abut the celestial poles, not magnetic... [link to en.wikipedia.org] Celestial poles would be like if you had a rod going through the center of the earth (which the earth rotated on... its 'axis' if you will), and it stuck out on either end, the end of the rod in the NORTH would be pointing to a patch of sky near Polaris. What Astro is saying is that the 'rod' is not pointing quite where it should be. Its off by a teeny tiny amount. "Axial Rotation" anomaly has little to nothing to do with magnetic poles. Very interesting Astro, thanks for posting! |
MuzzleBreak User ID: 29068467 United States 12/06/2012 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Assuming that Polaris is off by 6 degrees - what does that mean for us here on Earth in Layman's terms? Quoting: BadMoonRising 4583236 Thanks It means it's off by 6 degrees. Earth tilt? 6 arc minutes in one tenth of one degree, not 6 degrees. In his book, "Between Two Ages," Brzezinski wrote: "The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values." MuzzleBreak |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 12/06/2012 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gee, lets see... This video was uploaded September 25th The TITLE says it all... Something I and several others have been saying for months now how more and more anomalies connected to SYMPTOMS of a POLE SHIFT would begin MANIFESTING around NOVEMBER/DECEMBER which would PERPLEX the world of Science Thread: Are these all connected???? And so with Astro's ANNOUNCEMENT that SUMTHIN AIN'T RIGHT in the STARS and EARTH's "AXIAL ROTATION" (which can easily be associated with such "symptoms"), we enter into what may be the FIRST STAGES of science OFFICIALLY having to confront and CONSIDER the real possibility of what the 188 LEY LINES & QUAKE CYCLE in the above video (and other evidence presented from various sources), have already been warning about... a GEOLOGICAL POLE SHIFT in 2013 a notion which has been INCONCEIVABLE and ridiculed as even possible anytime soon, let alone in 2013! oh the irony of it all! |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 12/06/2012 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If this turns out to be a valid deviation... it stands to reason that it will increase in effect, as the previous poster stated. What's funny to me is the ill-mannered vehemence with which a great deal of these posters decried any anomalies in the past.. Ride 'em, cowboy... Yehaw... |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/06/2012 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When was the last time you checked the measurement and it was correct? Quoting: CalmShock If Polaris actually IS 6 arcminutes off, then you could roughly guesstimate how the time it took. Last time I checked was January, but something like this would not be able to remain hidden for long before amateurs would either find it and mention it, or entire astronomy neighborhoods get wiped out. Last I checked the guys at Arizona sky village and chiefland astronomy village didn't all suddenly drop dead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246336 United States 12/06/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sword of mercy User ID: 5993982 United Kingdom 12/06/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey Astro, Quoting: CalmShock You said that Orion was where it was supposed to be yet Polaris may not be... If the earths axial rotation was off, wouldn't all the constellations have measurement anomalies as well? Obviously I'm no astronomer and there very well may be a good explanation for this, so looking forward to seeing what you come up with tonight. Hopefully you get good weather this evening. If I went and got a telescope, how hard would it be for a beginner to take these measurements themselves? I believe that the pole star is not always constant. In other words, it changes and perhaps we are getting a new one. But we may have to re-incarnate to see it. I won't be seeing it from earth because i don't plan on re-incarnating here ever again if possible. We have not seen anything yet. Yeah,think before Polaris it was Thuban in the northern constellation Draco the Dragon. That was only a few thousand years ago and life went on doing its thing "Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy! " |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 23930358 United States 12/06/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maybe people are tired of the public stroking Astro gets every time he posts something? You all don't have a clue who "Dr" Astro is, or many of the other "people" found here on GLP....fact is you're all in for a rude awakening Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26202851 So ... please do enlighten us ........... Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1342995 United States 12/06/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27302733 United States 12/06/2012 10:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27302733 Yeah, and all of the pairs and teams dying off together with their research destroyed or missing is just a coincidence....try again I don't know. An explanation wasn't in that video either. But, I've had to destroy or have destroyed all kinds of material at places I've worked as well. There's no telling what type of information a professional may have that could be damaging to national security. If you die,resign, fail a personality check, whatever... and you have mappings for satellites, for example, your stuff is going to get confiscated or destroyed. But, the point still remains, most of them died YEARS apart, and the average age was like 70 years old..which is pretty 'normal' I was just saying a bunch of deaths spanned that far apart and with that average age doesn't mean anything. The same video could be made for a group of retail workers, factory workers, insurance salesman...just because the people happen to have a more exciting job, doesn't make it deviant. |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/06/2012 10:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 247684 United States 12/06/2012 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |