Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,546 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 79,699
Pageviews Today: 162,099Threads Today: 92Posts Today: 1,306
01:46 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14602460
United States
12/07/2012 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


spock

^^^^^^^
Kinda like that guy, but with slightly less a sense of humor ;)

Very knowledgeable
 Quoting: PolarBear418


Thanks
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14602460
United States
12/07/2012 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


Yes, he is usually the first to straighten out erroneous posts about space. I have NEVER seen him post an irregularity like this before!!!
 Quoting: Ozicell


Really?
Thanks
Rayrayz

User ID: 951476
United States
12/07/2012 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


spock

^^^^^^^
Kinda like that guy, but with slightly less a sense of humor ;)

Very knowledgeable
 Quoting: PolarBear418


He has a sense of humor...It's a dry wit.
Wheatie
User ID: 28624835
United States
12/07/2012 02:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


Yes. He's usually the one debunking bs threads.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14602460
United States
12/07/2012 02:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


he's called a shill for telling the truth most of the time...

he's no nonsense and his posts are as good as any valid source out there...

he spends time proving the insane to be... the insane...

if he says something is fucked up...

then you can bet... its fucked up...

very very very credible
 Quoting: Dr. Acula



Wow . . . thanks for the info . . . really interested now to know what he's going to post.
ScrumpTheTexanModerator
Forum Administrator

User ID: 3974719
United States
12/07/2012 02:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
popcorn
I am a Christian.

Christian does not equal doormat or pushover

"I Have Sworn upon the Altar of God... Eternal Hostility against every form of Tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson, Sep. 23, 1800

MedinaD

The Election of Donald John Trump: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

For previous Newsletters, click 'Scrump's News Letters' @ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Reality420
User ID: 24847476
United States
12/07/2012 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460



[joking]No, he's barking mad. Everyone knows that.[/joking]

Yes he's generally known for being thorough and accurate and sane... however after this I'm beginning to question the last attribute...


R.
UnmannedAerialPilot

User ID: 27573455
United States
12/07/2012 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
...about that sniper...
Dr. AculaModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 61633
United States
12/07/2012 02:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
...about that sniper...
 Quoting: UnmannedAerialPilot


ahhh
_______________________

drbat
Devoted Follower
User ID: 28055738
United States
12/07/2012 02:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Isaiah 24:20
The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall , and not rise again .

hiding
emerald_glow

User ID: 924761
United States
12/07/2012 02:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


he's called a shill for telling the truth most of the time...

he's no nonsense and his posts are as good as any valid source out there...

he spends time proving the insane to be... the insane...

if he says something is fucked up...

then you can bet... its fucked up...

very very very credible
 Quoting: Dr. Acula


Are you wagging your tail, too, while saying all this?
Emerald_Glow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18980766
Australia
12/07/2012 02:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


he's called a shill for telling the truth most of the time...

he's no nonsense and his posts are as good as any valid source out there...

he spends time proving the insane to be... the insane...

if he says something is fucked up...

then you can bet... its fucked up...

very very very credible
 Quoting: Dr. Acula


Are you wagging your tail, too, while saying all this?
 Quoting: emerald_glow


Well said! The egos in here are hilarious.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25512421
United States
12/07/2012 02:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It's been over an hour since he started the measurement and still no findings. I guess he's being thorough.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8640456
United States
12/07/2012 02:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Isaiah 24:20
The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall , and not rise again .

hiding
 Quoting: Devoted Follower 28055738


The commentary of that verse says:

and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; that is, the punishment of transgression, which, like a talent of lead, in Zechariah 5:8 shall crush it, and the inhabitants of it, to pieces:

and it shall fall, and not rise again; in the form it now is; for there will be new heavens and a new earth, in which the righteous, who will share the first resurrection, will dwell; for as for the first earth, or present one, it shall pass away, and no place be found for it, Revelation 20:11.
Dr. AculaModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 61633
United States
12/07/2012 02:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


he's called a shill for telling the truth most of the time...

he's no nonsense and his posts are as good as any valid source out there...

he spends time proving the insane to be... the insane...

if he says something is fucked up...

then you can bet... its fucked up...

very very very credible
 Quoting: Dr. Acula


Are you wagging your tail, too, while saying all this?
 Quoting: emerald_glow


no.

Astro and I just recently "debated" on another topic.

He was rather sharp toned with me... and I to him...

So im not his cheerleader... but truth is truth.

Astro is not one for trolling or crazy ass follies
_______________________

drbat
Éireann

User ID: 29254047
United States
12/07/2012 02:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


Anyone?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14602460


Yes, he is usually the first to straighten out erroneous posts about space. I have NEVER seen him post an irregularity like this before!!!
 Quoting: Ozicell

bump
Eireann~

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20
InfiniteTopHat

User ID: 1723760
United States
12/07/2012 02:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
There are a lot of things Astro says that I don't like, but he's always got legitimate evidence and research to back him.

I'm waiting in anticipation of what he's found as well.
Dr. AstroModerator  (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 27749847
United States
12/07/2012 02:46 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It appears that all is right with the world. I found Polaris to be 835.7 pixels from the north celestial pole:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Previous astrometric calibration with this telescope and camera show that it has a resolution of 2.93 arcseconds per pixel:
[link to www.flickr.com]
Given that Polaris' declination after accounting for precession is 89d 19' 09.8", it should have been 2,450.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole. 835.7*2.93 = 2448.601 for a difference of 1.599, less than the resolution of this telescope/camera combo and meaning that the NCP was exactly where it should have been in the image (I used my widefield refractor; had I used the main telescope Polaris would have been outside of the field of view and I would have had to measure off something else, leaving a question as to whether or not Polaris itself had mysteriously warped somewhere else). Here's the raw photograph from which the measurements were made. I used PixInsight dynamic background subtraction in the above version to subtract out some of the light pollution:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]

Last Edited by Astromut on 12/07/2012 02:47 AM
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23727608
United States
12/07/2012 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It's been over an hour since he started the measurement and still no findings. I guess he's being thorough.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25512421


Or maybe he's hitting a crack pipe.
UnmannedAerialPilot

User ID: 27573455
United States
12/07/2012 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It appears that all is right with the world. I found Polaris to be 835.7 pixels from the north celestial pole:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Previous astrometric calibration with this telescope and camera show that it has a resolution of 2.93 arcseconds per pixel:
[link to www.flickr.com]
Given that Polaris' declination after accounting for precession is 89d 19' 09.8", it should have been 2,450.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole. 835.7*2.93 = 2448.601 for a difference of 1.599, less than the resolution of this telescope/camera combo and meaning that the NCP was exactly where it should have been in the image (I used my widefield refractor; had I used the main telescope Polaris would have been outside of the field of view and I would have had to measure off something else, leaving a question as to whether or not Polaris itself had mysteriously warped somewhere else). Here's the raw photograph from which the measurements were made. I used PixInsight dynamic background subtraction in the above version to subtract out some of the light pollution:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Thanks for the update, off to bed!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28618287
United States
12/07/2012 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
To quote Bender from Futurama - and .... we're..... boned!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20541213
United States
12/07/2012 02:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is prophecy coming true? A visionary died last year, Father
Gobbi of the Marian Movement of Priests. Father Iannuzzi's
comments. Father Iannuzzi is an American. Here is some wonderful news, a yes from the Vatican a few days ago, after Father Iannuzzi presented a study of the mystic Luisa Piccarreta's writings. The Heavenly messages controversial, misunderstood for years.

What I would like to know, I am a lay person, is a "pole
shift" the same as the earth being "knocked of its axis
?"

+ + +


From one of the very few theologians of eschatology (the last things), an exorcist who worked under Fr. Amorth, and the only Vatican approved theologian with permission to write on Luisa Piccarreta and her Divine Will writings (with the proper interpretation) while her cause is being studied in Rome.


A very touching tribute to Fr. Gobbi from Father Joseph Iannuzzi, an Official Exorcist - June 29th, 2011



"I, Rev. Joseph Leo Iannuzzi, affirm that Fr. Steffano Gobbi is and was a true locutionist and a messenger from Mary, who shared with us a timely instrument from the Mother of God who is calling me and you to prayer and fasting from the heart. Time is short...The great chastisement awaits the planet that will be knocked off of its axis and send us into a moment of global darkness and the awakening of consciences..Fr. Gobbi's messages presently bear the Church's official seal of approval, the "imprimatur" Thus he is ecclesiastically recognized. So, prepare yourselves with the weapons of the Brown Scapular, the Miraculous medal, the Benedictine medal, the prayers of the Most Holy Rosary, the Chaplet of Divine Mercy and the frequent reception of the Sacraments of Confession and Holy Communion. As God loves you, I love you, and love one another. Forgive one another form the heart. Nothing else really matters in this life."


In Domino.


Rev. Joseph Iannuzzi
Éireann

User ID: 29254047
United States
12/07/2012 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It appears that all is right with the world. I found Polaris to be 835.7 pixels from the north celestial pole:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Previous astrometric calibration with this telescope and camera show that it has a resolution of 2.93 arcseconds per pixel:
[link to www.flickr.com]
Given that Polaris' declination after accounting for precession is 89d 19' 09.8", it should have been 2,450.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole. 835.7*2.93 = 2448.601 for a difference of 1.599, less than the resolution of this telescope/camera combo and meaning that the NCP was exactly where it should have been in the image (I used my widefield refractor; had I used the main telescope Polaris would have been outside of the field of view and I would have had to measure off something else, leaving a question as to whether or not Polaris itself had mysteriously warped somewhere else). Here's the raw photograph from which the measurements were made. I used PixInsight dynamic background subtraction in the above version to subtract out some of the light pollution:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Thank you for letting us know that Polaris is still where it ought to be :D
Eireann~

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25720192
New Zealand
12/07/2012 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Is Dr. Astro a poster known for his thorough and accurate postings? I'm not familiar with his reputation here.
 Quoting: itsamadmadworld


He once had a good reputation for being a voice of reason.

Then he posted a misleading and alarmist thread based on a single dodgy unchecked measurment, using even more dodgy equipment.

Now his reputation is only slightly better than that of the other trolls here,



In short - you could say his reputation is currentley in the gutter..

..but he's still looking at the stars.



5a
Me1
User ID: 2615487
Canada
12/07/2012 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
I just thought of something way out there - what if the soloar system shifted
Dr. PhD
User ID: 23168991
United Kingdom
12/07/2012 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Cheers Astro - Which is pretty much what I said yesterday...

Good work non the less.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16553491
United States
12/07/2012 02:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
Thank God! Thanks Astro 8-)... for sleuthing this out for everyone.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29255064
United Arab Emirates
12/07/2012 02:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It appears that all is right with the world. I found Polaris to be 835.7 pixels from the north celestial pole:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Previous astrometric calibration with this telescope and camera show that it has a resolution of 2.93 arcseconds per pixel:
[link to www.flickr.com]
Given that Polaris' declination after accounting for precession is 89d 19' 09.8", it should have been 2,450.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole. 835.7*2.93 = 2448.601 for a difference of 1.599, less than the resolution of this telescope/camera combo and meaning that the NCP was exactly where it should have been in the image (I used my widefield refractor; had I used the main telescope Polaris would have been outside of the field of view and I would have had to measure off something else, leaving a question as to whether or not Polaris itself had mysteriously warped somewhere else). Here's the raw photograph from which the measurements were made. I used PixInsight dynamic background subtraction in the above version to subtract out some of the light pollution:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


In normal English for dummies, please...

grinning
Dr. AstroModerator  (OP)
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 27749847
United States
12/07/2012 02:51 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
It appears that all is right with the world. I found Polaris to be 835.7 pixels from the north celestial pole:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Previous astrometric calibration with this telescope and camera show that it has a resolution of 2.93 arcseconds per pixel:
[link to www.flickr.com]
Given that Polaris' declination after accounting for precession is 89d 19' 09.8", it should have been 2,450.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole. 835.7*2.93 = 2448.601 for a difference of 1.599, less than the resolution of this telescope/camera combo and meaning that the NCP was exactly where it should have been in the image (I used my widefield refractor; had I used the main telescope Polaris would have been outside of the field of view and I would have had to measure off something else, leaving a question as to whether or not Polaris itself had mysteriously warped somewhere else). Here's the raw photograph from which the measurements were made. I used PixInsight dynamic background subtraction in the above version to subtract out some of the light pollution:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


So the moral of the story, don't use a cheap camera tripod with a heavy SLR camera to try to accurately measure things astrometrically. It just doesn't work. Tonight I used the proper equipment, a Canon XTi SLR attached via t-threads to an Orion ST-80 refractor riding piggyback on a Meade 8" LX200 Classic, a very sturdy telescope fully capable of handling that kind of payload.
astrobanner2
doom caster
User ID: 25512421
United States
12/07/2012 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Axial rotation measurement anomaly *Update on pg 21 - Problem Solved*
But of course. Which puts new credibility to my doom in late 2085 theory. You doom meisters are looking for something that probably wont happen until after your dead or at least very, very old...sorry charlie(s)

Keep on keeping on with one eye to the sky. And I'm not saying personal doom wont happen before that, I'm talking about ELE pole shift type doom. Going to be plenty of trouble leading up to the end.





GLP