we're back to loser with the hard evidence thing.

BTW there's no hard evidence of life on other planets, that isn't proof that there isn't any.

Your abuse of the term evidence is a sign that you don't really inderstand the scientific method.

There is anectodal evidence and emprical evidence in lieu of hard evidence. Only a fool ignores the first two in pursuit of proof. Incidentally evidence is not proof.

Child or loser, certainly not a seasoned scientist.