Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,104 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,803,043
Pageviews Today: 2,357,263Threads Today: 493Posts Today: 10,206
05:53 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Pilot Speaks Out About Chemtrails And HAARP
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...

we're back to loser with the hard evidence thing.

BTW there's no hard evidence of life on other planets, that isn't proof that there isn't any.

Your abuse of the term evidence is a sign that you don't really inderstand the scientific method.

There is anectodal evidence and emprical evidence in lieu of hard evidence. Only a fool ignores the first two in pursuit of proof. Incidentally evidence is not proof.

Child or loser, certainly not a seasoned scientist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29271249


But no one claims as a FACT that there is or isn't life on other planets! You chemtards claim as fact, that the trails aren't contrails!

Can't you see the fucking difference?!

If you actually understood atmospheric science and aviation, ALL that you accept as any type of evidence that the trails are made of chemicals would immediately disappear.

No, I'm not a scientist. But. I do understand the science. Which is more than I can say for any chemtard.

Anyone who claims that "chemtrails persist, while contrails quickly dissipate" is an absolute moron. And that is the MAIN claim of chemtards.

You people are the definition of the word "loser".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25792038

I am a scientist. And I can assure you, as a scientist, I know how to stay on the fence about a subject that doesn't lend itself to absolute hard evidence and proof as you obviously can not.

Thank you for admitting you are not a scientist because your demands for evidence were an obvious giveaway that you do not even know the difference between evidence and proof.

Which leads us to believe you are a child AND a loser.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29271249


If you're a chemtard, there is no way you understand atmospheric science.

And if you understood science, you would know that it's far more likely that the trails are nothing more than contrails..,and there wouldn't BE a fence!

I'm not a scientist, but that doesn't mean I'm not educated in aviation and atmospheric science. I am...and you, obviously, are not.

And I fully understand the difference between evidence, and proof. Please tell me why you think I don't. Because nothing I have written even SUGGESTS such a thing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25792038

Dude, "chemtard" makes you a newbie child and "I'm not a scientist" makes you a newbie and/or a loser shill? Why do you guys keep validating my assessment that by using certain terminology you are one or the other or both?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News