Hawaii doctors finding uranium in people’s urine —

On a bright note...At least its not Plutonium...

A little bit like keeping the blood in your alcohol stream topped up!

A group of 2 dozen Big island residents, many wearing Hazmat type suits, dramatically urged the State Health Department (DOH) to stop being bystanders and become pro-active advocates of public health [...]

Jim Albertini, of Malu ‘Aina said “DOH action is needed to investigate what’s causing uranium showing up in Big island resident’s urine. Is it uranium weapons that have been fired at [the Pohakuloa Training Area] or something else? Three MDs and a Naturopathic doctor have patients who have tested high for uranium in urine, including levels exceeding three times the upper expected limit.” [...]

[link to malu-aina.org]

very simply, smart arse... all reactors have a unique signature, isotopes from a particular reactor all have their own footprint....

... repost:

OK... Every nuclear plant has a specific start/continuation/end date.... yes?

From deciphering the half life of any element detected (short-life), it is possible to deduce the source by nature of the dated material. Longer life material are harder to determine, however - use electrospectrometers and other tools, it is possible to work out the "other" elements collected in the sample. These 'elements' can be deduced to only come from a particular source/location/time in reference to the source.....



to put it in lay terms (which you seem to require) A BMW, Citroen, Mini and Mitzubishi are all vehicles right?... I can tell you from inspection which one comes from Japan....... ;)

very simply, smart arse... all reactors have a unique signature, isotopes from a particular reactor all have their own footprint....

... repost:

OK... Every nuclear plant has a specific start/continuation/end date.... yes?

From deciphering the half life of any element detected (short-life), it is possible to deduce the source by nature of the dated material. Longer life material are harder to determine, however - use electrospectrometers and other tools, it is possible to work out the "other" elements collected in the sample. These 'elements' can be deduced to only come from a particular source/location/time in reference to the source.....

do that.. and they will pinpoint the source....

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

there are so many different and canstantly decaying/changing isotopes, it is like a road map back to the point of origin.

to put it in lay terms (which you seem to require) A BMW, Citroen, Mini and Mitzubishi are all vehicles right?... I can tell you from inspection which one comes from Japan....... ;)

So, and where do you see the Fingerprinto
in this Report?

Do you checked that this claim is much older
than Fukushima, you Fool?

People like you turn around even the truth
when you need it!

so far...

and yes we know it was fukushima, why keep paddling in a puddle about it... they reported extensively about adding boron to the cattle feed there in the earlier days to soak up radiation to the milk supply, so this is extremely plausible....

Uranium fact(?) sheet

[link to www.google.com.au]

updates:

[link to honoluluweekly.com]
Honolulu weekly letter with links to articles. (purports DU may be the culprit)... however a study in 1999 denies the use of DU on the island.
[link to www.google.com.au]

Ocean still suffering from Fukushima fallout

Continuing leaks and contaminated sediment keep radiation levels high.

[...]

New data presented at a conference held on 12–13 November at the University of Tokyo show that levels of radioactivity in the sea around the plant remain stable, rather than falling as expected. Researchers believe that run-off from rivers, as well as continued leaks from the plant, may be partially to blame. But contaminated sediment and marine organisms also seem to be involved.

[...]

The Fukushima disaster caused by far the largest discharge of radioactivity into the ocean ever seen. A new model presented by scientists from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts estimates that 16.2 petabecquerels (1015 becquerels) of radioactive caesium leaked from the plant — roughly the same amount that went into the atmosphere.

[...] in the region of the ocean near the plant, levels of caesium-137 have remained fixed at around 1,000 becquerels, a relatively high level compared to the natural background. Similarly, levels of radioactive caesium in bottom-dwelling fish remain pretty much unchanged more than 18 months after the accident.

Researchers at the conference are convinced that something is preventing the radiation levels from dropping. “There must be a source,” says Scott Fowler, an oceanographer at Stony Brook University in New York.

In fact, a fresh analysis by oceanographer Jota Kanda at the Tokyo University of Marine Science [estimates] the plant itself is leaking around 0.3 terabecquerels [0.3 trillion becquerels] per month [...]

[link to www.nature.com]

[link to enenews.com]

Title: Tokyo Bay Contamination More Serious than Fukushima Offing
Source: NHK
Date Aired: Jan 15, 2012
Date Published: Nov 4, 2012
Translated by: guardianofmiyagi

[link to enenews.com]