Can a christian creationist please refute this?

why is that illogical,with much resources and considering the possible scarcity of animals,they would have procreate like crazy

and didnt noah lived a long long time,and even his children...

so i guess a rabbit living for lets say 50 years or more can make plenty of new growth xD

there is nothing and i really mean nothing that can stand against the case of loving and merciful God

when you really contemplate it,there would be no us if there werent no flood,the cancer would have ate it all

sry didnt watch the video since i saw all of their arguments and they bore me

but the most fun thing is,and the most sad...

how can you even say that it is possible,i mean evolution,it is literally insane,deluded

there is birds,dinosaurs,and all kinds of animals in fossil records...however there are no half birds,there are no evolving organs or forms,nothing,zero

all you have is life forms that look connected,

how the fuck they jump from bacteria to trilobyte i dont understand...

All dogs from the wolf we all agree. Genetic switching stops at the Genus: Canis.

Did God Create Poodles?
[link to creation.com]


Genetic switching
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]




The Origins of Variety
Professor Walter Veith

[link to www.youtube.com]




Genetics: no friend of evolution
A highly qualified biologist tells it like it is.
by Lane Lester

Genetics and evolution have been enemies from the beginning of both concepts. Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics, and Charles Darwin, the father of modern evolution, were contemporaries. At the same time that Darwin was claiming that creatures could change into other creatures, Mendel was showing that even individual characteristics remain constant. While Darwin’s ideas were based on erroneous and untested ideas about inheritance, Mendel’s conclusions were based on careful experimentation. Only by ignoring the total implications of modern genetics has it been possible to maintain the fiction of evolution.
[link to creation.com]

I'm thinking that the reason the athiest vids I posted are bunk is because:

1. There weren't millions of species at the time of the flood. Just thousands that didn't become millions until after

2. The thousands had far more perfect DNA than the species of today, and therefore were immune to the bottle neck problem that would hinder modern species which contain for less genetic information and far more genetic damage to their chromozomes

3. The earth expanded from a much smaller world into a much larger one during the flood, or soon after (see expansion earth vids on youtube) thus separating the species after

Even today, you can still breed a llama to a camel even though they originated on two seperate continents divided by oceans. The only way this could happen is if they both came from a near common ancestor not many generations ago.

in 1994 in Turkey they found the oldest archeological site on the planet. The stones are covered with the carvings of strange animals.

Genesis 8:20 says that after noah came out of the ark, he built an alter to the lord. Could this be that alter?

Refute

actually ive read that human sacrifice is depicted and there is a story on those stones

i wouldnt say noah but i would say the world was different

the stones tell story how mankind fell

amazing things u connect there

but since there was better genetic purity and degeneration was not yet introduced,

think about how much healthy pups would you get from a dog,and they would make new ones in a year...

that is pretty fast growing community