Swedish official admits toxic 'chemtrails' are real, not a wild conspiracy theory | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29248098 United States 12/06/2012 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 28308154 Canada 12/07/2012 02:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29206319 United States 12/07/2012 02:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What, 3 hours and shills? Normal contrails, which are composed of mere water vapor that quickly dissipates after emission from jet engines, are far different from chemtrails, which gradually blanket the entire sky in a sea of white. The following video, put together by the FreeTruth Show, a YouTube-based radio broadcast, contains some imagery of what these chemtrails typically look like in the sky: [link to www.youtube.com] Learn more: [link to www.naturalnews.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29206319 United States 12/07/2012 02:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 12/07/2012 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29268725 United States 12/07/2012 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29265117 Germany 12/07/2012 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 12/07/2012 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29265117 Germany 12/07/2012 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro User ID: 29143420 United States 12/07/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29268725 United States 12/07/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29268725 United States 12/08/2012 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/08/2012 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 12/08/2012 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/08/2012 11:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] Yeah, according to Hagberg....who is just another chemtard, with no inside information, who makes stupid assumptions based on paranoid ignorance...blah blah blah... |
Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 29416253 Canada 12/09/2012 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] Yeah, according to Hagberg....who is just another chemtard, with no inside information, who makes stupid assumptions based on paranoid ignorance...blah blah blah... i love how the arguments are always "it's not true because it's not true!" --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
CeeLite User ID: 1482671 United States 12/13/2012 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1611462 United States 12/13/2012 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] Good link. Bringing it to the attention of a country. Up front and out there. Big beginning. Thanks, again OP. |
Small Family Farmer User ID: 14191796 United States 12/14/2012 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To all of you who think chemtrails are just fragments of "tin foil cap" loonies, please explain this to me. I live in a very rural area. Since 97 I've watched planes emit trails of material that you claim are simply normal engine emissions. The planes that flew over my farm were flying at such a high elevations that I couldn't clearly see where the emissions came out on the plane. So for years I couldn't say for a fact that what I was seeing wasn't some form of atmospheric pollution as a result of reformulated jet fuel. Last week one of those planes flew at a low enough elevation that I could see where the trails were coming from. Imagine my surprise when I saw the emissions were coming out of the tail fins rather than the engines on the wings. Unless these planes are designed to route engine emissions through the fuselage and out vents on the tail fins then what is coming out of those planes has nothing to do with engine emissions. PERIOD. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/14/2012 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as "chemtrails." Quoting: Mordier L'eft According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this "dangerous" mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. [link to www.naturalnews.com] Yeah, according to Hagberg....who is just another chemtard, with no inside information, who makes stupid assumptions based on paranoid ignorance...blah blah blah... i love how the arguments are always "it's not true because it's not true!" No, that's not why it's not true...it's not true because of the complete lack of evidence. But go ahead...pretend assumption and speculation is good enough...and that you aren't a scumbag for accusing others of wrongdoing based on your ignorance. It's your fucking fantasy... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/14/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To all of you who think chemtrails are just fragments of "tin foil cap" loonies, please explain this to me. Quoting: Small Family Farmer 14191796 I live in a very rural area. Since 97 I've watched planes emit trails of material that you claim are simply normal engine emissions. The planes that flew over my farm were flying at such a high elevations that I couldn't clearly see where the emissions came out on the plane. So for years I couldn't say for a fact that what I was seeing wasn't some form of atmospheric pollution as a result of reformulated jet fuel. Last week one of those planes flew at a low enough elevation that I could see where the trails were coming from. Imagine my surprise when I saw the emissions were coming out of the tail fins rather than the engines on the wings. Unless these planes are designed to route engine emissions through the fuselage and out vents on the tail fins then what is coming out of those planes has nothing to do with engine emissions. PERIOD. Nope...it's because of the air temperature. If its colder, the vapor freezes immediately...if slightly warmer, it takes a split second to freeze...so it looks like it's coming from the tail, but it's still coming from the engines. Your ignorance is showing... |
Mordier L'eft (OP) User ID: 29792223 Canada 12/14/2012 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To all of you who think chemtrails are just fragments of "tin foil cap" loonies, please explain this to me. Quoting: Small Family Farmer 14191796 I live in a very rural area. Since 97 I've watched planes emit trails of material that you claim are simply normal engine emissions. The planes that flew over my farm were flying at such a high elevations that I couldn't clearly see where the emissions came out on the plane. So for years I couldn't say for a fact that what I was seeing wasn't some form of atmospheric pollution as a result of reformulated jet fuel. Last week one of those planes flew at a low enough elevation that I could see where the trails were coming from. Imagine my surprise when I saw the emissions were coming out of the tail fins rather than the engines on the wings. Unless these planes are designed to route engine emissions through the fuselage and out vents on the tail fins then what is coming out of those planes has nothing to do with engine emissions. PERIOD. Nope...it's because of the air temperature. If its colder, the vapor freezes immediately...if slightly warmer, it takes a split second to freeze...so it looks like it's coming from the tail, but it's still coming from the engines. Your ignorance is showing... how, then, to explain the incidents of one plane leaving a chem-trail while being followed a short distance behind by a plane leaving a CON-trail? you would like me to explain how i know the difference, but you don't believe that there is a difference. so it will have to suffice to say that, yes, there is one, and many of us can see it plain as day. --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24394728 Austria 12/14/2012 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/14/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To all of you who think chemtrails are just fragments of "tin foil cap" loonies, please explain this to me. Quoting: Small Family Farmer 14191796 I live in a very rural area. Since 97 I've watched planes emit trails of material that you claim are simply normal engine emissions. The planes that flew over my farm were flying at such a high elevations that I couldn't clearly see where the emissions came out on the plane. So for years I couldn't say for a fact that what I was seeing wasn't some form of atmospheric pollution as a result of reformulated jet fuel. Last week one of those planes flew at a low enough elevation that I could see where the trails were coming from. Imagine my surprise when I saw the emissions were coming out of the tail fins rather than the engines on the wings. Unless these planes are designed to route engine emissions through the fuselage and out vents on the tail fins then what is coming out of those planes has nothing to do with engine emissions. PERIOD. Nope...it's because of the air temperature. If its colder, the vapor freezes immediately...if slightly warmer, it takes a split second to freeze...so it looks like it's coming from the tail, but it's still coming from the engines. Your ignorance is showing... how, then, to explain the incidents of one plane leaving a chem-trail while being followed a short distance behind by a plane leaving a CON-trail? you would like me to explain how i know the difference, but you don't believe that there is a difference. so it will have to suffice to say that, yes, there is one, and many of us can see it plain as day. Engine type, engine power setting, slight difference in altitude. The trails are BOTH contrails with different circumstances. The differences are about variables you couldn't be more ignorant about if you wanted to be. You may see something...but you don't understand what you see. Stop pretending that you are in a position to dismiss the facts for this stupid bullshit. You don't. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4759598 United States 12/14/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/14/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25792038 United States 12/14/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29550310 Australia 12/14/2012 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29838123 Denmark 12/14/2012 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29212529 United States 12/14/2012 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To all of you who think chemtrails are just fragments of "tin foil cap" loonies, please explain this to me. Quoting: Small Family Farmer 14191796 I live in a very rural area. Since 97 I've watched planes emit trails of material that you claim are simply normal engine emissions. The planes that flew over my farm were flying at such a high elevations that I couldn't clearly see where the emissions came out on the plane. So for years I couldn't say for a fact that what I was seeing wasn't some form of atmospheric pollution as a result of reformulated jet fuel. Last week one of those planes flew at a low enough elevation that I could see where the trails were coming from. Imagine my surprise when I saw the emissions were coming out of the tail fins rather than the engines on the wings. Unless these planes are designed to route engine emissions through the fuselage and out vents on the tail fins then what is coming out of those planes has nothing to do with engine emissions. PERIOD. Nope...it's because of the air temperature. If its colder, the vapor freezes immediately...if slightly warmer, it takes a split second to freeze...so it looks like it's coming from the tail, but it's still coming from the engines. Your ignorance is showing... how, then, to explain the incidents of one plane leaving a chem-trail while being followed a short distance behind by a plane leaving a CON-trail? you would like me to explain how i know the difference, but you don't believe that there is a difference. so it will have to suffice to say that, yes, there is one, and many of us can see it plain as day. You DO know that the temperature changes with altitude, correct? Also dewpoint, relative humidity and other things. Then include aircraft weight/power setting, engine type and so on. There are many variables that could change the contrails, but altitude is the likely persistant/non-persistant culprit. |