so if todays EQ in NZ was on the lines, how can you say the 7.1 in Sept 2010 was on the lines too? Quoting: Helkuit
A) theres several lines NOT in this current image rendering and weren't connected since there was no need to because I've already posted maps that SHOW THEM... Or in other words, the ORIGINAL Ley Line Map already HAS/shows the Line that goes thru CHRISTCHURCH.
B) you don't understand the type of ENERGY that these "LINES" radiate and harness.
So any literal interpretation and margin you use or assign in trying to measure or understand these ley lines which also doesn't take into account the above factors, will yield the type of misunderstanding you have, especially given the size of Earth and what I've explained about a quakes rupture zone/radius.
please explain, or do the lines move to suit your needs? Quoting: Helkuit
SOME Quakes occur DEAD CENTER "ON" the actual MAP LINES I've drawn and SOME OCCUR NEAR THEM within approx 50 to 150 miles.
Apparently you're not understanding what LEY LINES are and what I've explained about them since your premise or what you're suggesting, assumes these "lines" are literally as wide as the size of the "MARKINGS" and anything that happens off the "markings" means it "missed" and has no RELATIONSHIP or connection to these "lines". So your assumption and what you're implying, is based on a false premise.
Before making statements ASSuming I'm "moving" them to suit my needs as one of the "choices" you're thinking, I suggest rephrasing your question and derogatory tone which is out of line and unnecessary... unless of course you have an agenda and have no interest in considering there might be information and knowledge to explain and answer what you're implying makes no sense or can't be explained based upon out-moded science you've been taught.