Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,353 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 849,867
Pageviews Today: 1,028,518Threads Today: 180Posts Today: 2,803
07:58 AM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War

Offer Upgrade

User ID: 14
02/03/2006 09:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War
Remember the Third World War will not happen if the Western World and the entire population of Planet Earth changes from being Victims full of Fear and Victim Mind Patterns to people who wish to live with Love in their hearts and not allow the Reptilian Illuminati Families to turn Planet Earth into a Global Fascist Police State that will make Nazi Germany look like a tea party.

Get Ready For World War Three

15th of August 15 2005

By Paul Craig Roberts

With every poll showing majorities of Americans both fed up with Bush's war against Iraq and convinced that Bush's invasion of Iraq has made Americans less safe, the White House moron proposes to start another war by attacking Iran. VP Cheney has already ordered the U.S. Strategic Command to come up with plans to strike Iran with tactical nuclear weapons.

Bush refuses to meet with Cindy Sheehan, instead using his vacation time at the Crawford ranch to talk war with Israeli television. In a recent interview with Israeli TV, Bush said "All options are on the table" with regard to Iran.

Likudnik Israel is Bush's last remaining ally, or egger-on, in his war against "Islamic terrorism." Israel, which is loaded with nuclear weapons and is not a signatory to the nuclear pacts, is the accuser against Iran, asserting that Iran's nuclear energy program is just a veil behind which to produce weapons. Israel's Likud Party fears that Iranian weapons would be a check to its plans to complete the dispossession of the Palestinians and further expand Israel's borders.

Iran has signed the nonproliferation pact and is willing for the International Atomic Energy Agency to monitor the nuclear energy program.

Bush, however, dismisses all facts and assurances and is willing to attack Iran based on nothing but Israel's paranoia.

Bush can ignore the American public, because the Democrats, like the Tory Party in the UK, have completely collapsed as an opposition party. The Republican Party is now increasingly referred to as the Republikud Party.

The only check on Bush is the lack of U.S. troops. Bogged down in the Iraqi quagmire, U.S. commanders are stating that a third rotation of our exhausted and demoralized troops in Iraq can be avoided only by troop withdrawals by next spring.

However, on Aug. 11, Bush nixed the military's talk of reducing U.S. troops in Iraq. The next day, the commander of U.S. logistics in Iraq announced that the number of insurgent attacks on US forces along supply routes has doubled in the last year, making it clear that far from winning, the U.S. is not even holding its own.

Cindy Sheehan has the right question for Bush: What noble cause is being served by all this suffering and destruction?

Bush is in hiding from Mrs. Sheehan, because he knows only ignoble causes are being served. According to the CIA, the main beneficiary of the war is Osama bin Laden's recruitment drives. While America's military recruitment falters and U.S. generals announce that the war has broken the Reserves and National Guard, the cause of Islamic extremism basks in the Iraqi war.

Gentle reader, do you realize the danger of having a president so disconnected from reality that he plots to attack Iran a country three times the size of Iraq when he lacks sufficient forces to occupy Baghdad and to protect the road from Baghdad to the airport?

Despite all the high profile "sweeps" of US Army and US Marine Corp forces through insurgent strongholds, US Strategic Commanders report a doubling of insurgent attacks.

The Bush Administration is insane. If the American people do not decapitate it by demanding Bush's impeachment, the Bush administration will bring about Armageddon. This may please some Christian evangelicals conned by Rapture predictions, but World War Three will please no one else.
You can destroy our planet, but the souls are going to keep on going, they'll keep on getting new bodies and going on to other planets. So in the end, it doesn't really matter
ReptilianWatch (OP)

User ID: 14
02/03/2006 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War
It is time for the world to wake up before all this madness starts in the next few months. Remember the joint US Army and US Marine Corp Base in Israel was to be completed by the 31st of August 2005. Whatever the Reptilian Illuminati Families are planning is being pushed through in a hurry. This US Army and US Marine Corp Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force Base, JSOTFB is massive with a holding capacity of over 150,000 US Military personnel with two run ways, helipads, deep level independant electricity generators and water supplies. This JSOTFB is over 25 acres in size or around 5 miles across. Apparently it is now being expanded and made even bigger.

How George W. Bush Would Gain From A War With Iran

America has the capability and reasons for an assault and it is hard to see how Britain could remain uninvolved.

[This is especially relevant because Britain and America are controlled largely by the Windsor Illuminati Family even though the Rothschild Illuminati Family control the City of London and the Federal Reserve in America].

15th of August 2005

By Daniel Plesch

The Guardian

President Bush has reminded us that he is prepared to take military action to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. On Israeli television this weekend, he declared that "all options are on the table" if Tehran doesn't comply with international demands.

In private his officials deride EU and UN diplomacy with Iran. US officials have been preparing pre-emptive war since Bush marked Iran out as a member of the "axis of evil" back in 2002. Once again, this war is likely to have British support.

Article continues


A plausible spin could be that America and Britain must act where the international community has failed, and that their action is the responsible alternative to an Israeli attack. The conventional wisdom is that, even if diplomacy fails, the US is so bogged down in Iraq that it could not take on Iran. However, this misunderstands the capabilities and intentions of the Bush administration.

America's devastating air power is not committed in Iraq. Just 120 B52, B1 and B2 bombers could hit 5,000 targets in a single mission. Thousands of other warplanes and missiles are available. The army and marines are heavily committed in Iraq, but enough forces could be found to secure coastal oilfields and to conduct raids into Iran.

A US attack is unlikely to be confined to the suspected WMD locations or to involve a ground invasion to occupy the country. The strikes would probably be intended to destroy military, political and (oil excepted) economic infrastructure. A disabled Iran could be further paralysed by civil war. Tehran alleges US support for separatists in the large Azeri population of the north-west, and fighting is increasing in Iranian Kurdistan.

The possible negative consequences of an attack on Iran are well known: an increase in terrorism; a Shia rising in Iraq; Hizbullah and Iranian attacks on Israel; attacks on oil facilities along the Gulf and a recession caused by rising oil prices. Advocates of war argue that if Iran is allowed to go nuclear then each of these threats to America and Israeli interests becomes far greater. In this logic, any negative consequence becomes a further reason to attack now - with Iran disabled all these threats can, it is argued, be reduced.

Iraq is proving an electoral liability. This is a threat to the Bush team's intention to retain power for the next decade - perhaps, as the author Bob Woodward says, with President Dick Cheney at the helm. War with Iran next spring can enable them to win the mid-term elections and retain control of the Republican party, now in partial rebellion over Iraq.

The rise in oil prices and subsequent recession are reasons some doubt that an attack would take place. However, Iran's supplies are destined for China, perceived as Americas main long-term rival. And the George W. Bush team are experienced enough to remember that Ronald Reagan rode out the recession of the early 1980s on a wave of rhetoric about "Evil Empire".

Even if the US went ahead, runs the argument, Britain would not be involved as Tony Blair would not want a rerun of the Iraq controversy. But British forces are already in the area: they border Iran around Basra, and will soon lead the Nato force on Iran's Afghanstani frontier. The British island of Diego Garcia is a critical US Navy Base.

It is hard to see Britain uninvolved in American actions. The prime minister is clearly of a mind to no more countenance Iran's WMD than he did Iraq's. In Iran's case the evidence is more substantial. The Iranians do have a nuclear energy programme and have lied about it. In any event, Blair is probably aware that the US is unlikely to supply him with the prized successor to the Trident submarine if Britain refuses to continue to pay the blood sacrifice of standing with the USA. Tory votes might provide sufficient "national unity" to see off Labour dissenters.

New approaches are needed to head off such a dismal scenario. The problem on WMD is that Blair and Bush are doing too little, not too much. Why pick on Iran rather than India, Pakistan, Israel or Egypt - not to mention the west's weapons? In the era of Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan, political will created treaties that still successfully control many types of WMD. Revived, they would provide the basis for global controls. Iran must not be dealt with in isolation.

As the Iran debate unfolds, we will no doubt again hear about the joint intelligence committee. We should follow the advice of a former head of the committee, Sir Paul Lever, to remove US intelligence officials from around the JIC table, where they normally sit. Only in this way, argues Lever, can the British take a considered view themselves.

We need to be clear that our MPs have no mandate to support an attack on Iran. During the election campaign, the government dismissed any suggestion that Iran might be attacked as ridiculous scaremongering. If Tony Blair has told George W. Bush that Britain will prevent Iran's nuclear weapons "come what may", we need to be equally clear that nothing short of an election would provide the mandate for an attack.
You can destroy our planet, but the souls are going to keep on going, they'll keep on getting new bodies and going on to other planets. So in the end, it doesn't really matter

User ID: 44530
United States
02/03/2006 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War
Posting this here because you ignored it in your other post.

Reptilian Watch, you seem like an intelligent individual, so please answer me a few questions(if you're able).

If reptilian/humans have been here for so long, how come we don't notice this phenomenon more often?

I'm sure you're aware of the Illuminati power structure, and you must know the ruling elite are "behind the curtains" and that bush and co. are just stupid muppets. Since this is the case, why wouldn't they use humans(which aren't subject to shape-shifting sicknesses) as their marionets(all people that would be in public attention)? --(this question stems from the assumption they are advanced, and thus far more intelligent than I, and have the common sense to account for all possible scenarios to cover their asses)

These reptilians are super advanced race right? Why would they let our feeble race control other parts of the world?(You say they only control America and Europe) Why not just take control of everything?

If they are super advanced, why don't they make their population control techniques better rather than subtle mind control/manipulation?(like, with our current technologies it's possible for us to control entire nations of people merely through military force, in which every action can be stricly dictated - quite a lot more control than what we're experiencing)

And finally(and most importantly - this is the only one I would really appeciate an answer on), why do YOU believe this stuff, what have you seen that personally proves this as a truth to you?

I would like some HARD evidence.(I consider your first picture as very close "hard" evidence, because we've all have bike accidents before and a) no one lands directly face forward like that and b) lets assume he did, we've all seen scraped up hands, and that's OBVIOUSLY from something else.

But I say very close because ya know, without any theories(examining purely what I can see on my own - I don't trust anyone, especially in very weighty topics like this) all I can see is he has some cuts and scrapes and he did not get them like the official story says(I can see the cover-up, but I have no idea what they're covering up)

Just to let you know, I'm not a dumb and blind skeptic, when I first heard this Reptilian theory(like a year ago)it immediately resonated with me, but that could be merely from a memory of having heard it earlier in my life(I don't know).
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14
02/03/2006 10:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War
ravin, ill pm you some answers, a little later tonight or tomorrow (very tired)

i praise you for your open mindedness

User ID: 69589
02/03/2006 10:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War
i'm saving your testes repitialnwatch, keep em coming.
"True peace can only be achieved in the cold darkness." - Morrigan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11689806
United Kingdom
03/01/2012 12:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Reptilian Illuminati Plan To Create The Third World War