is there a page which explains this 26,000 year alignment in a way that is simple? | |
~! User ID: 5366990 United States 12/08/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20590319 Canada 12/08/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But, if you're referring to the Sun appearing to cross the Dark Rift/Galactic Center, that happens every year. Quoting: phoomp [link to www.nasa.gov] This thread is about the EARTH. You seem to keep having troubles comprehending that point. Your very intent on misdirection. If you can't convince them confuse them right. |
Isis One User ID: 14343270 United States 12/08/2012 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Take a look at these two. It helped me understand Quoting: Indysmindy clearly what's going/ might happen. [link to alignment2012.com] [link to www.maya12-21-2012.com] So, its really a 36 year span that we cross the galactic center 1980-2016. This was helpful. Spread the word, change the collective conscious...... THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me One doesn't discover new lands without consenting to lose sight, for a very long time, of the shore. Andre Gide [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20590319 Canada 12/08/2012 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States 12/08/2012 09:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No because there is no 26,000 yr alignment. Well, I am sure there is, but why pick an even number how about 22,176. wait, thats an even # how about every 24,176. Or every 24,575 years? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5366990 21,176 yrs sounds good to me. 22,178. I knew I could remember. I will tell you a story about a girl born 1010 at 1010 and when numbers foretold history. I promise to you that following a glass skull, will not lead you to redemption. If you want to hear the rest you will have to wait till the the 12's. 12 21 12 |
DanG User ID: 22108338 United States 12/08/2012 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | think of the solar system as being like one of those horses on a fairground ride, constantly going up and down Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29339458 when the horse is at it's lowest point and highest point, is when we're well away from trouble when it's at the mid point is when we're in shit up to our necks that's December 21 whether or not we all die depends on mother earth NOT swallowing some of that brown sticky stuff am i over simplifying this now? Excellent synopsis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1617215 United States 12/08/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States 12/08/2012 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No because there is no 26,000 yr alignment. Well, I am sure there is, but why pick an even number how about 22,176. wait, thats an even # how about every 24,176. Or every 24,575 years? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5366990 21,176 yrs sounds good to me. 22,178. I knew I could remember. I will tell you a story about a girl born 1010 at 1010 and when numbers foretold history. I promise to you that following a glass skull, will not lead you to redemption. If you want to hear the rest you will have to wait till the the 12's. 12 21 12 22,176 I made it through 101010. I am sure you will make it through 121212 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5366990 United States 12/08/2012 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Stealth521 User ID: 26063216 United States 12/08/2012 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I prefer to think of it as a disc on the back of four elephants standing on a giant turtle's back. Quoting: Leslie Zevo Oook? Ooook. Last Edited by #521 on 12/08/2012 09:34 PM |
TBar1984 User ID: 29378283 United States 12/08/2012 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i found this page: Quoting: pink cat [link to alignment2012.com] but even that is hard to understand. but it seems to be the most reasonable one i have found so far. The 'alignment' you appear to be concerned about happened back in 1998. Nothing happened back in 1998, it's over... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17090286 United States 12/08/2012 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I prefer to think of it as a disc on the back of four elephants standing on a giant turtle's back. Quoting: Leslie Zevo Oook? Ooook. :chimp: [link to images.wikia.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29361107 Australia 12/08/2012 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and how this alignment is NOT the same as the one that happens every year on the winter solstice. Quoting: pink cat any advice for a good page to send people to to read about this? because this nasa thing: [link to www.nasa.gov] bugs me how nasa says " Each December the Earth and sun align with the approximate center of the Milky Way Galaxy but that is an annual event of no consequence." but that is not what alignment people are talking about in 2012. it really is an alignment that happens every 26,000 years. i'm trying to find a page that will describe it accurately and simply. but yes, this is disinfo in that yes, what they say is true, BUT what they fail to leave out is that the mayan calendar is not referring to this annual alignment. and i would like a simple page i can point to for my friends to understand because i am having a hard time explaining it. it's a made up story to accompany the myth. that is why there is no accurate real information about it. think about it, the galaxy moves, changes and shifts as it rotates. there is no fixed cycle for one point in a galaxy returning to the same point after a rotation. not even the distance from the centre remains constant. |
Chrit User ID: 27088294 United States 12/08/2012 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I prefer to think of it as a disc on the back of four elephants standing on a giant turtle's back. Quoting: Leslie Zevo Oook? Ooook. [link to images.wikia.com] Ye ask and ye receive. I'm only human, it's my biggest flaw. We must all realize a sink a chair and a pillow are all luxuries of home and a soldiers helmet takes the place of all three. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25390958 United States 12/08/2012 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is the one that Phoomp or poooomp or what ever your name is needs to read as you are completely confused with the meaning of Galactic Equator. I kept rereading it until it gelled. seriously concerning stuff, doesnt guarantee anything happens but the odds increase quite a bit, and the various separate things potentially having increased probability of occurances at the same time is also concerning. |
Anonymous Poltroon User ID: 29356165 Mexico 12/08/2012 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29391839 Canada 12/09/2012 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I didn't know any better after having have read this peticular link that they have been CHEMTRAILING to offset or minimize the blast from the Sun thats looks to be imminent sooner or later. I think the Chemtrailing isn't sinister at all. I think its been for the planets own good. Thanks for starting this thread Pink Cat. God Bless you and yours. You are wise. The maximization of survival numbers for population self support is of the greatest concern. This will not happen this month in the way that is listed here. A controlled depopulation must take place before the final cleansing. It is only after this cleansing that the optimal population numbers and skill set will be reached. So it shall be. I'm guessing the optimal population number is about half a billion so I guess it's to bad so sad for 6.5 billion folks |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16310244 Netherlands 12/09/2012 08:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25390958 United States 12/09/2012 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I didn't know any better after having have read this peticular link that they have been CHEMTRAILING to offset or minimize the blast from the Sun thats looks to be imminent sooner or later. I think the Chemtrailing isn't sinister at all. I think its been for the planets own good. Thanks for starting this thread Pink Cat. God Bless you and yours. You are wise. The maximization of survival numbers for population self support is of the greatest concern. This will not happen this month in the way that is listed here. A controlled depopulation must take place before the final cleansing. It is only after this cleansing that the optimal population numbers and skill set will be reached. So it shall be. I'm guessing the optimal population number is about half a billion so I guess it's to bad so sad for 6.5 billion folks optimum for who? Not optimum for those who are too acquisitive and greedy for property that they themselves cant hold. The only problem is for wannabe royalty that wants lands cleared of any current occupants that might choose to refuse becoming subjects based on some wannabe royals lawyer holding a piece of paper telling you to clear off or die |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25390958 United States 12/09/2012 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20223910 If I didn't know any better after having have read this peticular link that they have been CHEMTRAILING to offset or minimize the blast from the Sun thats looks to be imminent sooner or later. I think the Chemtrailing isn't sinister at all. I think its been for the planets own good. Thanks for starting this thread Pink Cat. God Bless you and yours. You are wise. The maximization of survival numbers for population self support is of the greatest concern. This will not happen this month in the way that is listed here. A controlled depopulation must take place before the final cleansing. It is only after this cleansing that the optimal population numbers and skill set will be reached. So it shall be. I'm guessing the optimal population number is about half a billion so I guess it's to bad so sad for 6.5 billion folks Correction optimum for who? Not optimum EXCEPT for those who are too acquisitive and greedy for property that they themselves cant hold, so they want property cleared off for them. The only problem is for wannabe royalty that wants lands cleared of any current occupants that might choose to refuse becoming subjects based on some wannabe royals lawyer holding a piece of paper telling you to clear off or die |
phoomp User ID: 1894576 Canada 12/09/2012 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this might help Quoting: Anonymous Poltroon The Galactic Equator isn´t arbitrary and it´s not the Plane Interesting. Given that, according to this video, the "Galactic Equator" (or, more appropriately, the equatorial plane of the galactic reference system) is apparently a plane connecting our Sun to the centre of our galaxy (Sagittarius A*), it doesn't seem possible for us to "travel below the Galactic Equator". Once again, there appears to be no DOOM! here. |
phoomp User ID: 1894576 Canada 12/09/2012 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WindyMind User ID: 29553979 United States 12/10/2012 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Magnets push away and suck together and the earth responds to the magnetic suction of this alignment with earthquakes. More magnets coming together squishes the earth. It's being squished. :). I am just waiting for a scientist to back me up with big words to explain this idea. It's not gonna happen is it? |