accept the facts User ID: 29351945
Brazil 12/08/2012 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 Some Wikipedia for you: The Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 was a cold snap that affected the central United States on Saturday, November 11, 1911. Many cities broke record highs, going into the 70s and 80s early that afternoon. By nightfall, cities were dealing with temperatures in the teens and single-digits on the Fahrenheit scale. This is the only day in many midwest cities' weather bureau jurisdictions where the record highs and lows were broken for the same day. Temperatures in Kansas City had reached a record high of 76° F (24 °C) by late morning before the front moved through. As the cold front approached, the winds increased turning from southeast to northwest. By midnight, the temperature had dropped to 11° F (−11.7 °C), a 65 Fahrenheit degree (35 celsius degree) difference in 14 hoursIn Springfield, the temperature difference was even more extreme. Springfield was at 80 °F (27 °C) before the cold front moved through. Two hours later, the temperature was at 40 °F (4 °C) with winds blasting out of the northwest at 40 mph (65 km/h). By 7:00 P.M. Central Standard Time (01:00 UTC 12 November) the temperature had dropped a further 7 °F (3.9 °C), and by midnight, a record low of 13 °F (−11 °C) was established. It was the first time since records had been kept for Springfield when the record high and record low were broken in the same day. The freak temperature difference was also a record breaker: 67 °F (37 °C) in 10 hours.
source: [link to en.wikipedia.org] NOW, take a closer look to that date... It's 11-11-1911Get the 1111 and the 911 on it?? In the whole Second Millenium (1000 years), the 911th year was 1911... There is something SUPERNATURAL about the numbers 911 and 1111, and we can not deny it any longer...  |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29351945
Brazil 12/08/2012 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29351945
Brazil 12/08/2012 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29351945
Brazil 12/08/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 Part of the 911 / 1111 phenomenom is supernatural, and part is man-made (secret societies must know something) But we can not deny it any longer... 11/11/1911 WAS a VERY SPECIAL DAY, just look at those FREAK temperature records! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22054163
United States 12/08/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 Yes we did not have a HARP playing at the time that instrument had not been produced in any factory for us neither any lab.
This American HARP accusations has been nothing but poppycock. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29351945
Brazil 12/08/2012 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 Yes we did not have a HARP playing at the time that instrument had not been produced in any factory for us neither any lab.
This American HARP accusations has been nothing but poppycock.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22054163 No HAARP at that time. So, we need to accept that it was SUPERNATURAL... |
NonAlignedEntity
User ID: 26696239
United States 12/08/2012 04:39 PM
 Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 If we postulate, and we just have, that within un-, sub- or supernatural forces the probability is that the law of probability will not operate as a factor, then we must accept that the probability of the first part will not operate as a factor, in which case the law of probability will operate as a factor within un-, sub- or supernatural forces. And since it obviously hasn’t been doing so, we can take it that we are not held within un-, sub- or supernatural forces after all; in all probability, that is. Overstand, this isn't a sermon from the hill, but a 'Trespassers Will Be Shot' Sign. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29371782
Brazil 12/08/2012 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29409345
Brazil 12/09/2012 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29416472
Brazil 12/09/2012 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 911 in Roman numerals = CMXI1111 in Roman numerals = MCXI Since CMXI and MCXI are anagrams of each other, both have the same Gematria value:
[link to www.gematrix.org]
[link to www.gematrix.org] In Simple Gematria, it's 49 (7 x 7)  |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29416472
Brazil 12/09/2012 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29416472
Brazil 12/09/2012 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29416472
Brazil 12/09/2012 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Great Blue Norther of 11/11/1911 is PROOF that something is seriously wrong about 911 and 1111 |