Paedophiles who trade child porn will not be sent to prison: New sentencing laws suggest community punishments

it is what it is to degenerate the argument... just know where you stand and argue to the point... what happens will happen..... paedaphiles still need chemical castration, how can you trust a person with anything if they feel like children are fair game? again tho', that is entirely another thread altogether "declination of child/adult states' for the use in the workforce..... before the 17th century there was no word for 'teenager'... makes me ponder (if i was that way inclined) that we may very well be the 'fallen'

Last Edited by Citizenperth on 12/08/2012 10:41 PM

Pedos who abuse children 12 and younger should be chemically castrated and sent to get psychiatric help, over that to 16 I'd say prison time, 16 and over there should be some form of way for guys up to a logical age maybe 25 or something that parents could give permission for a relationship, without permission or over that age maybe fines? I don't know just making up some ideas here, what you guys think?

A girl is a woman at 15, 16, sometimes 14, But were too far gone with deviancy and kinks and violence that it could not work

In the past, Grandma got married at 12-15 to a hardworking farmer that attended church

Today its drugs and duct tape and rope in the pedos car that pulls up to the dateline sting.. (true story)

here's a cool argument... when i was a child i played doctors and nurses with another neighbour girl... it wasn't that far out but it was 'exploration'.... many other incidence occured throughout my life that i've come to remember after reading this thread.... what seems to be logical is the 'kiss and tell' syndrome that seems embedded in the growing process.... the line then is simply drawn between predator/prey... and youthful exploration or desire.....


yay for me.....

ps : seriously - real pedoes are decernable and require chemical castration both for their benefit, and the fear that parents will go and slay them down.....

Last Edited by Citizenperth on 12/08/2012 10:51 PM

The UK is the worse, have you read about those Muslim gangs abusing young white girls? of course MTV culture conditioned these girls to go out dressed like whores and be available to be victimized. It all stars with the elites.

pedophiles deserves equal rights havent you heard?!

I'm absolutely dreading the day pedos become a 'protected class' and anythng mean you say to them is considered a hate crime.

YES.... WE HATE PEDOS as well we should.


but alas, I degress, this is a repeat of a similar movement some 40 years ago that has suceeded so it will come.


It will be socially acceptable someday.

In many states of the USA, 16 is the legal age for marriage with parental permission, Man can be any age.

As for the other questions for victimizing children under 12...I would like to stone them like in the old testament is what Id like to do. lol. But chemical castration is fine.

I think I can channel my Indian ancestors and come up with some good community centered punishments.

Then when we are done, for any that are still alive, I'll donate my burdizzo to the cause.

Sounds like the Vatican will be a very very busy place but..... it'll have super clean roadways I presume!

they're socially responsible scout masters that take your children for holidays............ sad....... and we only generally and statistically hear years later..... exposure of the sad *unts should be our weapon....

Last Edited by Citizenperth on 12/08/2012 11:04 PM

Yes please! I work in a military prison and these people are creeps man. I say they castrate them! Cheaper than housing them.

It's not just the UK...we have plenty pf pedos here in the US.

[link to www.cantonrep.com]

They are coaches in our high schools.

Fuck the conversation.

It's time to storm the castle.

Once chance. NOW.

Otherwise endure your fate and STFU.

What exactly is wrong with allowing pedophiles to be accepted?

That children should enjoy their infancy and wait to be mature enough to engage in sexual activity, not become the plaything of a depraved adult who wishes to exploit them. children who are sexually molested tend to grow up with lots of issues that hinder their personal growth. It's just not correct to sacrifice the innocence and future of children for the lust of adults, adults have other means to vent their sexual morbidity and should have the strength of will to use them instead of stalking children.

20 years in federal prison w/no parole

[link to www.ky3.com]

Divorce is a problem in that its become rampant and not because the people involved in the marriage have a dire need to escape it but because they're either too lazy to make it work, jumped into it because they thought it would be fun at the time and later found out they paired up with the wrong person or because they've found something better to move on to.

Divorce in my opinion is perfectly acceptable when you find yourself living a fucking nightmare, an extremely abusive marriage for instance. It isn't beneficial for either spouse or the children to be trapped in that situation. I really don't think anyone here would advocate for marriages to continue in those situations, I think it's more about lazy, idiotic people that think marriage is something that you can jump into and jump out of whenever the mood strikes that is the problem.

Homosexuality on the other hand is deemed as deviant sexual behavior & unnatural behavior and could very well lend to the argument that if that sort of thing is ok than why not other deviant sexual behaviors, fetishes, and what not, even those involving children.

See? WTF? Why would anyone dignify this question with an actual conversational answer.

THIS IS THE ONLY ANSWER: :fuckoff2:

OK THAT APPARENTLY WASN'T STRONG ENOUGH

LET'S TRY THIS

The problem with "childhood innocence".

The principal defect of this concept is that it implies that sexuality is a "sin", and that children are "innocent" because they have not as yet indulged in this "sin". The singularly Christian notion of "childhood innocence" is a vestige of our anti-sexual heritage which reached a high point, in many aspects, in the Victorian era. Its origin can be traced to the 1700s. It is a highly irrational notion, and I need not attempt to refute it. For the burden of proof is not on the Author, that sexuality is a sin. I have yet to see an argument that sexuality is a sin, and hence have nothing to refute. I have only come across dogmatic assertions, mainly in the form of religion, of the sinfulness of sexuality and "childhood innocence" (which is implicit in the notion of the sinfulness of sexuality).

You're wrong, look when I was a kid I had never been exposed to anything sexual, my parents didn't allow me to watch any sexual tv program or anything. So basically I knew I liked girls since early age but when I was with some of my childhood gf's I would just kiss them and hold hands, no sexual thought crossed my mind because I wasn't a sexual being yet, it didn't spring out of my mind naturally you see. You could argue that kids can be taught sex and then they will be sexual beings, but that's not the point, the point is that kids not exposed to any sexuality by adults will not naturally and out of their own volition attempt the sexual act by their own until they reach puberty and they begin feeling sexual naturally and their own bodies begin reacting to sexual stimuli. That doesn't happen until aprox 13 or 14 years old, or at least it used to not happen, nowadays some girls are beginning to menstruate much earlier possibily due to the fucked up food we eat.

Nothing to do with religion.

Says the fucking pedophile.

You aren't going to convince anyone here that being a sexual deviant and violating children is good.

Your kind aren't welcome here. You should just leave.

Basically if you could make an experiment and leave some children living alone in an island, without any adults around or any information, I would bet that no kids would attempt to actually have intercourse until they reach puberty, and it would be interesting to see at what age at that, maybe it would be even later than we think without any exposition to outside information.

...that's why the boy scouts are still around

[link to www2.hu-berlin.de]

[link to www2.hu-berlin.de]

"children masturbated in public with no opprobrium."

"During the traditional times, the Pukapukans, Mangarevans, and Marquesans permitted children open sex play (Ford and Beach 1953). The cultural practices of Marquesans and Pukapukans not only allowed open sex play among children but, as mentioned earlier, provided children clandestine opportunities to observe adult sexual behavior due to sleeping arrangements. According to Oliver (1974) on Tahiti, coital simulation became actual penetration as soon as young boys were physiologically able. The Tahitians found children’s imitation of copulation humorous. Other evidence suggests that young girls may have engaged in copulation before age 10"

"In these societies, discussions about sex with children were also very open and frank as part of a pattern of sex positiveness. For example, among the Ra’ivavaens studied by Marshall (1961:241), children were aware of orgasm, the role of the penis (ure) and the clitoris (tira) in sexual arousal."

"Trobrianders, and likely other Papua New Guinea societies, approve of imitative copulation or sex rehearsal play about age 10 or 11"

If it was okay in these societies for children to engage in open sex play, imitate copulation, engage in actual copulation, and okay for them to watch adults engage in sexual activities, then why can't it be okay for us to do the same things today?

theres an iphone app that shows u were registered sex offenders live. Me and my vigilante group beat the shit out of paedophiles for fun.

Not sure why England has decided to reduce the severity of this. Is there that many people that fall into this that they had to reduce it? Or are those involved with the changes involved in it?

Not seeing why the changes would be necessary.

I would agree that those producing are the real criminals, but those consuming are feeding them.

remember how fast they conditioned people into accepting homosexuality.. well paedophilia is the next step in the new world order. this world needs to end fast

That would work..but instead they'll make them do community service at the school or church nursery or something..

my mother suffered from prepubecent syndrome and developed at age 5. so she had boobs from 5 on up, never grew past 4'11"
but was a fully developed by 12.

also had a cousin with same syndrome. boobs by 5 and she never grew past 5 feet.