European Space Agency Indicates Mars’ Moon Phobos is Hollow and Artificial!

There are probably dozens of artifacts like this one in our solar system...

whys it a joke?

We know too much now.

"There's a monolith there - a very unusual structure on this little potato shaped object that goes around Mars once every seven hours."

Thread: meet me at the giant potato

Agreed. Unidentified Flying Object automatically becames Extra-terristial Pilots in Alien space craft and their Terrain Landers.

They can't get into the fact that the unidentified flying object over your head, may well be the Drone that I built last month, or 100 years ago.. ala Tesla.. Humans are 'too dumb' so it has to be Little Grey (formerly Green but they were wrong, and before that it was White, Blue Eyed, Blonde, Venusians).

Once again, the acronym, U.F.O. simply means, "Un-identified Flying Object"... It simply means that you seeing it, cannot at that time Identify it.

Civil Defense in war time of first 2/3rds of the 20th Century was all about identifying Friend or Foe in the airs over your head.

Always be on guard for these words, May, May be, Might, Mighr be, Could be, and Probably -- and their derivitives.

And that really big word, if, If, IF....

our moon being one of them. that's why they are not allowed on it, that's why they had to fake going there, to save face.

Porous would probably be a better term than hollow. They certainly did not say it was artificial. While it appears to have cavities, the moon's moment of inertia is too low to be a hollow sphere (somewhere around .36 to .42 from what I've seen vs .66 for a hollow sphere). Now it is interesting to point out that making living spaces in subsurface caverns of a large asteroid to be used as a natural space ship is one suggested future method of exploration, so while it wouldn't be truly hollow or artificial, it would end up looking something like that, just with a lot of equipment on the surface as well.

that's why they tried to nuke it to impress russia and get revenge on those preventing them landing on moon

Last Edited by Zeff on 12/09/2012 04:22 PM

How dare you call the Political Elite of planet Earth, Advanced Life Forms.

Want to know why no one has landed a lander on Phobos? Ah, how many times have anyone or everyone ever tried to land on Phobos? Twice? Once? Oh, that's right, NEVER.

Joseph Shklovskii noted member of the Soviet Academy of science and co-writer with Dr Carl Sagan of 'Intelligent life in the universe', once calculated from the estimated density of the Martian atmosphere and the peculiar "acceleration" of Phobos, that the satellite must be hollow.

Could Phobos be a hollowed-out space station of huge proportions? In July 1988, the Russians launched two unmanned satellite probes - Phobos 1 and Phobos 2 - in the direction of Mars, with the primary intention of investigating the planet's mysterious moon, Phobos.

Phobos 1 was unfortunately lost en route two months later, reportedly because of a radio command error. Phobos 2 was also ultimately lost in the most intriguing circumstances, but not before it had beamed back certain images and information from the planet Mars itself.

Phobos 2 arrived safely at Mars in January 1989 and entered into an orbit around Mars as the first step at its destination towards its ultimate goal: to transfer to an orbit that would make it fly almost in tandem with the Martian moonlet called Phobos (hence the spacecrafts name) and explore the moonlet with highly sophisticated equipment that included two packages of instruments to be placed on the moonlet's surface.

All went well until Phobos 2 aligned itself with Phobos, the Martian moonlet. Then, on 28th March, the Soviet mission control center acknowledged sudden communication "problems" with the spacecraft; and Tass, the official Soviet news agency, reported that "Phobos 2 had failed to communicate with Earth as scheduled after completing an operation yesterday around the Martian moon Phobos. Scientists at mission control have been unable to establish stable radio contact."

[link to www.ufos-aliens.co.uk]

[link to www.ufos-aliens.co.uk]

According to some Religious "Holy Books", yes... according to others, No.

Opps.. there is that hedge word: POSSIBLY..

of course also implies the "maybe / maybe not" hedge, ala, Possibly Not.

PROBABLY -- another hedge word, made out of worthless financial derivative hedge funds.

Hollow, ok, but artificial? Where does it state that?

Cue up, Hoagland's Phobos images.

[link to www.enterprisemission.com]

and

[link to www.enterprisemission.com]

Its been awhile since I have seen any Hoagland Phobos stuff on this forum.

+1 for a great series

is anyone else thinking about the game DOOM

1 star....just for drill.

Isn't it sad that we did not build an assembly line for the Viking landers, so we could even put one on the upcoming 3Km wide comet coming in to swing around the Sun, and back out into the nether realms of the Solar System? Piggy backing on Asteriods that are of the Eros type and the others? Nope.. no such thing.. its too forward looking to do such things.

Of course the Poli-Tics won't allow us mere mortals to demand they fund the space problems of the nations at the same levels they (the Poli-Tics) insiste we spend on 'Defense and Offense" Militarially spaeking.

Thanks : )

[link to www.ufodigest.com]

"They" are now saying that Luna's crust is a bit thinner than was thought to be the case years ago.

[link to www.space-travel.com]

That has to be a bogus story. I just can't believe it - period.

Are you serious?

How the hell would they be able to live in it?

Last Edited by Éireann on 12/09/2012 04:43 PM

The official ESA Phobos website offers explicit scientific data from multiple perspectives, which strongly support the idea that this is what radar echoes would look like, coming back from inside an enormous geometric spaceship. Phobos has an internal, 3-D geometric radar signature. The concurrence of all three of these independent Mars Express experiments, imaging, internal mass distribution, (tracking) and internal radar imaging, now agree that “the interior of Phobos’ is partially hollow with internal, geometric ‘voids’ inside it.” Geometric? Phobos is not a natural!

Ethier the people disagreeing with the article are illiterate, ignorant, or plain stupid finish the article before you barf out a answer it plainly states here within the article that it is partially hollow and has geometric shapes therin, which are not formed in nature UNLESS its a gigantic Geode which I would be one of the only other possiblities.

Oh shit, I just started reading up on this a bit. Wow! Complete rabbithole....

Geometric.. consider the humble NaCl crystal.. how geometric are they, or any of a zillion naturally derived and grown crystals.. oh, I forgot, every one of them is 'alien.human' constructed.

Look at the gypsum crystals in the Crystal Caves in Mexico.. I suppose those too are alien/human created.

One does wonder how been the crystal geometrics of natural crystals 10 miles under our ground are in size?

Of course, grab the ET Hypothesis of origins even of Phobos (wait until they get to Demos), at the first possible opportunity.

The Hitchhiker's Guide of the Perplexed was correct after all, ET-Aliens Created the body of the Planet Earth too. Don't they call Earth.. Space-Ship Earth after all?

And poor little ole Rabbit Demos gets not attention at all.. that's where the HQ is.

It is ancient ship that was used to transport colonists into solar system in the first place.

Just because you don't believe it does not mean its bogus friend.....