European Space Agency Indicates Mars’ Moon Phobos is Hollow and Artificial!

bump

interesting

Yeah. I shouldn't have posted that so quickly. After looking into the geode possibility, everything is kind of changing as to how I think about Phobos. Sorry about my snotty response, OP.

simple facts here is

that it has been deemed interesting enough for a few diffrent countries to sent craft to land/photo/scan etc

for diffrent astronomers to conclude its orbit is strange enough to think its no simple moon

and for the disinfo brigade to be all over it

myself i think there might we something about this "moon"but im sure we aint being told what...

No, not for anyone with 2 funtioning brain cells-yes that excludes you.

Earth
"The continental crust is typically from 30 km (20 mi) to 50 km (30 mi) thick and is mostly composed of slightly less dense rocks than those of the oceanic crust."
( [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Mars
"The average thickness of the planet's crust is about 50 km (31 mi), with a maximum thickness of 125 km (78 mi)"
( [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Venus
"Venus's crust appears to be 50 kilometres (31 mi) in thickness, and composed of silicate rocks"
( [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Here's a video on this. The missile came from Mars not Phobos.

[link to www.youtube.com]

NO

Almost everything I say on this website is something weird, like something that I've never even expressed before just to blow off steam; the rest is mostly threads I've started or replied to in order to critique other's viewpoints.

However when it comes to this comment by brent pops I just want to say that there is at least a little bit of truth to what is being said in it about the probe, and there is more to it than that even.

I believe it to be the only compelling evidence that exists involving UFO's and strange coincidences that isn't taken seriously enough; I believe it could even be international in scope.

It involves more than one mission and more than one superpower.

At this time, though, I have forgotten some of it due to getting distracted from it all.

For anyone who is really good at researching a topic and all of the related loose ends to it, I would really recommend taking a look into this.

There is evidence for something out of the ordinary when it comes to this matter and it cannot be explained away as easily as other UFO incidents.

Keeping in mind that with any matter of this nature there are always going to be people exaggerating and making outrageous claims, like the OP, so keep that in mind and don't let it sway you one way or the other.

although making an asteroid a liveable space would be somewhat inconvenient when compared to a semi-liveable planet that would require nothing more than the introduction of a few non-native plants in order to make the atmosphere conducive to your own survival.....wouldn't even take a generation if enough of the right plants were introduced.

then it would a self-sustaining system, requiring no maintenance

in other words : easier to live on a planet not QUITE suited to you than to live on an asteroid that is NOT AT ALL suited for life.

Now watch while all the Illuminati, Masons, Psychopaths, Sociopaths, Malignants, and Megalomaniacs crawl out of the wood-work and "claim" it was "them" that built it, that it belongs to "them".

They will claim "they" always knew about it, and that "they" always had references to it in "their" secret books and writings.

Probably will conjure up some really convincing fabricated crap too.

"They" are the only ones privelaged enough to know the truth.

Same as our own moon. Artificial

In Greek mythology, Phobos is one of the sons of Ares (Mars) and Aphrodite (Venus).

"Phobos" is Greek for "fear" (the root of "phobia").

Discovered 1877 August 18 by Hall; photographed by Mariner 9 in 1971, Viking 1 in 1977, and Phobos in 1988.

Phobos orbits Mars below the synchronous orbit radius. Thus it rises in the west, moves very rapidly across the sky and sets in the east, usually twice a day. It is so close to the surface that it cannot be seen above the horizon from all points on the surface of Mars.

And Phobos is doomed: because its orbit is below synchronous altitude tidal forces are lowering its orbit (current rate: about 1.8 meters per century). In about 50 million years it will either crash onto the surface of Mars or (more likely) break up into a ring. (This is the opposite effect to that operating to raise the orbit of the Moon.)

Source:
[link to nineplanets.org]

Nowhere. Because this is a thread.

Because of that, I just voted BS plus an unpin sgst.

OP, what is wrong with you, you had a good story, but turned it to crap.

You missed the point, which was to create a spaceship. It's a whole hell of a lot more feasible to get an asteroid to move where you want it than a planet (and it's still not terribly easy). And you're assuming a great many things about the "unsuitable" planet being able to sustain your plant life. And even if you succeed, it'll all be for nothing if you decide to use your planet as a spaceship and thereby knock out the delicate ecosystem balance by changing your orbital radius. The whole point is to be able to have living areas under the surface that you have complete control over the temperature, lighting, even humidity and none of it is disturbed by moving about the solar system or beyond as you please.

This is fascinating.

hollow heads

and the troll comes in fuks the whole chat up with spam.

getting intresting i think they are about to announce somthing here.

There's a video Inter view with one of the Apollo astronauts where he's asked about ET's and he says something like "of course theyre out there, look att the obelisk on phobos"

It's mainstream peeps, they throwing it in yer face.
We are the product of genetic manipulation by either our descendants from far in the future or we are test subjects of another superior intelligence. We've been around a lot longer than we've been taught and we populated mars until the atmosphere was lost/destroyed somehow. Whether our ancestors fled Mars to come here or we simultaeneously inhabited both is the only real question

You fucking mook duche bag its in the title and if you read the article it says not natural thus, ARTIFICIAL.
So

How can it be artificial? It just looks like an asteroid. It is an irregular surface, not metal plated or artificial looking in any way. I don't buy it. It may be hollow due to the way it was formed and we may not exactly know how that works sometimes with the formation of moons.. I don't buy it. Not one bit.

Exactly which Nations or Space Agencies have ever sent a Lander on Phobos with that expressed mission? How many?

Perhaps the USA, and the Russians, and perhaps the ESA.. but other than that if even that many, what other ones?

Seems countries have to at least make it to Lunar Orbit before trying for Mars orbit.

So, just which, 'few different countries'?

Hmmmmmm?

Op you failed! 1 star for such a lie.

The word "ARTIFICIAL" is nowhere in the article.

Hint, look at Asteroid/Planet Drawf Vesta for comparison... see the similarities? Perhaps Vesta is also Hollow and Artificial as well? Nah, that would be just way Too Much!

The 4th, Phobos is a captured Comet core. That is one 'origin' theory that has never been commented or even posed for Phobos.

I knew it!

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

OK, I Googled the "Phobos Incident" and found this:

[link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]

It's by that fraudster, Zachariah Sitchin. Color me skeptical.

Does anyone have something VERIFIABLE that doesn't originate with that scamster?

..... or DISINFO planted by a lying fucking Freemason.