| Users Online Now: 2,805 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 783,141 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,234,122 | Threads Today: 514 | Posts Today: 7,131 |
| 11:37 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,805 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 783,141 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,234,122 | Threads Today: 514 | Posts Today: 7,131 |
| 11:37 AM | ||
Judge finds NC ‘Choose Life’ plates unconstitutional | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16619711  United States12/10/2012 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Project_Deimos User ID: 999284 United States12/10/2012 01:58 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's funny - I don't recall a requirement to "balance" every example of free-speech with its ideological opposite. If the "other" group wants them, they need to exercise their free speech to push for it - not depend on the STATE to DECREE "free speech" should be "balanced". Last Edited by Project_Deimos on 12/10/2012 02:00 PM "There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29563923  Canada12/10/2012 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Conkified User ID: 1500667 United States12/10/2012 02:21 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's funny - I don't recall a requirement to "balance" every example of free-speech with its ideological opposite. Quoting: Project_Deimos If the "other" group wants them, they need to exercise their free speech to push for it - not depend on the STATE to DECREE "free speech" should be "balanced". I would guess that the ruling is aimed at the "State's" speech, not yours. The State can't support one cause above the other, even secondarily, through only offering one type (or design) of a State issued License. Your speech isn't being curtailed, unless you are the side without apparent representation...just sayin' Conk  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26383292 United States12/10/2012 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's funny - I don't recall a requirement to "balance" every example of free-speech with its ideological opposite. Quoting: Project_Deimos If the "other" group wants them, they need to exercise their free speech to push for it - not depend on the STATE to DECREE "free speech" should be "balanced". I would guess that the ruling is aimed at the "State's" speech, not yours. The State can't support one cause above the other, even secondarily, through only offering one type (or design) of a State issued License. Your speech isn't being curtailed, unless you are the side without apparent representation...just sayin' Conk no doubt if the NC population requested such a plate it would be issued....they never miss an opportuniy to make another nickel! This Judge is out of line....nothing backs his so-called decision. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25390958 United States12/10/2012 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26646277 United States12/10/2012 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26383292 United States12/10/2012 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
