The very text used to make claim that Peter is given RULE is taken completely out of context. Even the Strong's Concordance (which is limited in understanding the original intent) states clearly that Peter is the "piece of a rock" and that the rock mentioned by Jesus "upon this rock I will build my church" is a MASS of rock--the same rock used for the parable of a house built upon a rock. The whole thing is taken out of context. Jesus asked Peter about who HE thought Jesus was. His reply that he was the Christ, the Son of the Living God IS THE ROCK upon which the church is built and clearly means that NO MEDIATOR ON EARTH and no man told him that. That was revealed to him by God the Father and THAT is what the church is built on--certainly not the "piece of rock" but the MASSIVE ROCK of personal revelation with God the Father of whom Jesus clearly says he came in the first place; "I am come so that you may know HIM who sent me." This has been totally twisted as so many other Scriptures are twisted by the Vatican since day one.

As to the bread (which I assume you are talking about the Eucharist), is ALSO TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT AND TWISTED. First of all, they were at MEAL. They were eating and drinking in the normal reclined manner which they did in those times. By you reasoning, maybe we should all be laying down at leisure while taking the Eucharist? That would be ludicrous and you know it. Also, Jesus said "WHENEVER YOU DO THIS (meaning reclining at mealtime), "do this in remembrance of me." This simply means "grace" at meals--not some pomp and circumstance ritualistic mumbo-jumbo, mystical bull. Everything in the Catholic service is show and display, holier than thou crap. I should know, I grew up in it and not ONE single priest in my community or in all the surrounding communities were "celibate" by any stretch of the imagination. Every single one was homosexual and every single person I knew who went into the "ministry" (and I say that with contempt) was also homosexual. My own brother was "turned" by a priest and another molested which turned their lives into a living hell. They were ALL alcoholic, cigarette smoking hypocrites that would swoon if any male "played them" like I have seen so many "on the streets" get played by opportunists by offering sex to con them out of their money. Hitting priests up for money for a promise of sex was nauseating to me as well, but it surely showed me how corrupt that organization was and how sick in the head they were.

This is why I believed Christianity to be a joke growing up. Fortunately, I came to understand the difference between TRUE Christianity and the MYSTERY garbage of Catholicism. It is SATANIC through and through. The nuns were HORRIBLE people. I have seen them do utterly cruel things to CHILDREN and are probably responsible for MANY screwed up kids--one of which I remember quite clearly in Kindergarten who messed his pants IN UTTER FEAR. Another I knew went on to commit a horrible murder of two nuns WITH A CRUCIFIX. How ANYONE can defend Catholicism in this day and age is totally beyond me. It will have its ONE HOUR along with the other beasts with its so-called New World Order. In prophetic time, one hour is 28 days. THAT is how long their confederacy will last before they are totally destroyed (along with you, of course for spreading your Jesuit filth). Mock on you spawn of Satan. Your reward is approaching, and thankfully (for you), it won't be your EVERLASTING HELL. The thought of you burning in hell forever would really spoil my day. I would MUCH RATHER see you burnt up root and branch so that WE in the heavenly kingdom need NEVER SEE your sinful kind ever again. As far as many of your fellow believers, there are many conscientious believers who will make their stand with Christ's true believers when they hear the angels say: "Come out of her my people that you receive NOT her plagues".