#911Truth #WTFact No. 3: The Twin Towers Were Imploded In A Controlled Demolition | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19755366 12/11/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| conspiracy analyst (OP) User ID: 29483319 12/11/2012 02:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Down Under Wonder. User ID: 29610709 12/11/2012 03:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23766809 12/11/2012 03:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| conspiracy analyst (OP) User ID: 29483319 12/11/2012 03:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True. Quoting: Down Under Wonder. 29610709 Buildings were designed to take a hit from a plane. And even if the top collapsed, why would the rest of it fall down? Funny thing is, skyscrapers have been hit by large passenger aircraft in the past... and they ALL stood fast. The Impire State Building comes to mind. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23766809 Absolutely true my friends! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29549442 12/11/2012 03:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9717714 12/11/2012 03:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It might have been an automatic failsafe to keep the buildings from falling and squashing the rest of the city.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29549442 I've thought of that possibility. Heard an interview with one of the architects involved in the WTC design and construction, and he claimed both towers were built with demo charges in place - as part of the design to bring the straight down in case of emergency - where one toppling over would do much worse damage. |
| Down Under Wonder. User ID: 29610709 12/11/2012 03:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heard an interview with one of the architects involved in the WTC design and construction, and he claimed both towers were built with demo charges in place - as part of the design to bring the straight down in case of emergency - where one toppling over would do much worse damage. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9717714 Let me guess, the interview was after 9/11? |
| WTFRLY User ID: 14318186 12/11/2012 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It might have been an automatic failsafe to keep the buildings from falling and squashing the rest of the city.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29549442 They found a convenient solution to the multi-billion dollar asbestos problem #WTFRLY? [link to www.wtfrly.com] |
| bendinglight User ID: 2143478 12/11/2012 03:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20550502 12/11/2012 03:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It might have been an automatic failsafe to keep the buildings from falling and squashing the rest of the city.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29549442 They found a convenient solution to the multi-billion dollar asbestos problem All the money missing from the pentagon as well it was a win win for Cheney and Raytheon. |
| WTFRLY User ID: 1604454 12/11/2012 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It might have been an automatic failsafe to keep the buildings from falling and squashing the rest of the city.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29549442 They found a convenient solution to the multi-billion dollar asbestos problem All the money missing from the pentagon as well it was a win win for Cheney and Raytheon. Yea it was a big party, looting the American public's resources even moreso after 2001. #WTFRLY? [link to www.wtfrly.com] |
| nyy45 User ID: 17544907 12/11/2012 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True. Quoting: Down Under Wonder. 29610709 Buildings were designed to take a hit from a plane. And even if the top collapsed, why would the rest of it fall down? Do you know anything about construction? This is the first part of 5 part video on youtube from National Geographic "Big, Bigger, Biggest". I'd suggest you watch the whole thing, but if you want to see how/why the trade center was built that way, it's in part 3, and if you want to see an engineer demonstrate a building collapse, watch the 4th part on Taipai 101. [link to www.youtube.com] At the time, the WTC was an enormous undertaking and structurally, weren't built the best but were built to stand up, just not built to hold a 747 full of fuel.. |
| WTFRLY User ID: 14318186 12/15/2012 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True. Quoting: Down Under Wonder. 29610709 Buildings were designed to take a hit from a plane. And even if the top collapsed, why would the rest of it fall down? Do you know anything about construction? This is the first part of 5 part video on youtube from National Geographic "Big, Bigger, Biggest". I'd suggest you watch the whole thing, but if you want to see how/why the trade center was built that way, it's in part 3, and if you want to see an engineer demonstrate a building collapse, watch the 4th part on Taipai 101. [link to www.youtube.com] At the time, the WTC was an enormous undertaking and structurally, weren't built the best but were built to stand up, just not built to hold a 747 full of fuel.. If you think the building "collapse" was caused by the plane and jet fuel, you don't know physics or construction. Even if that were what happened, the physical evidence would show that. The rubble is inconsistent with a collapse. #WTFRLY? [link to www.wtfrly.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29913037 12/15/2012 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29913037 12/15/2012 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True. Quoting: Down Under Wonder. 29610709 Buildings were designed to take a hit from a plane. And even if the top collapsed, why would the rest of it fall down? Do you know anything about construction? This is the first part of 5 part video on youtube from National Geographic "Big, Bigger, Biggest". I'd suggest you watch the whole thing, but if you want to see how/why the trade center was built that way, it's in part 3, and if you want to see an engineer demonstrate a building collapse, watch the 4th part on Taipai 101. [link to www.youtube.com] At the time, the WTC was an enormous undertaking and structurally, weren't built the best but were built to stand up, just not built to hold a 747 full of fuel.. The planes were not 747's. Why do people who claim to be informed on this subject make such glaring errors? |
| WTFRLY User ID: 14318186 12/15/2012 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |