Compelling evidence Moon Landings fake

[link to www.youtube.com]

crosshairs only "behind" bright white objects, including ONLY the white stripes of the flag. On many hires photos you can see the bright objects bleed over the thin crosshairs in the image.


Shadows appropriate for perspective and terrain. Multiple lights would create multiple shadows on each object.


Nor should there be. doing the math on the thrust across the engine bell the pressure is about 1 PSI. There is however scouring of the light surface dust underneath the engine bell seen on many photos.


What do you mean exactly?


?



?

lets just say for a minute it was fake, how has it impacted anyone at all in any negative way? none! so who the f cares, please just stop with this crap.

That's a pretty good point.

It was not faked...stop living with paranoia and delusions....a reflector was placed there that a laser can be aimed at and the light is returned to earth...it was placed there by men. Get over it and get some fresh air...

Moon Landings:

Prove it!

Humans began bouncing lasers off the moon in 1958. So, I don't see why it was necessary to go put some mirrors on the surface 11 years later. You'd think that if they could do it without mirrors, why make such a big deal about the mirrors?

Good reason to make such a big deal about it. Them being there proves beyond doubt that you moon landing deniers are fucking idiots. Besides that a personal friend of mine was involved in that project and went pure ballistic when he heard about fools like you.

Kk, so follow the logic here:

By 1958 humans were bouncing lasers off the surface of the moon. Which means that you do not need mirrors to do so.

11 years later, we put some mirrors there, and we bounce some lasers off them, yet, this is pointless cause we've been able to bounce lasers for 11 years.


So now that we can do something that we have already been doing for 11 years, without any need to make a 480,000 mile round trip, proves that we did infact make the trip?

Huh? Seems like awful lot of effort to do something you've already been able to do for 11 years.

Personally I don't give shit either way so I am a fair judge. I looked at a lot of these moon landings were faked claims and I still do not see any HARD evidence it was faked, but I know we did not go there all those times to just collect some rocks.



There was/is a hidden agenda, and IMHO NASA is benefits from these moontard conspiracies because they lead the public away from their secret agenda.

Without the retroreflector one must use a more powerful laser and you still get a diffuse weak return. With the reflector you can use a lower power laser and you get a more precise return that gives them millimeter accuracy.

Money was stolen moron

Luna unmanned rovers could easily have placed the reflectors on the moon. Ask yourself where are all the moon rovers? And why are there none sent today to visit the fake apollo sites?? Ask yourself!

And you went to school until you were nineteen. Seems like a lot of effort for so little result.

PROOOF that the moon landings are REAL:

"The United States' Apollo 11 was the first manned mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969. There have been six manned U.S. landings (between 1969 and 1972) and numerous unmanned landings, though no soft landings have occurred since 1976."

[link to en.wikipedia.org]