The Helical Model - Our Solar System Is A Vortex!

“The Vortex Solar System proved by Dr. Keshava Bhat. This means the end of the academic, helio-centric “clock work face” orbit theory, invented by the “catholic military priest” nicolas copernicus and later cherished by newton, brahe, kepler, galileo, einstein, hawking, sagan and the rest of their academic ilk...

The Vortex Solar System proved by Dr. Keshava Bhat. This means the end of the academic, helio-centric “clock work face” orbit theory, invented by the “catholic military priest” nicolas copernicus and later cherished by newton, brahe, kepler, galileo, einstein, hawking, sagan and the rest of their academic ilk.

The proof of Dr. Bhat’s assertion that the outer planets can be seen throughout the year! The inner ones disappear in the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun, they do not pass behind it as claimed by academia. The two to three weeks the outer planets disappear is due to their being within the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun from an Earth bound perspective."

[link to consciouslyconnecting.blog.com]

Gotta love those 'quick to one star' bandits ;)

Last Edited by Anonymous Cowherder on 12/13/2012 04:29 PM

[link to www.shaeqkhan.com]

wow that changes everything doesnt it? thanks op.

Now, if the model was made to scale with actual planet/star sizes/shapes along with the actual "orbit" then accounted for the star's drift from linear trajectory or including the actual arching path, and then place that into relation with the movement of the galactic arm, in relation to the galactic drift, then you are beginning to get the whole picture...like the backtrack music.

The universe consists of a series of spiral
bodies of diminishing size, each made in turn by plasma
ejection and moulded by a spatial Coriolis effect: a rotating
fractal universe.

The Big Bang theory is a failure. It has failed
because the wrong guesses were made by Einstein and Friedman.
Their equations ignored electricity’s dominant role in the
universe. So much for the supposed ‘rigour of mathematics’.
Therefore research for the following hypothesis, was begun
using pictures, not maths, but the attempt to explain the
wide-spread occurrence of spirals in space produced
unexpected results. The identification of similarities
between all sizes of bodies from super-galactic to atomic
brought with it, like it or no, a clear connection to
Schroedinger’s quantum mathematics!

Only passing reference to the mathematical
aspects are relevant in a pop science website such as this.
Those interested should refer to one of the many books on the
subject of Schroedinger’s atomic physics. Max Born’s “Atomic
Physics” published by Blackie and Son takes some beating but
it is hard to find now.

This website is an extended conversion of a slideshow that was presented to Manchester Astronomical Society in September 2002. It should be read through in order.

[link to www.fractaluniverse.org]

Anyone care to contribute?

OK, one more time.

The Universe runs on Electricity, not Gravity.

Electric currents in Plasma (99.999% of our observable Universe is Plasma), naturally form spiral, helical currents.

This accounts, perfectly, for everything we see.

Simple and to the point, I like it

With the information presented in this video, I would like to pose a question.


How long before we (our whole solar system) travel close to another set of astronomical bodies? Probability says it is bound to happen.

Yes, everything is energy. Glad to be apart of you!

Couple minutes probably ;)

Enjoy the ride

:hr:

[link to porb.tumblr.com]

Great quote!

Thank you.

Op, this reminded me of the Fibonacci sequence as soon as I saw your vid.

Really intersting..

Very nice.... you're a "wake"

Keep ridin that wave!

Cool and so we keep learning every day..if we are so lucky

TARD strikes his own thread...

Love the instrumental used for the video.

Are galaxies not on the move through the universe? Why do we view galaxies as flat disks? Is that not wrong also?

1. This is stupid. Everyone already knew that the sun moved as the planets orbit.

2. The planets do not trail the sun. The orbits of the planets are very very well established by tons of empirical observation.